24 Hours in Police Custody: Ch4
Discussion
Dashnine said:
And pretty poor quality stuff to it seemed (not that I'm any judge!).
I think if it was these 3 went on to Luton OCG turf, they'd just shoot them - which shocked me a little that Luton has an OCG (i.e. a relatively small place, I naïvely thought OCGs would be only in the bigger cities). Although what makes an OCG over these three other than a tad more organisation (not taking payment via bank transfer etc.) I'm not entirely sure.
It's county lines operation though so were probably working for Luton under eventual duress. I think if it was these 3 went on to Luton OCG turf, they'd just shoot them - which shocked me a little that Luton has an OCG (i.e. a relatively small place, I naïvely thought OCGs would be only in the bigger cities). Although what makes an OCG over these three other than a tad more organisation (not taking payment via bank transfer etc.) I'm not entirely sure.
Dashnine said:
And pretty poor quality stuff to it seemed (not that I'm any judge!).
I think if it was these 3 went on to Luton OCG turf, they'd just shoot them - which shocked me a little that Luton has an OCG (i.e. a relatively small place, I naïvely thought OCGs would be only in the bigger cities). Although what makes an OCG over these three other than a tad more organisation (not taking payment via bank transfer etc.) I'm not entirely sure.
OCG?I think if it was these 3 went on to Luton OCG turf, they'd just shoot them - which shocked me a little that Luton has an OCG (i.e. a relatively small place, I naïvely thought OCGs would be only in the bigger cities). Although what makes an OCG over these three other than a tad more organisation (not taking payment via bank transfer etc.) I'm not entirely sure.
C5_Steve said:
DoubleSix said:
Chauffard said:
KittyLitter said:
In the space of 5 mins, the word 'mate' has been said about 50 times. Why do the police call criminals 'mate' and vice versa?
That is annoying, I notice this quite a bit on TV police procedurals, I'd prefer less matey-ness towards drug dealing gangsters from the arresting coppers and the desk sergeant. Pathetic.
Greendubber said:
C5_Steve said:
DoubleSix said:
Chauffard said:
KittyLitter said:
In the space of 5 mins, the word 'mate' has been said about 50 times. Why do the police call criminals 'mate' and vice versa?
That is annoying, I notice this quite a bit on TV police procedurals, I'd prefer less matey-ness towards drug dealing gangsters from the arresting coppers and the desk sergeant. Pathetic.
The last time I interacted with the Police they referred to me as Mr D6, it seemed to work perfectly well.
I noticed even my plumber avoids the use of “mate” - I assume he deems it unprofessional.
DoubleSix said:
Greendubber said:
C5_Steve said:
DoubleSix said:
Chauffard said:
KittyLitter said:
In the space of 5 mins, the word 'mate' has been said about 50 times. Why do the police call criminals 'mate' and vice versa?
That is annoying, I notice this quite a bit on TV police procedurals, I'd prefer less matey-ness towards drug dealing gangsters from the arresting coppers and the desk sergeant. Pathetic.
The last time I interacted with the Police they referred to me as Mr D6, it seemed to work perfectly well.
I noticed even my plumber avoids the use of “mate” - I assume he deems it unprofessional.
So if you dont 'get it' then there's little point in anyone explaining it to you, again.
Edited by Greendubber on Thursday 5th December 11:16
bishop finger said:
Unreal said:
What's the recognised best way to refer to women then?
Probably their first name. Or a typical lefty do gooder, Labour party POV, "pwwwecious wickle feeeeemayul victimm! "man fault!, man make her steawwl £200,000, jaiwl man instead!!!111 !!1"
I'm asking a reasonable question. It shouldn't be hard for any of the resident BIB to answer it.
Unreal said:
bishop finger said:
Unreal said:
What's the recognised best way to refer to women then?
Probably their first name. Or a typical lefty do gooder, Labour party POV, "pwwwecious wickle feeeeemayul victimm! "man fault!, man make her steawwl £200,000, jaiwl man instead!!!111 !!1"
I'm asking a reasonable question. It shouldn't be hard for any of the resident BIB to answer it.
An old lady who's had her bag stolen would be different to a screaming female drug addict being restrained on the floor by shop security, for example.
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
bishop finger said:
Unreal said:
What's the recognised best way to refer to women then?
Probably their first name. Or a typical lefty do gooder, Labour party POV, "pwwwecious wickle feeeeemayul victimm! "man fault!, man make her steawwl £200,000, jaiwl man instead!!!111 !!1"
I'm asking a reasonable question. It shouldn't be hard for any of the resident BIB to answer it.
An old lady who's had her bag stolen would be different to a screaming female drug addict being restrained on the floor by shop security, for example.
I can quite easily see that sir or madam might be used with elderly victims. I can see that no term is necessary when wrestling in the gutter. It's those more general interactions that I'm interested in.
Just remind me, which of the following sentences cannot function without the introduction of the word "mate" or knowledge of the subject name?:
"Mind your headmate"
"Mate, stop shouting please"
"Listenmate, if you keep swearing I'll knick you"
"Cup of teamate?"
"Okmate, that's enough, move along"
There's no need for it whatsoever. It reflects poorly on the officers and the public (as demonstrated here) doesn't support it, thus eroding much-needed respect. Avoiding its usage should be in a guideline somewhere if it isn't already.
"Mind your head
"
"Listen
"Cup of tea
"Ok
There's no need for it whatsoever. It reflects poorly on the officers and the public (as demonstrated here) doesn't support it, thus eroding much-needed respect. Avoiding its usage should be in a guideline somewhere if it isn't already.
Edited by DoubleSix on Thursday 5th December 12:01
Unreal said:
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
bishop finger said:
Unreal said:
What's the recognised best way to refer to women then?
Probably their first name. Or a typical lefty do gooder, Labour party POV, "pwwwecious wickle feeeeemayul victimm! "man fault!, man make her steawwl £200,000, jaiwl man instead!!!111 !!1"
I'm asking a reasonable question. It shouldn't be hard for any of the resident BIB to answer it.
An old lady who's had her bag stolen would be different to a screaming female drug addict being restrained on the floor by shop security, for example.
I can quite easily see that sir or madam might be used with elderly victims. I can see that no term is necessary when wrestling in the gutter. It's those more general interactions that I'm interested in.
I'll just treat people as I find them, I may not refer to them as anything at all, I might ask them their name and then use that.
There's no need for anyone to die in a ditch over what cops call people. Sometimes it's mate, sometimes it's sir, both have times that are suitable to use them. Some people hate being called sir/madam and accuse you of being patronising so it's horses for courses.
Of all the things to be interested in
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
bishop finger said:
Unreal said:
What's the recognised best way to refer to women then?
Probably their first name. Or a typical lefty do gooder, Labour party POV, "pwwwecious wickle feeeeemayul victimm! "man fault!, man make her steawwl £200,000, jaiwl man instead!!!111 !!1"
I'm asking a reasonable question. It shouldn't be hard for any of the resident BIB to answer it.
An old lady who's had her bag stolen would be different to a screaming female drug addict being restrained on the floor by shop security, for example.
I can quite easily see that sir or madam might be used with elderly victims. I can see that no term is necessary when wrestling in the gutter. It's those more general interactions that I'm interested in.
I'll just treat people as I find them, I may not refer to them as anything at all, I might ask them their name and then use that.
There's no need for anyone to die in a ditch over what cops call people. Sometimes it's mate, sometimes it's sir, both have times that are suitable to use them. Some people hate being called sir/madam and accuse you of being patronising so it's horses for courses.
Of all the things to be interested in
No-one's talking about dying in ditches so God only knows where that came from.
You, amongst others, have defended these informal terms when dealing with males. I can see both sides of the argument.
I don't see what's controversial about questioning the female equivalent but I do find your evasiveness puzzling and your attempt at patronising pathetic.
Unreal said:
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
bishop finger said:
Unreal said:
What's the recognised best way to refer to women then?
Probably their first name. Or a typical lefty do gooder, Labour party POV, "pwwwecious wickle feeeeemayul victimm! "man fault!, man make her steawwl £200,000, jaiwl man instead!!!111 !!1"
I'm asking a reasonable question. It shouldn't be hard for any of the resident BIB to answer it.
An old lady who's had her bag stolen would be different to a screaming female drug addict being restrained on the floor by shop security, for example.
I can quite easily see that sir or madam might be used with elderly victims. I can see that no term is necessary when wrestling in the gutter. It's those more general interactions that I'm interested in.
I'll just treat people as I find them, I may not refer to them as anything at all, I might ask them their name and then use that.
There's no need for anyone to die in a ditch over what cops call people. Sometimes it's mate, sometimes it's sir, both have times that are suitable to use them. Some people hate being called sir/madam and accuse you of being patronising so it's horses for courses.
Of all the things to be interested in
No-one's talking about dying in ditches so God only knows where that came from.
You, amongst others, have defended these informal terms when dealing with males. I can see both sides of the argument.
I don't see what's controversial about questioning the female equivalent but I do find your evasiveness puzzling and your attempt at patronising pathetic.
There is no evasiveness but perhaps find the original thread and quiz the other cops in it and you'll get the answers you seem so keen to get. The internet is a big place so maybe you could do some research and let us all know your findings on the female versions of buddy, mate and fella.
DoubleSix said:
Just remind me, which of the following sentences cannot function without the introduction of the word "mate" or knowledge of the subject name?:
"Mind your headmate"
"Mate, stop shouting please"
"Listenmate, if you keep swearing I'll knick you"
"Cup of teamate?"
"Okmate, that's enough, move along"
There's no need for it whatsoever. It reflects poorly on the officers and the public (as demonstrated here) doesn't support it, thus eroding much-needed respect. Avoiding its usage should be in a guideline somewhere if it isn't already.
All in the opinion of a few, obviously. "Mind your head
"
"Listen
"Cup of tea
"Ok
There's no need for it whatsoever. It reflects poorly on the officers and the public (as demonstrated here) doesn't support it, thus eroding much-needed respect. Avoiding its usage should be in a guideline somewhere if it isn't already.
Edited by DoubleSix on Thursday 5th December 12:01
It's part of the 5 step appeal which is used when trying to de-escalate a situation, which is part of every officers annual personal safety training. So it is already in the guidelines, just not how you want it to be. Look into Betaris box, informal behaviour/communication and non confrontational behaviour will often have a positive effect on the behaviour of people being dealt with.
Write to the college of policing and complain if it's bothering you that much.
Edited by Greendubber on Thursday 5th December 12:47
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff