Je Suis Billy Boy - Free Speech in the UK

Je Suis Billy Boy - Free Speech in the UK

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

56 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
How do you decide which things I am allowed to say and not allowed to say? What is the criteria?
When I see your lips move I command you to cease!

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
M3333 said:
Exactly. I wouldn't do that as i am aware it is offensive. But if someone else wanted to do it then i would just think what an idiot doing such a stupid thing. I don't see the need to stop anyone doing it if they wanted but they can deal with the consequences of their own actions.

What does trying to censor it achieve??

The exact opposite, that is what it achieves.

When are the left who seem to have so much control in this country going to grasp it?
The SNP are the party in charge of current legislation granted, but the fact that it had cross party support (you do know what that means don't you?) is the relevant factor here. Action needed to be taken, as Rangers FC, who'd tried for the past ten years or so to rid themselves of their bigoted minority tacitly admitted they could do no more to alleviate the problem, ACTION HAD TO BE TAKEN.

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
M3333 said:
Exactly. I wouldn't do that as i am aware it is offensive. But if someone else wanted to do it then i would just think what an idiot doing such a stupid thing. I don't see the need to stop anyone doing it if they wanted but they can deal with the consequences of their own actions.

What does trying to censor it achieve??

The exact opposite, that is what it achieves.

When are the left who seem to have so much control in this country going to grasp it?
Germany has quite rigorous laws regarding Nazi paraphernalia, chants and slogans, like you say anyone who make such infringements can accept the consequences of their actions.

rupert the dog

1,433 posts

219 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
I'm sorry I can't be arsed to read the whole of this mindnumbingly schoolboy thread, but:


4 Years for singing a song? "Butterfly" and "wheel" come to mind.

Janluke

2,606 posts

160 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
xjsdriver said:
Nothing nutcase about my views, this goes way beyond what is politically correct or otherwise, it is a blight on Scotland. The SFA have had to take action against Rangers FC several times regarding the conduct of their "fans". It is a small minority of small minded bigoted idiots who ruin Rangers good name. It got to the stage where Rangers FC were saying we've done what we can to stop the bigots, so a decision was made to be more pro-active in the courts to stamp out the sectarian chants and singing, which has led to deaths (usually by stabbings).
It is my guess you don't live in Scotland and may not appreciate how serious the situation had become. Or if you do live in Scotland, then you are either totally blind to what's been going on, or are simply a vile apologist for such disgusting behaviour.
I've not agreed with many of your posts on the Independence thread(while respecting your right to a different opinion) but find myself agreeing with most of your statements on this thread. I think every right thinking person in Scotland regardless of political views or religious beliefs hates sectarianism. Its our nations disgrace on both sides

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
Janluke said:
I've not agreed with many of your posts on the Independence thread(while respecting your right to a different opinion) but find myself agreeing with most of your statements on this thread. I think every right thinking person in Scotland regardless of political views or religious beliefs hates sectarianism. Its our nations disgrace on both sides
I just don't think that the majority on here "get it" - they see it as just some "harmless songs", which couldn't be further from reality. The sooner the country moves on, the better.

simoid

19,772 posts

160 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
It really is a strange kettle of fish. I dont even know what's illegal.

The song? The tune? The words? Or is it only if you choose all three? And it has to be at/on the way to the football?

Can't get my head around it tbh. Not like we can start banning the word "Fenian" - it's used by the blue and green alike.

Sir Humphrey

387 posts

125 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
xjsdriver said:
I just don't think that the majority on here "get it" - they see it as just some "harmless songs", which couldn't be further from reality. The sooner the country moves on, the better.
I haven't read every single post but I don't think I've seen anyone call it harmless.

drainbrain

5,637 posts

113 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
What harm does the song do? Does anyone much give a toss about the content of the tribal chants of bonebrains? My goodness that's pretty easily offended. Wouldn't you expect a bonebrain's tribal chant to be full of stupid content?

If we're going to jail stupid people for being stupid and doing stupid things like singing stupid songs we'd better build a lot of jails.

Surely the easily offended would be placated by a much lower level sentence (like a £30 fine) for singing a stupid song. Keep the jail for real offences. It's too expensive to be used for stupid song singers.


simoid

19,772 posts

160 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Re. The French anthem:

"Let impure blood water our furrows"

Does the impure blood come from Johnny Foreigner?

simoid

19,772 posts

160 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
What harm does the song do? Does anyone much give a toss about the content of the tribal chants of bonebrains? My goodness that's pretty easily offended. Wouldn't you expect a bonebrain's tribal chant to be full of stupid content?

If we're going to jail stupid people for being stupid and doing stupid things like singing stupid songs we'd better build a lot of jails.

Surely the easily offended would be placated by a much lower level sentence (like a £30 fine) for singing a stupid song. Keep the jail for real offences. It's too expensive to be used for stupid song singers.
Hadn't thought about the expense - what is it to house someone in jail again? £30k-£40k a year or something? Plus court and police costs I suppose.


xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
simoid said:
It really is a strange kettle of fish. I dont even know what's illegal.

The song? The tune? The words? Or is it only if you choose all three? And it has to be at/on the way to the football?

Can't get my head around it tbh. Not like we can start banning the word "Fenian" - it's used by the blue and green alike.
So Simoid, you do condone the actions of the moronic dinosaurs who bring your football team into disrepute then? Any decent Rangers fans I know (and I do know quite a fair few) are absolutely appalled by their actions.
Your attitude to this speaks volumes about your character. Being a Rangers fan yourself, you really should know better. You've baselessly accused me of sectarianism before, but you've just shown yourself up as a vile apologist.
We've already established it is the context the word Fenian is used, as the word itself is not necessarily sectarian in itself. Please do not debase the debate any further than you have already.

Sir Humphrey

387 posts

125 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
What harm does the song do? Does anyone much give a toss about the content of the tribal chants of bonebrains? My goodness that's pretty easily offended. Wouldn't you expect a bonebrain's tribal chant to be full of stupid content?

If we're going to jail stupid people for being stupid and doing stupid things like singing stupid songs we'd better build a lot of jails.

Surely the easily offended would be placated by a much lower level sentence (like a £30 fine) for singing a stupid song. Keep the jail for real offences. It's too expensive to be used for stupid song singers.
Given the history between Catholics and Protestants in Scotland and Ireland I would say it at the very least has the potential to be harmful. But that is no reason to ban it. If anything it is better to have these discussions out in the open rather than force them underground where they can do a lot more damage.

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
rupert the dog said:
I'm sorry I can't be arsed to read the whole of this mindnumbingly schoolboy thread, but:


4 Years for singing a song? "Butterfly" and "wheel" come to mind.
I agree, 4 years would be a tad harsh - he was sentenced to 4 MONTHS HTH

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
Given the history between Catholics and Protestants in Scotland and Ireland I would say it at the very least has the potential to be harmful. But that is no reason to ban it. If anything it is better to have these discussions out in the open rather than force them underground where they can do a lot more damage.
If you'd lived in Scotland as long as I have, you may see things very differently indeed. As does every other right thinking person.

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
I haven't read every single post but I don't think I've seen anyone call it harmless.
So you haven't read braindrain's post amongst others then?

Sir Humphrey

387 posts

125 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
xjsdriver said:
If you'd lived in Scotland as long as I have, you may see things very differently indeed. As does every other right thinking person.
I have no interest in protecting people from being offended. It is much better to have these discussions in public where people can see the different arguments and evidence and make up their own mind than making martyrs.

xjsdriver

1,071 posts

123 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
I have no interest in protecting people from being offended. It is much better to have these discussions in public where people can see the different arguments and evidence and make up their own mind than making martyrs.
He hasn't been made a martyr, simply been made an example of - no decent Rangers fan will mourn that fact he's been jailed, in fact they will be applauding the sentence, as he and others like him bring disrepute not only to Rangers FC, but to Scotland in general.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
What does actually give with the proddy/Rangers fixation xj?

technodup

7,585 posts

132 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
xjsdriver said:
Sir Humphrey said:
Given the history between Catholics and Protestants in Scotland and Ireland I would say it at the very least has the potential to be harmful. But that is no reason to ban it. If anything it is better to have these discussions out in the open rather than force them underground where they can do a lot more damage.
If you'd lived in Scotland as long as I have, you may see things very differently indeed. As does every other right thinking person.
If the powers that be addressed the causes rather than the symptoms then we might ultimately get somewhere. But as long as they allow/condone/encourage splitting up 5 year olds for a childhood of division based on religious lines banning a couple of songs won't make the slightest difference.

As a poster a page or two back alluded to. Williamwood in my case btw.