Racing harnesses for road?
Discussion
Sort of following on from my current thread on GG looking for advice on type of harnesses to use in my road going car, wondered if anyone on this forum can tell me of any specfic laws regarding the use of harnesses on the Queen's Highway.
Some are labelled as "road legal" others aren't. I can't seem to tell the difference.
Can any legals/BiB help out here..? Is it to do with the buckle? Surely iof good enough for the track, they must be good enough for the road?
Thanks...
Some are labelled as "road legal" others aren't. I can't seem to tell the difference.
Can any legals/BiB help out here..? Is it to do with the buckle? Surely iof good enough for the track, they must be good enough for the road?
Thanks...
Checking information about the MOT suggests that:
The relevant wording in the RTA is (at least similar to):
"(iii) a seat belt which satisfies the requirements of a standard corresponding to the British Standard referred to in sub-paragraph (i); or
(iv) a seat belt designed for use by an adult which is a harness belt comprising a lap belt and shoulder straps and which satisfies the requirements of a standard corresponding to any of the British Standards referred to in sub-paragraph (ii)."
The acceptability of a "standard" is given as:
"For the purposes of this regulation a reference to a standard corresponding to a specified British Standard is a reference to—
(a) a standard or code of practice of a national standards body or equivalent body of any EEA State;
(b) any international standard recognised for use as a standard by any EEA State; or
(c) a technical specification recognised for use as a standard by a public authority of any EEA State,
where the standard, code of practice, international standard or technical specification provides in relation to seat belts, a level of safety equivalent to that provided by the British Standard and contains a requirement as respects the marking of seat belts equivalent to that provided by the British Standard."
I submit (butIANAL) that a seat belt meeting the approval of the FIA (or RAC MSD) should be acceptable.
You might wish to note that (AFAIK) the MOT test does not require the markings on the belt to be checked - so belts are not checked for compliance with any standard.
The MOT test's definition of a "seat belt" appears to be:
"A '3 point belt' means a seat belt which:
1) restrains the upper and lower parts of the torso;
2) includes a lap belt;
3) is anchored at not less than three points; and
4) is designed for use by an adult."
So I submit (but IANAL) that a racing harness (type) belt would comply.
Streaky
The relevant wording in the RTA is (at least similar to):
"(iii) a seat belt which satisfies the requirements of a standard corresponding to the British Standard referred to in sub-paragraph (i); or
(iv) a seat belt designed for use by an adult which is a harness belt comprising a lap belt and shoulder straps and which satisfies the requirements of a standard corresponding to any of the British Standards referred to in sub-paragraph (ii)."
The acceptability of a "standard" is given as:
"For the purposes of this regulation a reference to a standard corresponding to a specified British Standard is a reference to—
(a) a standard or code of practice of a national standards body or equivalent body of any EEA State;
(b) any international standard recognised for use as a standard by any EEA State; or
(c) a technical specification recognised for use as a standard by a public authority of any EEA State,
where the standard, code of practice, international standard or technical specification provides in relation to seat belts, a level of safety equivalent to that provided by the British Standard and contains a requirement as respects the marking of seat belts equivalent to that provided by the British Standard."
I submit (butIANAL) that a seat belt meeting the approval of the FIA (or RAC MSD) should be acceptable.
You might wish to note that (AFAIK) the MOT test does not require the markings on the belt to be checked - so belts are not checked for compliance with any standard.
The MOT test's definition of a "seat belt" appears to be:
"A '3 point belt' means a seat belt which:
1) restrains the upper and lower parts of the torso;
2) includes a lap belt;
3) is anchored at not less than three points; and
4) is designed for use by an adult."
So I submit (but IANAL) that a racing harness (type) belt would comply.
Streaky
Thanks
It is actually my intention to get a rollcage but i have other more important (non car
)things to spend money on at the moment.
I still think that as if i am going to have an accident under normal (?) situations, I am more likely to have a 'normal' shunt than an 'inverse' so reckon harnesses are to be more safe than my current inertia set up, which as i have explained on GG make me feel a bit nervous at the way they ride up my neck etc...
But i take on board what you say...
It is actually my intention to get a rollcage but i have other more important (non car

I still think that as if i am going to have an accident under normal (?) situations, I am more likely to have a 'normal' shunt than an 'inverse' so reckon harnesses are to be more safe than my current inertia set up, which as i have explained on GG make me feel a bit nervous at the way they ride up my neck etc...

But i take on board what you say...
I think there is an issue about being able to do up the belts with one hand (so Soccor Mum can keep putting her makeup on I think)
But most MOT people are sensible enough to accept a harness exceeds the requirements for restraint.
I feel a damn sight more secure wearing mine. Bit difficult turning and checking for cars at merging roads though....
But most MOT people are sensible enough to accept a harness exceeds the requirements for restraint.
I feel a damn sight more secure wearing mine. Bit difficult turning and checking for cars at merging roads though....
It would be well worth your time having a chat with one of the belt manufacturers or a kit car manufacturer before fitting it. If it's not positioned correctly it can actually contribute to internal injuries and the top straps will snap your collar bones too if the mounting points are too low. Well worth avoiding that kind of pain !
4-point Willans harness bolted to a properly installed beefy rollover bar has never raised any real issues, just plenty of ill informed comments.
However - the sanity of the passenger for allowing themselves to be strapped in to something that is clearly a very scary car is usually questioned.
Hmmm, Maybe it's my sanity they are questioning
However - the sanity of the passenger for allowing themselves to be strapped in to something that is clearly a very scary car is usually questioned.
Hmmm, Maybe it's my sanity they are questioning

OMP 3 point competition jobbies with Klunk-Klick style catch..
Mounted using existing seat belt mounting points for front two and rear is an inch square steel bar mounted between rear seat mounting points.. so I reckon it should be tough enough..
Thanks for pointing me to the sva stuff, that should help..
W
Mounted using existing seat belt mounting points for front two and rear is an inch square steel bar mounted between rear seat mounting points.. so I reckon it should be tough enough..
Thanks for pointing me to the sva stuff, that should help..
W
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff