do Drum brakes have any advantages?
Discussion
For non-track use, in a small car, on the rear wheels, I think they're fine. I can't think of any advantages that they have per se, although I suspect they need less workarounds to get a handbrake installed & working - many cars with discs all round have odd setups for the handbrake, con't think of which cars have these kinds of things off-hand, but I have read about them.
Hope this vagueness is of at least some use :P
Ciao
Zak
Hope this vagueness is of at least some use :P
Ciao
Zak
the advantage of drums is that they're more effective than discs!
qualifying statement :
more effective until they build up heat. Drum brakes don't get rid of heat very effectively because of the trapped air inside them, hence water cooling of racing truck brakes, but until then the larget mean effective radius means greater stoppng power for any given frtiction material and application force.
qualifying statement :
more effective until they build up heat. Drum brakes don't get rid of heat very effectively because of the trapped air inside them, hence water cooling of racing truck brakes, but until then the larget mean effective radius means greater stoppng power for any given frtiction material and application force.
wizzpig said:
And you don't get so much brake dust over your alloys
But of course you'd have steel wheels anyway with your retro drums!
There are other technical advantages, like possible self servo effect (though views are mixed on this, and the servo effect can be seen as a disadvantage of drums just as easily!). Cooling is the main drawback however - but again, heat dissipation from disc brakes is seen as an issue in many applications, where water cooled drums might be preferred.
I can't help thinking carbon fibre drum brakes would be a good idea though.
>> Edited by victormeldrew on Monday 6th June 11:02
Drums have better initial bite, but as has already been said, they are unable to dissipate heat as effectively, so braking performance tails off rapidly as they heat up.
They tend to work much better as parking brakes; disc brake handbrake calipers need a lot more leverage to work effectively.
They can also have lower unsprung weight in certain applications, though: the weight of a steel disc and caliper can easily add up to more than a steel lined aluminium drum and the relatively light shoes and slave cylinder.
Jedis (the bike engined Hillclimb single seaters, not the men in cloaks who wave fluorescent tubes around), for example, used to use Mini based drum braking systems for this reason...and, of course, the average UK Hillclimb venue is too short for brake fade to become a problem.
They tend to work much better as parking brakes; disc brake handbrake calipers need a lot more leverage to work effectively.
They can also have lower unsprung weight in certain applications, though: the weight of a steel disc and caliper can easily add up to more than a steel lined aluminium drum and the relatively light shoes and slave cylinder.
Jedis (the bike engined Hillclimb single seaters, not the men in cloaks who wave fluorescent tubes around), for example, used to use Mini based drum braking systems for this reason...and, of course, the average UK Hillclimb venue is too short for brake fade to become a problem.
advantages:
1) the drum brakes are very very well protected compared to the discs, which are the complete opposite.
2) because of the small size & weight of the lower class hatchbacks, drums don't heat up too much, so they're better choice over discs, which are more expensive to install
3) as i said, drums are cheaper in the start, but also they are cheaper to maintain... so cheaper overall
1) the drum brakes are very very well protected compared to the discs, which are the complete opposite.
2) because of the small size & weight of the lower class hatchbacks, drums don't heat up too much, so they're better choice over discs, which are more expensive to install
3) as i said, drums are cheaper in the start, but also they are cheaper to maintain... so cheaper overall
avance70 said:
advantages:
1) the drum brakes are very very well protected compared to the discs, which are the complete opposite.
2) because of the small size & weight of the lower class hatchbacks, drums don't heat up too much, so they're better choice over discs, which are more expensive to install
3) as i said, drums are cheaper in the start, but also they are cheaper to maintain... so cheaper overall
1) I cannot recall ever needing 'drum' protection for rear disc brakes.
2) Not sure whether the argument is price or heat. Either way rear disc brakes on hatchbacks don't really get hot and replacement discs and pads are not expensive compared to drums. Of course the compariosn is a bit spurious ecause you are oftencomparing bigger rear discs from a bigger engine car to the drums of a base model.
3) Not sure about the maintenace. There isn't much to do on rear discs. Disc looks scored - change it. Check pad through caliper nd worn - change it. You don't have to take anythign apart for these maintenace checks.
Gassing Station | Suspension, Brakes & Tyres | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff