RE: Porsche updates 918 performance stats

RE: Porsche updates 918 performance stats

Monday 18th November 2013

Porsche updates 918 performance stats

Quicker as an EV and a hybrid, the 918 posts another stunning set of numbers



As if that 'ring lap time wasn't enough, Porsche has landed us with another surprise on the 918 Spyder's performance. Without detailing exactly how, its acceleration times have been revised so it's now even faster than previously stated.

918 now apparently capable of 0-186 in 20sec
918 now apparently capable of 0-186 in 20sec
A couple of tenths have been taken from the 0-60 mph time (now 2.5 seconds) and the 0-124mph is half a second quicker at 7.2. Less than 20 seconds are now required to sprint from a standstill to 186mph, an improvement of two seconds.

Porsche also claims the 918 is faster on just electric power too. As standard, it will hit 62mph seven tenths quicker at 6.2 seconds. The Weissach package takes a tenth off that figure.

So how does it compare to the McLaren? That 0-124mph figure is just 0.4 seconds behind the P1, but the 918's 19.9-second 0-186mph time is 3.4 seconds slower. Anyone else want to see a race?

[Source: WCF]

Author
Discussion

CraigyMc

Original Poster:

16,557 posts

238 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
If it's gaining 0.2s on the 0-62mph and another 0.3s on the 62-124mph, surely that points to more power?

The 918 disconnects the (front) electric drive above 146mph, so the 146-186mph performance won't be changed by that.

Ex Boy Racer

1,151 posts

194 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Obviously had it chipped

toppstuff

13,698 posts

249 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Considering this is the absolute cutting edge, the pinnacle of car design in the 21st century, am i the only one who finds the 918 looks disappointingly retro?


Ryvita

715 posts

212 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Interesting. This could become a common feature of electric hybrid vehicles, where there may be increased potential for a "firmware update" having significant effect on performance.

I guess that with additional miles under the wheels, engineers have said yes to a reduction in some of the safety factors, allowing an increase in power somewhere in the system? The limiting factor is normally the thermal maximum on battery peak output isn't it?

IMI A

9,431 posts

203 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
20 lap race of NBR. Vettel in Porsche and Hamilton in Macca. Macca would lead due to Hamilton's skill closely followed by Porsche but ultimately breakdown after about 10 laps!

CraigyMc

Original Poster:

16,557 posts

238 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
IMI A said:
20 lap race of NBR. Vettel in Porsche and Hamilton in Macca. Macca would lead due to Hamilton's skill closely followed by Porsche but ultimately breakdown after about 10 laps!
That would be a 456km race, and neither of them would make it to the finishing line without at least a (more likely several) pitstops.

P4ROT

1,219 posts

195 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Ex Boy Racer said:
Obviously had it chipped

acer12

978 posts

176 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
IMI A said:
20 lap race of NBR. Vettel in Porsche and Hamilton in Macca. Macca would lead due to Hamilton's skill closely followed by Porsche!
???

red_slr

17,454 posts

191 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
I suspect its the normal MO for Porsche to figure their cars and then "add a bit on"... you know just in case.
Now their main rivals have figured their cars they thought it was probably best to revise the figures to more realistic numbers!

epom

11,726 posts

163 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
Considering this is the absolute cutting edge, the pinnacle of car design in the 21st century, am i the only one who finds the 918 looks disappointingly retro?
I think it is by far and away the best looking to the current 3 hypercars.

unpc

2,844 posts

215 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
Considering this is the absolute cutting edge, the pinnacle of car design in the 21st century, am i the only one who finds the 918 looks disappointingly retro?
It's quite pretty but hardly blazing a trail is it?

WokkaWokka

704 posts

141 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
I really like both the Porsche and McLaren but the porsche leaves me feeling warmer than the Macca. Has the ring time for the P1 been published yet?

CraigyMc

Original Poster:

16,557 posts

238 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
WokkaWokka said:
Has the ring time for the P1 been published yet?
No it hasn't been published, and they've said they won't publish it at all.

CedricN

823 posts

147 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Saw a couple of them this summer, looks a lot more spectacular in the flesh. Front looks almost boring at the pictures..

Interesting that the bootlid was all covered in black soot from the exhaust, hope they fixed it on the production versions, otherwise a white car would be very painful to own smile

wtdoom

3,742 posts

210 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
The stats are faster because the front e motor is optimised to rev at a higher rpm now and work for longer . It disconnects later( 160/170mph I forget exactly ) now and some of the other systems have been optimised and are now better integrated . They estimate a ring time of a minimum of 10 seconds faster than before and promise all stats and lap times will be completely and consistently repeatable in customer cars .
Apparently the acceleration figures and especially the power and torque figures are "on the conservative side ".


Edited by wtdoom on Monday 18th November 14:14

CraigyMc

Original Poster:

16,557 posts

238 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
wtdoom said:
The stats are faster because the front e motor is optimised to rev at a higher rpm now and work for longer . It disconnects later( 160/170mph I forget exactly ) now and some of the other systems have been optimised and are now better integrated . They estimate a ring time of a minimum of 10 seconds faster than before and promise all stats and lap times will be completely and consistently repeatable in customer cars .
Apparently the acceleration figures and especially the power and torque figures are "on the conservative side ".


Edited by wtdoom on Monday 18th November 14:14
It'd be nice if Porsche did a release explaining what they've done.

Anyone know if one exists?


ETA: Found it. VW group's website, obviously (!)

http://www.volkswagenag.com/content/vwcorp/info_ce...

Edited by CraigyMc on Monday 18th November 14:49

famfarrow

696 posts

156 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
As much as the Mc impresses me if I could only have one on my drive I would have the 918. Just lovely.

dukebox9reg

1,575 posts

150 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
famfarrow said:
As much as the Mc impresses me if I could only have one on my drive I would have the 918. Just lovely.
Why? It looks like a Boxster with a body kit.

SevenR

242 posts

166 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
the new figs are after they've fitted an aftermarket exhaust and an induction kit

The Surveyor

7,578 posts

239 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
famfarrow said:
As much as the Mc impresses me if I could only have one on my drive I would have the 918. Just lovely.
Good job too as all the P1s are now sold. Pointless comparing numbers as the performance is so far beyond what's permissible on the road and beyond most mortals ability on the track. Both will be equally amazing but I'm just not excited by the way the Porsche looks, especially when the P1 looks like something from a different planet...