Harry and Meghan
Discussion
The Spruce Goose said:
DeepEnd said:
Great news!
Thousands of frothy PH angry ranty types give Meghan a massive pile of cash! How generous!
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/02/me...
1.5 million legal costs....Thousands of frothy PH angry ranty types give Meghan a massive pile of cash! How generous!

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/02/me...
Pay 70p or whatever to get angry about Mr Potato Head and see all your money go to Meghan.
Some rather potato like heads might explode!
DeepEnd said:
The Spruce Goose said:
DeepEnd said:
Great news!
Thousands of frothy PH angry ranty types give Meghan a massive pile of cash! How generous!
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/02/me...
1.5 million legal costs....Thousands of frothy PH angry ranty types give Meghan a massive pile of cash! How generous!

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/02/me...
Pay 70p or whatever to get angry about Mr Potato Head and see all your money go to Meghan.
Some rather potato like heads might explode!
DeepEnd said:
The Spruce Goose said:
DeepEnd said:
Great news!
Thousands of frothy PH angry ranty types give Meghan a massive pile of cash! How generous!
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/02/me...
1.5 million legal costs....Thousands of frothy PH angry ranty types give Meghan a massive pile of cash! How generous!

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/02/me...
Pay 70p or whatever to get angry about Mr Potato Head and see all your money go to Meghan.
Some rather potato like heads might explode!
The front page apology, if Megs gets it, will be what will embarrass the Mail.
Disastrous said:
hyphen said:
Countdown said:
hyphen said:
I thinks it's the 'Family' aspect. The Black Sheep/Prodigal Son/ungrateful child type blow ups are always of interest to people.
Why is he the black sheep? I'm not a Royal Watcher but I don't think he's done anything to be particularly ashamed of (once you've discounted the faux-outrage by the likes of the Express). And in relation to "ungrateful" - who cares? I never felt that he owed the Public anything.
What’s the point in having a cake that you can’t eat? A spectacularly pointless turn of phrase that surely must have originated in Yorkshire??
Edited by poolsman on Tuesday 2nd March 22:40
hyphen said:
I trust you know how much DMGT makes? 1.5m is an inconvenience, but not something they will remember.
The front page apology, if Megs gets it, will be what will embarrass the Mail.
I think that Harry will be fairly embarrassed by all of this in a few years' time.The front page apology, if Megs gets it, will be what will embarrass the Mail.
I don't think many people will ever see H and M as being in a genuine relationship, obvious gold digging aside, it could easily be construed as a relationship that has been engineered by a fairly devious, determined, and calculating social climber.
We can all live a life of service.
Servicing our own bank accounts. Nothing more and nothing less.
PH_77 said:
Servicing our own bank accounts. Nothing more and nothing less.
It's not about money, they have money.They are seeking popularity, adulation and power. Harry and Meghan can't sit on the British Throne, so they are creating their own thrones.
Diana wanted to be the People's Princess, and the same is happening here. Harry being chummy on Corden interview was to be a man of the people.
Edited by hyphen on Tuesday 2nd March 23:49
poolsman said:
The point being that if you eat your cake you will no longer "have it". Rather you will have "had it". Put simply - you can't have both. The majority of Yorkshire people understand this - but not necessarily because they are from Yorkshire.
I think everyone understands it. It’s just a stupid saying.Edited by poolsman on Tuesday 2nd March 22:40
But it doesn’t change the main point that if you could have both, you would. And some can.
hyphen said:
It's not about money, they have money.
They are seeking popularity, adulation and power. Harry and Meghan can't sit on the British Throne, so they are creating their own thrones.
Agreed, and their current play is almost certainly down to the fact that they didn't have the sums of money and level of perceived power (and associated perceived influence) that the Meg required when they were playing second fiddle in Frogmore! They are seeking popularity, adulation and power. Harry and Meghan can't sit on the British Throne, so they are creating their own thrones.
Edited by hyphen on Tuesday 2nd March 23:45
Meg for Queen and PM.
I really love listening to their sanctimonious victim bulls

Disastrous said:
poolsman said:
The point being that if you eat your cake you will no longer "have it". Rather you will have "had it". Put simply - you can't have both. The majority of Yorkshire people understand this - but not necessarily because they are from Yorkshire.
I think everyone understands it. It’s just a stupid saying.Edited by poolsman on Tuesday 2nd March 22:40
But it doesn’t change the main point that if you could have both, you would. And some can.
hyphen said:
Diana wanted to be the People's Princess, and the same is happening here. Harry being chummy on Corden interview was to be a man of the people.
The 'People's Princess' thing was a title given to her by the lisping Anthony Blair.Edited by hyphen on Tuesday 2nd March 23:49
hyphen said:
PH_77 said:
Servicing our own bank accounts. Nothing more and nothing less.
It's not about money, they have money.They are seeking popularity, adulation and power. Harry and Meghan can't sit on the British Throne, so they are creating their own thrones.
Diana wanted to be the People's Princess, and the same is happening here. Harry being chummy on Corden interview was to be a man of the people.
Edited by hyphen on Tuesday 2nd March 23:49
poolsman said:
Disastrous said:
poolsman said:
The point being that if you eat your cake you will no longer "have it". Rather you will have "had it". Put simply - you can't have both. The majority of Yorkshire people understand this - but not necessarily because they are from Yorkshire.
I think everyone understands it. It’s just a stupid saying.Edited by poolsman on Tuesday 2nd March 22:40
But it doesn’t change the main point that if you could have both, you would. And some can.
They think they can have both, so good on them if they can.
Reported today said:
A bullying complaint was lodged against the Duchess of Sussex by a senior member of Kensington Palace staff before she and Prince Harry quit as working royals
The Times reported it was made in October 2018 by Jason Knauf, who worked as communications secretary to Harry and Meghan
He is said to have claimed the duchess 'drove two personal assistants out of the household and was undermining the confidence of a third staff member'
Sensationally, the couple's lawyers told the newspaper it was 'being used by Buckingham Palace to peddle a wholly false narrative' before this weekend's interview with Oprah Winfrey
Spicy!The Times reported it was made in October 2018 by Jason Knauf, who worked as communications secretary to Harry and Meghan
He is said to have claimed the duchess 'drove two personal assistants out of the household and was undermining the confidence of a third staff member'
Sensationally, the couple's lawyers told the newspaper it was 'being used by Buckingham Palace to peddle a wholly false narrative' before this weekend's interview with Oprah Winfrey
Disastrous said:
But surely everyone would have their cake and eat it, if they could?
Disastrous said:
I think everyone understands it. It’s just a stupid saying.
But it doesn’t change the main point that if you could have both, you would. And some can.
Are you sure you understand it?!But it doesn’t change the main point that if you could have both, you would. And some can.
anonymoususer said:
Nasty people now trying t say that Princess Megsie has been bullying people when everyone knows she is great and nice and she is the one getting bullied grrrrrr
Also something about wearing 'borrowed' jewelery that was actually a gift from a murderous despot, just after the despot had been extra murderous? The bullying stuff isn't exactly a shock, all that's happened is the details/confirmation emerging.
anonymoususer said:
Nasty people now trying t say that Princess Megsie has been bullying people when everyone knows she is great and nice and she is the one getting bullied grrrrrr
This is not fresh news. I was told about this at least 2 years ago, maybe longer. From what I was told, it's 100% spot on. No specific names from what I recall, but as said, is accurate. I've been told quite a lot about her, not much of it good , really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime. Hosenbugler said:
This is not fresh news. I was told about this at least 2 years ago, maybe longer. From what I was told, it's 100% spot on. No specific names from what I recall, but as said, is accurate. I've been told quite a lot about her, not much of it good , really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime.
"really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime". Why didn't you tell us 2 years ago?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff