RE: 2022 Porsche Macan T | PH Review

RE: 2022 Porsche Macan T | PH Review

Thursday 11th August 2022

2022 Porsche Macan T | PH Review

Is the new Porsche Macan T now the sweet spot in the range?


I had afternoon 'T' in Surrey yesterday. Not the tea and scones kind, the Porsche kind. Because it was the UK launch of the new Porsche Macan T. Until now, that letter has been the preserve of 911s and 718s, but now it’s found its way onto the rump of Porsche’s littlest SUV – a car not long for this world, with the next generation of electric Macan being readied in the wings. As we’ve seen the ingredients before, you've probably got a good idea of what to expect here. Essentially, a GTS-flavoured Macan with an entry-level engine.

That means sportier looks. And it looks good, certainly good enough to trick the uninitiated into believing you’ve got something fruitier under the bonnet than VW’s venerable EA888 2.0-litre. There’s a smattering of Agate Grey Metallic to jazz up what’s either body coloured on the entry-level car – the door mirrors, more of the lower front bumper sections and also the sills – or replace what was simply black plastic – the door blades and rear spoiler, for example. The T also has black quad exhausts and dark titanium 20-inch alloys, which would be a £2,436 option if you wanted them on the base model. And that’s also the point: just enough equipment gains to justify the £5,000 price hike over the base Macan. So along with the Sports Chrono Pack (a £704 option on the basic car) you also get a GT sports steering wheel (£383), Sports seats with part-leather, part-Sport-Tex Stripe inserts and silver stitching.

There’s no more power, though. The outputs are pegged at 265hp and 295lb ft of shove, which means the on-paper acceleration to 62mph is a sprightly, but not astounding, 6.2 seconds. However, there are some other changes underneath. For a start, the T comes with PASM as standard (that’s another £816 extra on the base Macan) and it’s unique. Only the T comes with PASM and steel coils lowered by 15mm. If you opt for the air suspension, the ride-height drops by a further 10mm. There’s also a stiffer front anti-roll bar, and retuned chassis settings to take advantage of a 58.8kg lighter engine than the V6 in the Macan S. Because this is meant for the more driving-focused enthusiast, the Porsche Traction Management has also been tweaked to make the T more rear-biased. Lovely stuff.

The first this to say is that spending another £1,044 on air suspension would appear to be pointless. If you’re expecting a Macan with steel springs and a lower ride height to ride like an arthritic donkey with no saddle, it doesn’t. It rides very well, actually. Yes, the Macan T has the kind of belts and braces control that means it doesn’t tie itself in knots over challenging on-road terrain, but the suspension is sophisticated enough that it can still pick out the barbs from pretty much any intrusion. It doesn’t trip up over sharp stuff and it absorbs the initial impacts from larger lumps, like sleeping policemen, then controls the aftereffects superbly, too.

In fact, this is the dark arts of suspension tuning at it's best. It's so skillfully set up that you can run it in Sport +, which is the firmest mode, and the T still won’t crush your spine. Not even on the roads around Chobham, in Surrey, where I found myself venturing, and which I know from years of experience can make anything feel a bit brutal. These roads are coarser than a potty-mouthed cockney, and yet the T isolates you from any suspension noise or surface graininess supremely well. There’s not even a lot of wind noise, so it feels like a quality product.

Then there’s the body control. That’s bloody marvellous for a car just shy of two tonnes. Despite its mass, the vertical movements are checked quite brilliantly even in the toughest circumstances. And again, the roads we're talking about could’ve been designed to expose any weaknesses. What you find is that you can enter a corner knowing full well that if there’s any unevenness in the middle of it, the T will deal with it and not deviate off line. It’s incredibly reassuring. Especially when you add to that typically Porsche steering, which is well-weighted and sensibly geared. The only complaint there is that it's also as dull as the two-generation-old Audi Q5 on which it’s based in terms of feel. Still, this feels like a minor matter. The overriding impression is a hugely satisfying and enjoyable SUV to tackle B-roads with at seven-tenths.

But there's the crucial distinction: ‘at seven-tenths’. Because if you really start to press on – leaning on the brakes a bit more or carrying just a touch more speed into corners – the Macan T disappoints. I’ll point out before I get stuck into why that is, this was a hot day. 30-degrees ambient, so the sun-baked tarmac would’ve been considerably hotter. Perhaps too hot for the Pirelli P Zero tyres to grip up properly, and maybe the Michelin Latitude Sport 3s, which I noted were fitted to the other T on test, would've worked better. I don’t know, because I didn’t get to drive that car and they’re not a speccable option anyway. You get what you are given from what’s available when each car passes down the production line, apparently.

What I can say is that this car - on this particular day - lacked front grip. It simply drifted into ho-hum understeer at surprisingly low speeds. What about that rear bias, then? Well, for all the tweaks to its traction management and the added cost option of Porsche Torque Vectoring Plus fitted to the car I was driving, there was no evidence of that, either. It just wasn't playful. Once, just once, I felt the rear move under power. And that was at very slow speed coming, out of a T-junction, and no more than a twitch. The rest of the time you could barely feel the drive being sent rearwards under power, so the kind of oversteer that’s available to Macan S owners was completely absent. Now, I am not saying this is a crucial thing for everyone, but I do think it’s worth pointing out before anyone goes and orders a T under the illusion that it'll be the best-handling SUV ever. I am afraid this one wasn’t.

Still, I do have my suspicions that the heat and tyres were a factor, because even the braking didn’t seem up to the usual Macan standards. The pedal feel is quite solid at slow speeds but it goes a bit soft and dead when pressed harder, but that's still fine. What isn’t, is when the ABS seems to trigger unexpectedly easily. I wasn’t doing emergency stops, I promise. Just braking a little harder, consistent with a typically spirited drive.

It’s not like this car thunders up to bends after deploying its huge power. The straight-line speed is perfectly adequate, and the T is very driveable, too – the EA888’s forever-flat torque curve, as always, means it picks up and goes pretty much whenever you need it to. Maybe because the torque is a bit too evenly distributed, though, because it never feels that exciting or very quick from behind the wheel. And nor does it sound that great. All you get to savour is a four-cylinder, gravelly rasp at full chat. It’s perfectly pleasant but, equally, a little bit dull. There is a sports exhaust option, but this car didn’t have it and I’d be surprised if it's transformative. Sure, the dull pleasantries from those four tailpipes will be louder, but any more melodic? I doubt it.

So there you go, then. The Porsche Macan T looks pretty special, and it’s comfortable and refined and very lovely to drive, up to a point. Now, if that doesn’t bother you, then I reckon you’ll be quite chuffed with the standard car and an extra £5,000 in your bank account. Yet if you are looking for more from your sporty SUV – looking to tap into the Macan legend you've heard about many times – then, from what I've experienced I think you'll be a bit underwhelmed. So you should chuck another £1,000 at the problem. Go for the much quicker, much fruitier-sounding and, from my last experience of one, very much more playful Macan S.


Specification | Porsche Macan T

Engine: 1,984cc, four-cylinder, turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 265 @ 5,000-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295 @ 1,800-4,500rpm
0-62mph: 6.2 seconds
Top speed: 144mph
Weight: 1,865kg (DIN)
MPG: 27.7 (WLTP)
CO2: 230g/km (WLTP)
Price: £55,800 (£64,766 as tested)

Author
Discussion

PistonTim

Original Poster:

515 posts

140 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
So the car cant stand up to a British summer, I thought they were supposed to be tested in actual hot environments.

CoolHands

18,702 posts

196 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
I remember the first time I saw a Porsche Cayenne, on The Sopranos, and it reminded me of a boat. I still see that.


Wab1974uk

1,004 posts

28 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
Macan S is the sweet spot.

A YouTuber compared performance between S & GTS, and there was nothing in it. So why all the extra money?

Sadly, getting a Macan is proving dificult. Ordered February. Still no build date. But they did increase the price .... which was nice! I'm expecting another one before I actually get mine, then finance quote will no doubt be changed with higher interest too.

thelostboy

4,572 posts

226 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
I went from Diesel Macan on steel springs to GTS Macan with Air Suspension and PCCBs and it, perhaps not unsurprisingly, a completely different car to drive.

Perhaps the facelift and/or T configuration is an improvement on my old diesel, but as far as I'm concerned the air suspension is an ESSENTIAL upgrade. Likewise, if you're planning on keeping the car, the PCCBs are - roughly - a thousand times better; instant impact, and immense power making the car feel half its weight. And no brake dust!

Back to the Macan T, I couldn't face paying that much for a new Porsche that can be shown a clean pair of heels by a warm hatch (lets fact it, the 0-60 time is a flattering stat thanks to launch control).

130R

6,810 posts

207 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
I had a new base Macan as a courtesy car a couple of weeks ago and I couldn't wait to get rid of it. I actually suspected there might have been something wrong with it because I've driven a Macan S and a Cayenne S a few times before and thought both were good. It was a hot day and the car I had suffered the same complete lack of front end grip and gave absolutely no confidence to push on. The base engine is also not good IMO. Performance is just about ok but it's very thrashy and not at all pleasant to drive.

just passing by

46 posts

78 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
yawn. buy the S instead.
that awful gaping radiator grille is emphasised by a light paint colour. might be less goppingly ugly in a dark hue.

fantheman80

1,453 posts

50 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
So it gets the Golf R engine, but not the golf R power. Id want my Porsche quicker than a t-roc r!

Still sell loads mind you

Roger Irrelevant

2,948 posts

114 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
thelostboy said:
Back to the Macan T, I couldn't face paying that much for a new Porsche that can be shown a clean pair of heels by a warm hatch (lets fact it, the 0-60 time is a flattering stat thanks to launch control).
I'd be the same - I'm semi-seriously looking at quick SUVs for my next family car and though Macans are a theoretical possibility the problem is that the new-ish ones I can afford just aren't that quick (but still a bit thirstier than I'd like doing 17k miles per year). This is why I think diesels still make a lot of sense in decent sized SUVs and I'm finding it difficult to look past an X3 M40d (or even a 30d which is still a bit quicker than this, bearing in mind I won't be using it like a sports car).

T1berious

2,269 posts

156 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
fantheman80 said:
So it gets the Golf R engine, but not the golf R power. Id want my Porsche quicker than a t-roc r!

Still sell loads mind you
I was thinking exactly the same thing. The Tiguan R has a far more acceptable 0-60 of <5 seconds and is 15K cheaper?

I know brand cache is paramount to a lot of folks but this seems a bit odd. Surely you'd want the Porsche one quicker?

Plus the T as a concept is kind of lost on me, yep on a 992, Cayman and Boxster, fill yer boots but on an SUV? Not so sure.

A bit X3 M CSL .....

sxmwht

1,570 posts

60 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
Could never spend all that money on a Porsche that has the same engine as my current GTI, sorry. Not sure what they're thinking.

thelostboy

4,572 posts

226 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
Roger Irrelevant said:
thelostboy said:
Back to the Macan T, I couldn't face paying that much for a new Porsche that can be shown a clean pair of heels by a warm hatch (lets fact it, the 0-60 time is a flattering stat thanks to launch control).
I'd be the same - I'm semi-seriously looking at quick SUVs for my next family car and though Macans are a theoretical possibility the problem is that the new-ish ones I can afford just aren't that quick (but still a bit thirstier than I'd like doing 17k miles per year). This is why I think diesels still make a lot of sense in decent sized SUVs and I'm finding it difficult to look past an X3 M40d (or even a 30d which is still a bit quicker than this, bearing in mind I won't be using it like a sports car).
Can't blame you really. I can just about get 30-32mpg from the GTS which has a de-tuned RS4 engine. I'd be curious to know if I got it mapped whether I'd get better fuel economy. However a Diesel Macan wasn't hugely better, which is why I made the swap.

Curiously a Diesel Macan I had about 7 years ago (with the same engine as the Macan) used to do 42mpg+ with no issues.

If you're really doing 17,000 in a single car though, for me good economy is mainly important for range - I couldn't be bothered with refilling every few days.

ManyMotors

651 posts

99 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
I find the Macan rather large on the outside and small on the inside. Plus, it feels heavy. But people buy them....

cayman-black

12,662 posts

217 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
130R said:
I had a new base Macan as a courtesy car a couple of weeks ago and I couldn't wait to get rid of it. I actually suspected there might have been something wrong with it because I've driven a Macan S and a Cayenne S a few times before and thought both were good. It was a hot day and the car I had suffered the same complete lack of front end grip and gave absolutely no confidence to push on. The base engine is also not good IMO. Performance is just about ok but it's very thrashy and not at all pleasant to drive.
So they drive as they look!

British Beef

2,220 posts

166 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all

A lot of money for a car, any car, with a VW golf engine. Same power as Toyota manage from the Yaris GRs 3 cylinder 1.6, and double the cost.

This car is about as far away from Pistonheads wet dream as most electric offerings........ It will sell by the f**cking ship load.

You wont be able to drive past any school at drop of time without getting stuck behind a queue of these things double and triple parked.

WY86

1,335 posts

28 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
Wab1974uk said:
Macan S is the sweet spot.

A YouTuber compared performance between S & GTS, and there was nothing in it. So why all the extra money?

Sadly, getting a Macan is proving dificult. Ordered February. Still no build date. But they did increase the price .... which was nice! I'm expecting another one before I actually get mine, then finance quote will no doubt be changed with higher interest too.
The Macan S sounds terrible though, was at a petrol station where i heard one start up after refilling and yeah underwhelmed

Davy Jones

50 posts

50 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
Mrs has the S. Hate to say it, but a great drive.

smilo996

2,799 posts

171 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
2 tons and 65k of pointless and wasted resources.

nismo48

3,722 posts

208 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
2 tons and 65k of pointless and wasted resources.
Fair comment... wink

ate one too

2,902 posts

147 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
4 exhaust tips ..... FFS biglaugh

Crazy4557

674 posts

195 months

Thursday 11th August 2022
quotequote all
Definitely a pretend Porsche, one for the badge snobs out there.