New TVR still under wraps! (Vol. 3)

New TVR still under wraps! (Vol. 3)

Author
Discussion

keynsham

330 posts

282 months

Thursday 13th March
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
OIC said:
Anyone looked into how much Robin Wells has spent?

Is he private equity funded or just mega wealthy?

Seems to be quietly getting on with developing and producing quite a nice car without too much obvious difficulty.

Les may want to cast an eye over the Wells Motor Cars Ltd. files between rounds (of golf and drinks) at his Club.
It’s a horrid looking thing.
I rather like it. It has a certain 1960's Lotus feel about it.

Zeb74

413 posts

140 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
crosseyedlion said:
The difference aiming small and a non-corporate approach makes.

Just pouring money onto a vehicle project makes the business case incredibly tough.

Unless you're selling for 7 figures it needs to be done on a shoestring (relatively) and low volume, or significantly more investment than TVR has had and significant volumes. In-between is absolute suicide.
I don't think they really aiming to sell cars outside the UK. The cost of complying with various legislations is huge especially compared to what appears to be required of low volume local manufacturers.

crosseyedlion

2,252 posts

209 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Zeb74 said:
crosseyedlion said:
The difference aiming small and a non-corporate approach makes.

Just pouring money onto a vehicle project makes the business case incredibly tough.

Unless you're selling for 7 figures it needs to be done on a shoestring (relatively) and low volume, or significantly more investment than TVR has had and significant volumes. In-between is absolute suicide.
I don't think they really aiming to sell cars outside the UK. The cost of complying with various legislations is huge especially compared to what appears to be required of low volume local manufacturers.
Exactly my point. Legislation, infrastructure and the level of engineering for anything but low volumes is prohibitive. You can have quite a profitable business making vehicles in low volumes (done right).

The EU does have low volume exemption/derogations for low volumes, so they can sell there. And plenty of foreign markets on an individual basis.

None of this has changed since Les & Co took the reigns. Which is what makes it frustrating to me.

Antoinne

10 posts

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Wells isn't really comparable with TVR, at least post 1990s. It's comparable to Ginetta pre LNT. It even looks like an old Ginetta. It's in the realms of kit-car, built for you. You can see all the parts from other manufacturers parts bins in the interior and it looks kit-car inside.

There is no power steering, not even any servo for the brakes, let alone ABS, and you can forget about airbags etc. I don't think it will have have passed any crash test etc. They are being built under the basic IVA scheme.

You might say that is all fine, but the price tag is £65K. That's basically a nearly new 2.0 Lotus Emira with less than 500 miles on the clock, and you can collect the Emira today, whereas another thread on here suggests that Wells haven't delivered a customer car yet, even though Autocar tested one in 2021.

You can a not yet 3 years old Cayman 4.0 GTS with less than 6,000 on the clock for the same money, and I think that you will sell that more easily and lose less on it than you would with a Wells.

Have a look at the company's accounts too. The only director gives his address as the UAE and the liabilities exceed the assets by quite a margin. How many cars will be built before it folds?



Granturadriver

648 posts

272 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Freshly announced new EV car manufacturer with two planned models (speedster and roadster).

www.longbowmotors.com

They want to bring 2x 150 cars into the market in 2026.

Let's wait and see...

QBee

21,567 posts

155 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
crosseyedlion said:
......... since Les & Co took the reigns........
So that's 'king Les, I assume? whistle

Zeb74

413 posts

140 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Antoinne said:
You can a not yet 3 years old Cayman 4.0 GTS with less than 6,000 on the clock for the same money, and I think that you will sell that more easily and lose less on it than you would with a Wells.
For sure, and I could also have bought a Boxster instead of my Chimaera for the same price. But I could also have bought a Toyota Corolla, much more practical, much more reliable and comfortable.
Honestly, for the same price, because I'm a bit masochist I guess, I would sign for a Wells instead of the Porsche. In fact, I think I like to suffer, on the 5 cars I own, 4 of them are English and I live in France wink.

frontfloater

377 posts

153 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Why do both the Wells and Longbow websites only quote ESTIMATED top speed and 0-60 time? Either they haven't made one yet, or they don't dare drive it to its max. Both would make me very suspicious. Especially when you read the Longbow small print down at the asterisk :
"*The performance and efficiency figures quoted are derived from simulated and real-world test results, are provided for comparability purposes only and might not reflect the actual driving experience. "

Elsewhere, Longbow say : "1 of only 150 Limited Editions: Arriving 2026". Hmm - where have we heard that before?

And as well as being ugly, for £84,995 they don't even give you a windscreen. "BUILT LIKE THEY USED TO BE"? Err ... not.

Antoinne

10 posts

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Probably because not even a stunt driver would try and max out one of these cars, let alone a test driver!

crosseyedlion

2,252 posts

209 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
frontfloater said:
Why do both the Wells and Longbow websites only quote ESTIMATED top speed and 0-60 time? Either they haven't made one yet, or they don't dare drive it to its max. Both would make me very suspicious. Especially when you read the Longbow small print down at the asterisk :
"*The performance and efficiency figures quoted are derived from simulated and real-world test results, are provided for comparability purposes only and might not reflect the actual driving experience. "

Elsewhere, Longbow say : "1 of only 150 Limited Editions: Arriving 2026". Hmm - where have we heard that before?

And as well as being ugly, for £84,995 they don't even give you a windscreen. "BUILT LIKE THEY USED TO BE"? Err ... not.
Because they are absolutely not about the numbers. Rolls never used to quote bhp outputs. iirc Gordon Murray didn't quote the figures for the T.50 for a long time

PAUL.S.

2,894 posts

257 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
The number all these outfits never seem to get past is 1, that is the number of cars they ever build!

Viper201

8,135 posts

154 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Like the Wells mentioned above, the 2 directors of Longbow, Davey and Tapscott, are UAE based and call themselves 'entrepreneurs'. Previously called Aetha Motors. Company was formed in August 2023 so if they are producing cars next year that would be a very fast start up.

The 3rd person is Jenny Keisu who is CEO of X Shore, a Swedish electric boating company.


The Three D Mucketeer

6,281 posts

238 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
crosseyedlion said:
Because they are absolutely not about the numbers. Rolls never used to quote bhp outputs. iirc Gordon Murray didn't quote the figures for the T.50 for a long time
What about my brothers 1926 Rolls 20 ? Straight Six 20 Horse Power , successor to the Rolls 10 smile ,

tvrolet

4,485 posts

293 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
The Three D Mucketeer said:
crosseyedlion said:
Because they are absolutely not about the numbers. Rolls never used to quote bhp outputs. iirc Gordon Murray didn't quote the figures for the T.50 for a long time
What about my brothers 1926 Rolls 20 ? Straight Six 20 Horse Power , successor to the Rolls 10 smile ,
O/T but wouldn’t that be the taxation horsepower class? In the early days the rated horsepower of a car or motorcycle was calculated on the formula bore (in inches) squared X number of cylinders / 2.5. So no mention of stroke, valves, revs or anything else that would affect power. So most of the early cars/bikes with a horsepower rating in their name were based on this formula and nothing to do with what the motor actually made.

The Three D Mucketeer

6,281 posts

238 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
tvrolet said:
The Three D Mucketeer said:
crosseyedlion said:
Because they are absolutely not about the numbers. Rolls never used to quote bhp outputs. iirc Gordon Murray didn't quote the figures for the T.50 for a long time
What about my brothers 1926 Rolls 20 ? Straight Six 20 Horse Power , successor to the Rolls 10 smile ,
O/T but wouldn’t that be the taxation horsepower class? In the early days the rated horsepower of a car or motorcycle was calculated on the formula bore (in inches) squared X number of cylinders / 2.5. So no mention of stroke, valves, revs or anything else that would affect power. So most of the early cars/bikes with a horsepower rating in their name were based on this formula and nothing to do with what the motor actually made.
I'll get back to you , My brother is my expert on Henry Royce smile ..... I know nothing , but I know people who do smile
Although thinking about it my Rotavator 5.5 bhp and I can't image 4 of them getting his heavy Rolls up a hill smile
My mistake , confirmed by my Brother, you're perfectly correct. He says it was after WW2 that ratings changed .



Edited by The Three D Mucketeer on Saturday 15th March 13:07

GeneralBanter

1,204 posts

26 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
tvrolet said:
O/T but wouldn’t that be the taxation horsepower class? In the early days the rated horsepower of a car or motorcycle was calculated on the formula bore (in inches) squared X number of cylinders / 2.5. So no mention of stroke, valves, revs or anything else that would affect power. So most of the early cars/bikes with a horsepower rating in their name were based on this formula and nothing to do with what the motor actually made.
Fascinating works well for the Austin 7 and 10.

Gotta dash to tinker with the Ford Mexico 16hp lump.

phazed

22,096 posts

215 months

Sunday 16th March
quotequote all
First Spring run out for the Boxcart!

The “new” TVR office has been taken over by RPE, some car tuning company I believe. Any signs of Les and the car have well gone.


GTRene

18,484 posts

235 months

Sunday 16th March
quotequote all
hm that is news indeed

they escaped in the darkness of th night ;-)

Gareth9702

378 posts

143 months

Sunday 16th March
quotequote all


They have moved to their new production facility in the landscaped parkland surrounding Thruxton.

GTRene

18,484 posts

235 months

Sunday 16th March
quotequote all
Looks promising thumbup