Porpoising, what if?
Discussion
HustleRussell said:
TypeRTim said:
I'm surprised Merc aren't being more vocal about the cost cap considering how much they must've had to spend in both time and materials trying to get their car to work...let alone work quickly and consistently! They must be cutting it pretty fine with the limit considering that they had the smallest budget to begin the year.
I don't know how much they will have spent. They had had incremental developments but no major upgrade package until Silverstone. They have also finished every race with both cars. I can't remember either of the drivers knocking a corner off. No mechanical failures.
It has looked to me as though they have basically expended a lot of energy into 'understanding' it and have not yet committed a significant amount to 'fixing' it.
What if Ferrari and Red Bull have simply overspent and Mercedes' performance is because they have strategically chosen a flatter development curve where they study and experiment with their first iteration car, ensure it is reliable and plan to take their major developments deeper into the season when they are able to fully understand them and execute them with confidence.
Ferrari and Red Bull have both blown up a good few PUs.
I don't think Mercedes are mugs. I predicted at the start of the season that they would be a factor by the start of European leg of the season. Could they have played it very cool and rigidly executed a conservative strategy which avoids reliability problems and budget dramas?
Mercedes have definitely been forced in to a long period of 'fact finding' around their car, from what I've seen/read they've had several different floor designs and a few different front wing designs as they have trialled things to try and dial out the porpoising whilst keeping their ride height low.
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff