Back Protectors Advice

Back Protectors Advice

Author
Discussion

Mellow Matt

1,343 posts

209 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Graemsay said:
The chance of injuring a bodypart in a motorcycle accident decreases as you go up the body. Statistically you're actually very unlikely to need a back protector, and they might not help a great deal if you're wearing one.

This article includes a discussion with Dr Rod Woods, who basically invented the CE standard for protective motorcycle gear. A pertinent excerpt is:

The Good Doctor tells me that, statistically speaking, you want to protect yourself from the feet up. He tells me about this idea of a rating of the frequency with which an injury occurs (over, say the UK in a year) and the dehabilitation caused by the injury. Turn the statistics into betting odds, and we're talking about your chances of not being able to walk after a crash. Now, the Good Doctor says that this rating DECREASES as you go up the body, ie.fewer people are dehabilitated from chest injuries or back injuries than from foot injuries. Yes, I found it hard to believe too, but he's got the st atistics ! That means, protect your feet first, then your legs, then your body. He admits that there's a peak at the head, ie. the head causes more dehabilitation than the body, but from there down, this rule holds.

I openly admit that this all came as news to me. I told him all sorts of scenarios - chest injuries from upper body impact : ruptured kidneys from back impact : broken back from back impact - he told me that statistically speaking, they just don't happen. Back injuries seldom happen to bikers - and those that do would not be prevented by back protectors. "How so ?", I ask him. Well, statistically speaking, all back injuries in bikers (and they're few and far between) involve bending or twisting of the back - like when you r shoulder or chin hits the ground hard, with resultant detrimental effects on your back. Back protector won't help there, pal. He tells me that broken ankles are the most common injury you can imagine. Compare them to broken backs and you're talking mountains and molehills. Surprising stuff. Time to revise my ideas on protection.

A doctor who provides medical support for road races in Ireland posts on the Performance Bikes Forum as DocJohn. He reckons that the hard type of back protectors restrict movement so as to prevent the spine from being bent badly out of shape, and have been very helpful in the sort of back injuries that Dr Woods highlighted in the quote above.

That said, a back protector isn't a heavy, expensive or uncomfortable piece of kit, so it won't hurt to wear one. smile
That's interesting, and it makes sense really. It also makes me think that maybe I should get some better boots (my HG boots don't have much armour) and maybe wear leather trousers more (I mostly wear motorbike jeans with no proper armour). Hmmmm.

croyde

23,145 posts

232 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Reading that article above is pretty sobering considering that on my ride to work I wear a £400 Arai helmet, a £400 Dianese Jacket with back, elbow and shoulder armour, a £100 pair of racing gloves a pair of old Caterpillar work boots and a £40 pair of Gap jeans sometimes covered by a pair of £20 Peter Storm waterproof trousers.

I do have a pair of Furygan leather race style trousers but only tend to wear them for longer journeys.

Now thinking of getting some motocross shin and knee armour to wear over my jeans. Just funny that I have not seen anyone else do that.

Ballon

1,172 posts

221 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
I alwys do, either the already fitted ones in my HG jacket or my Dianese one with my leathers.

Shadow R1

3,800 posts

178 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Thats a interesting read.

I got the Oxford Max protector, which is the hard type.

Edited by Shadow R1 on Friday 11th February 08:46

TimmyWimmyWoo

4,307 posts

183 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
The research doesn't really surprise me – I always thought the first thing to hit the ground would be my legs, feet, hands and sides of my torso. Even if my back protector isn't ultimately going to save me from paralysis it can't be doing me any harm and it keeps me warm as it doubles as a kidney belt…



flyingjase

3,067 posts

233 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
I always wear a back protecter - it's no hassle to put on and it's just part of getting ready for a ride. Irrespective of what statistics say, it will deifinately provide some protection in the event of an accident, and could be the difference between walking away and not.