Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?

[Caddyshack]

OddCat said:

I really wish that I thought the world was a fair and honest place where decency prevailed and there was no large scale underhand behaviour.

And where I believed that Hunted Biden didn't even have a laptop, there wasn't a lab in Wuhan doing gain of function research into bat viruses funded by the US, and a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

That would be lovely.

What?, the plane did not really crash in to the pentagon at all?

[paulguitar]

OddCat said:

a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Just a small amount of sensible neutral research will quickly debunk that particular conspiracy theory.


As a starting point, excellent article below by 767 pilot and writer Patrick Smith:


https://www.salon.com/2006/05/19/askthepilot186/


Let us know your thoughts.

[Blown2CV]

hunter biden's laptop wuhan lab great reset bildaberg group jet fuel can't melt steel beams inside job birds aren't real flight MH370 freemasonry illuminati false flag deep state obama's birth certificate hilary's emails 5G masts we've not been on the fking moon chemtrails denver airport epstein's wall hangings ukraine something not right about it flat earth and also shergar

[Blown2CV]

Blown2CV said:

hunter biden's laptop wuhan lab great reset bildaberg group jet fuel can't melt steel beams inside job birds aren't real flight MH370 freemasonry illuminati false flag deep state obama's birth certificate hilary's emails 5G masts we've not been on the fking moon chemtrails denver airport epstein's wall hangings ukraine something not right about it flat earth and also shergar

when you say it like that, it's obvious that they're all linked.

[GappySmeg]

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

[Caddyshack]

paulguitar said:

OddCat said:

a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Just a small amount of sensible neutral research will quickly debunk that particular conspiracy theory.


As a starting point, excellent article below by 767 pilot and writer Patrick Smith:


https://www.salon.com/2006/05/19/askthepilot186/


Let us know your thoughts.

Yes, I have just read the engineers reports which are supported by many witnesses that one wing hit the ground and the other sheared off on the concrete structure…."they don’t make cartoon like aeroplane holes in buildings" was in the report.

[longblackcoat]

Blown2CV said:

hunter biden's laptop wuhan lab great reset bildaberg group jet fuel can't melt steel beams inside job birds aren't real flight MH370 freemasonry illuminati false flag deep state obama's birth certificate hilary's emails 5G masts we've not been on the fking moon chemtrails denver airport epstein's wall hangings ukraine something not right about it flat earth and also shergar

Aren't those the lyrics to "We didn't start the fire"?

[mickk]

longblackcoat said:

Aren't those the lyrics to "We didn't start the fire"?

[Caddyshack]

GappySmeg said:

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

From what I have read the loons think it was a different type of plane or a missile.

[Rollin]

OddCat said:

I really wish that I thought the world was a fair and honest place where decency prevailed and there was no large scale underhand behaviour.

And where I believed that Hunted Biden didn't even have a laptop, there wasn't a lab in Wuhan doing gain of function research into bat viruses funded by the US, and a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

That would be lovely.

A real one!!

[GappySmeg]

Caddyshack said:

GappySmeg said:

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

From what I have read the loons think it was a different type of plane or a missile.

Thanks.

I've heard all the "inside job", "false flag" wibble, but never that it wasn't ACTUALLY a plane. The desperation of some people to 'elevate' themselves above us mere mortals by signing in to this guff, is staggering!

[OddCat]

Caddyshack said:

GappySmeg said:

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

From what I have read the loons think it was a different type of plane or a missile.

Umpteen pieces of footage of the planes hitting the twin towers - but not a single piece of footage from anyone, or from CCTV (you can't tell me the Pentagon isn't CCTV'd to the eyeballs), or any individual, of a plane anywhere near the Pentagon 🤔

Right ho. As you were...

[paulguitar]

OddCat said:

Umpteen pieces of footage of the planes hitting the twin towers - but not a single piece of footage from anyone, or from CCTV (you can't tell me the Pentagon isn't CCTV'd to the eyeballs), or any individual, of a plane anywhere near the Pentagon ??

Right ho. As you were...

Directly contradicted in the article I linked.


Did you read it?

[GappySmeg]

OddCat said:

Caddyshack said:

GappySmeg said:

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

From what I have read the loons think it was a different type of plane or a missile.

Umpteen pieces of footage of the planes hitting the twin towers - but not a single piece of footage from anyone, or from CCTV (you can't tell me the Pentagon isn't CCTV'd to the eyeballs), or any individual, of a plane anywhere near the Pentagon ??

Right ho. As you were...

Does this not count at all?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SL2PzzOiF8

[anonymous-user]

OddCat said:

Caddyshack said:

GappySmeg said:

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

From what I have read the loons think it was a different type of plane or a missile.

Umpteen pieces of footage of the planes hitting the twin towers - but not a single piece of footage from anyone, or from CCTV (you can't tell me the Pentagon isn't CCTV'd to the eyeballs), or any individual, of a plane anywhere near the Pentagon ??

Right ho. As you were...

For the sake of Jehovah

[captain_cynic]

OddCat said:

Caddyshack said:

GappySmeg said:

OddCat said:

... a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Woah, that's a new one on me.

Can you elaborate your beliefs on this please?

[Genuinely... I've not heard this one]

From what I have read the loons think it was a different type of plane or a missile.

Umpteen pieces of footage of the planes hitting the twin towers - but not a single piece of footage from anyone, or from CCTV (you can't tell me the Pentagon isn't CCTV'd to the eyeballs), or any individual, of a plane anywhere near the Pentagon ??

Right ho. As you were...

The good thing is, by continuing to rabbit on about this nonsense, he's making his other theories even less credible than they were.

[OddCat]

paulguitar said:

OddCat said:

a massive airliner really did manage to crash horizontally into the Pentagon - but, miraculously, made only one hole where the fragile nose made contact with the wall but not two massive holes where the engines hit the wall.

Just a small amount of sensible neutral research will quickly debunk that particular conspiracy theory.


As a starting point, excellent article below by 767 pilot and writer Patrick Smith:


https://www.salon.com/2006/05/19/askthepilot186/


Let us know your thoughts.

I'm not persuaded by this at all.

I am, though, interested in him saying this:

"OK, I'm genuinely curious about why the surveillance tapes from the Sheraton Hotel near the Pentagon were confiscated, and why their contents were never made public"

And one shonky bit of footage showing an 'object' but that's about it. I'd need a clear piece of footage of at least the plane approaching the Pentagon.

What amazes me is that people aren't even open to the possibility of foul play. Like I said, I wish I believed that the world was lovely.

Anyway, this is clearly a "bash anyone who doesn't buy the official narrative" thread (I should have known from the title) so it's not for me.

I'll let the self congratulating gullible have their thread back now !

[S17Thumper]

That’s a pretty good example of how CT thinking works.

[Seventy]

OddCat.

Interested in what you think actually struck the Pentagon?

Serious question.

[paulguitar]

OddCat said:

I'm not persuaded by this at all.

I am, though, interested in him saying this:

"OK, I'm genuinely curious about why the surveillance tapes from the Sheraton Hotel near the Pentagon were confiscated, and why their contents were never made public"

It's predictable and rather amusing that out of that entire, lengthy article that calmly, logically, and comprehensively debunks the claptrap you and others spout, you've zoomed in on that one line, and ignored everything else. It quite succinctly demonstrates the painfully compromised mind of the conspiracist at work, so thank you for providing us with a real-world example.

OddCat said:

What amazes me is that people aren't even open to the possibility of foul play.

Many people are completely open to the possibility of foul play. It's just that they require evidence to support that accusation.

OddCat said:

Anyway, this is clearly a "bash anyone who doesn't buy the official narrative" thread (I should have known from the title) so it's not for me.

I'll let the self congratulating gullible have their thread back now !

That's a disappointingly rapid flounce. All you've done here is embarrass yourself.