MOT tester making up reason to fail test.
Discussion
Does anybody know why an MOT tester would fail a car on something minor - a fault that isn't actually there? He would then immediately issue a pass certificate.
This has happened twice now on different cars but neither car actually had a problem.
It's slightly annoying as I would never take a car for a test with obvious problems such as a failed light.
This has happened twice now on different cars but neither car actually had a problem.
It's slightly annoying as I would never take a car for a test with obvious problems such as a failed light.
It must be to meet targets - I took a BMW E91 for an MOT in January and the tester wanted to fail it for worn rear brake pads.
I told him the OBC was showing they had over 20K miles left in them, and all of a sudden they became an advisory!
What a tw*t - the MOT is only designed to test the car in the condition it is presented in on the day, not foretell the future.
I told him the OBC was showing they had over 20K miles left in them, and all of a sudden they became an advisory!
What a tw*t - the MOT is only designed to test the car in the condition it is presented in on the day, not foretell the future.
It's more to do with not wanting a (near) 100% PASS rate I think.
The national average of cars passing first time isnt 100% - so if a station is up near that % they are potentially inviting a visit from DVSA to see what might be going on.
It could be genuine that a garage has such a high pass rate but it just looks out of the normal.
The national average of cars passing first time isnt 100% - so if a station is up near that % they are potentially inviting a visit from DVSA to see what might be going on.
It could be genuine that a garage has such a high pass rate but it just looks out of the normal.
DuraAce said:
It's more to do with not wanting a (near) 100% PASS rate I think.
The national average of cars passing first time isnt 100% - so if a station is up near that % they are potentially inviting a visit from DVSA to see what might be going on.
It could be genuine that a garage has such a high pass rate but it just looks out of the normal.
What is this based on? The national average of cars passing first time isnt 100% - so if a station is up near that % they are potentially inviting a visit from DVSA to see what might be going on.
It could be genuine that a garage has such a high pass rate but it just looks out of the normal.
Surely a new car dealership that does MOT’s could be quite likely to have a much higher pass rate than the council who or local classic car garage? I’d have thought there’s quite a big variation in pass rate depending where you go.
Mr Tidy said:
It must be to meet targets - I took a BMW E91 for an MOT in January and the tester wanted to fail it for worn rear brake pads.
I told him the OBC was showing they had over 20K miles left in them, and all of a sudden they became an advisory!
What a tw*t - the MOT is only designed to test the car in the condition it is presented in on the day, not foretell the future.
Must be a pretty decent garage that talks you through what they want to fail your car on before they do so. I told him the OBC was showing they had over 20K miles left in them, and all of a sudden they became an advisory!
What a tw*t - the MOT is only designed to test the car in the condition it is presented in on the day, not foretell the future.
Sensibleboy said:
Does anybody know why an MOT tester would fail a car on something minor - a fault that isn't actually there? He would then immediately issue a pass certificate.
This has happened twice now on different cars but neither car actually had a problem.
It's slightly annoying as I would never take a car for a test with obvious problems such as a failed light.
Thread is here : https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...This has happened twice now on different cars but neither car actually had a problem.
It's slightly annoying as I would never take a car for a test with obvious problems such as a failed light.
Full of MOT tester types.
Mr Tidy said:
It must be to meet targets - I took a BMW E91 for an MOT in January and the tester wanted to fail it for worn rear brake pads.
I told him the OBC was showing they had over 20K miles left in them, and all of a sudden they became an advisory!
What a tw*t - the MOT is only designed to test the car in the condition it is presented in on the day, not foretell the future.
You will often find that the obc is wrong and is also completely irrelevant when testing, it’s the pads themselves that are checked. So they will either fail as a dangerous defect if 1.5mm or less, anything else where the tester can see the pads are wearing thin would be pass and advise.I told him the OBC was showing they had over 20K miles left in them, and all of a sudden they became an advisory!
What a tw*t - the MOT is only designed to test the car in the condition it is presented in on the day, not foretell the future.
Hub said:
I've had this before - it failed on headlamp aim too high, and then passed. I didn't know anything about the failure until I checked the MOT history online! To my mind they could have seen the aim was out (if it even was out!), adjusted it and then passed it!
We are allowed to do minor repairs as we go during a test but we have to test as is. So if your headlights are out of adjustment and they will adjust easily we can re-set them but we have to fail it as it was wrong at time of test.
When we input the data at the end of test we have the option of ticking the 'PRS' box rather than the fail box, if we do this then the scheme will generate a fail and pass certificate at the end.
As to the last comment, why? How many jobs do you do for free? It would be entirely fair to fail the car, then place it on the beam tester, adjust the lamps and then re-test it with the associated cost. The beam testing equipment is not cheap and has to be calibrated at further cost so the fact it was sorted should be thanked rather than complained about.
There is an 'Ask the MOT tester' thread which is packed with q&a stuff on may topics to do with the test on here, have a look
And to the others on this thread: THERE ARE NO TARGETS FOR PASS OR FAIL, AT ALL!
torx_whisperer said:
Surely a new car dealership that does MOT’s could be quite likely to have a much higher pass rate than the council who or local classic car garage? I’d have thought there’s quite a big variation in pass rate depending where you go.
Indeed and the powers that be know that investigating a high pass rate at a main dealers is very likely to be a waste of time. For the lower ranks however putting your head above the parapet raises suspicion whether the business is reputable or not, so keep to "average" for a quiet life.Not a fail but I once took my car in for an MOT and service including the replacement of both front tyres.
When I picked it up later I had an advisory that both front tyres were close to the legal limit and a service invoice for two new front tyres.
Didn't complain but it did make me laugh.
When I picked it up later I had an advisory that both front tyres were close to the legal limit and a service invoice for two new front tyres.
Didn't complain but it did make me laugh.
ejenner said:
A lot of it is based on opinion though. Brake pads having less than 1.5mm inspected through a hole in the alloy wheel... pull the other one.
Have you ever stood under a car when it is on a ramp? You can, with very few exceptions, see how much material is left on the brake pads as clear as day.Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff