Harry and Meghan

[Countdown]

anonymoususer said:

Nasty people now trying t say that Princess Megsie has been bullying people when everyone knows she is great and nice and she is the one getting bullied grrrrrr

Purely coincidental timing.....

[deckster]

Hosenbugler said:

This is not fresh news. I was told about this at least 2 years ago, maybe longer. From what I was told, it's 100% spot on. No specific names from what I recall, but as said, is accurate. I've been told quite a lot about her, not much of it good , really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime.

I heard years back that Hosenbugler blows goats in his spare time. And that he was nasty to a Corgi once.

I can't tell you how I know, but it's 100% spot on.

[anonymoususer]

Hosenbugler said:

anonymoususer said:

Nasty people now trying t say that Princess Megsie has been bullying people when everyone knows she is great and nice and she is the one getting bullied grrrrrr

This is not fresh news. I was told about this at least 2 years ago, maybe longer. From what I was told, it's 100% spot on. No specific names from what I recall, but as said, is accurate. I've been told quite a lot about her, not much of it good , really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime.

Really ? I was once told that if you cant write something nice bout someone don't write at all
Listen i bet I know more about Megsie than you do I never met her but I can tell by the eyes and can tell she's a really nice person

pquinn said:

Also something about wearing 'borrowed' jewelery that was actually a gift from a murderous despot, just after the despot had been extra murderous?

The bullying stuff isn't exactly a shock, all that's happened is the details/confirmation emerging.

Anyone can make mistakes in any case by her wearing them it shows that nice things can come out of truly horrible situations

Edited by anonymoususer on Wednesday 3rd March 10:35

[smn159]

Hosenbugler said:

This is not fresh news. I was told about this at least 2 years ago, maybe longer. From what I was told, it's 100% spot on. No specific names from what I recall, but as said, is accurate. I've been told quite a lot about her, not much of it good , really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime.

Well that's me convinced. You must be very special to have such privileged access

[hyphen]

Telegraph front page

[Randy Winkman]

PH_77 said:

hyphen said:

I trust you know how much DMGT makes? 1.5m is an inconvenience, but not something they will remember.

The front page apology, if Megs gets it, will be what will embarrass the Mail.

I think that Harry will be fairly embarrassed by all of this in a few years' time.

I don't think many people will ever see H and M as being in a genuine relationship, obvious gold digging aside, it could easily be construed as a relationship that has been engineered by a fairly devious, determined, and calculating social climber.

We can all live a life of service.

Servicing our own bank accounts. Nothing more and nothing less.

What particular aspects of her might make people think that? Especially since pretty much none of us knows her at all.

[echazfraz]

I'm going to link to this thread the next time someone posts words to the effect of "I thought this used to be a car forum" or "Mumsnet's that way, snowflake".

250 pages.

Two. Hundred. And. Fifty!

[hyphen]

Randy Winkman said:

What particular aspects of her might make people think that? Especially since pretty much none of us knows her at all.

For me it's the fact that she has been proven to lie.

She and Haz publicly maintained that they had no input into the Finding Freedom book that was written about them, but as part of the Court Case, Mail disputed and found evidence.

Meghan then had to admit to the Court that they were involved.

As such, it is correct to that she/they are manipulative. But again that's not to say that the Royals are not doing similar.

[psi310398]

That’s the last straw!

Unforgotten is being booted out of its slot on ITV to make space for the Oprah interview with these plonkers.

[amgmcqueen]

echazfraz said:

I'm going to link to this thread the next time someone posts words to the effect of "I thought this used to be a car forum" or "Mumsnet's that way, snowflake".

250 pages.

Two. Hundred. And. Fifty!

And yet you're here, contributing to it.

[poo at Paul's]

hyphen said:

Telegraph front page

A terrible attack on her character. Shame on the Racialist Telegraph and them EDL employees who had to leave after years of loyal service.
How dare they! !

[Hosenbugler]

The Mad Monk said:

"really should make the effort and post about what I've been let into sometime".

Why didn't you tell us 2 years ago?

Because a lot of what I'm told is in confidence, NDA's have teeth. Secondly most of this (although not in such specific detail) has been in the press before. It was reports that she was demanding and difficult that prompted me to ask if that was the case. Very much so I was told,very unpopular with staff , to the point of official complaints being made. Press had reported that She had a high staff turnover. Press reports that a staffer had walked were greeted furiously by Meghan, she shouted at other staff in anger, although the report was true. I was told she cannot cope with criticism, be it valid or not. Very prickly.

She seems to have form though. I recall that in the immediate weeks after H&M announced their engagement, there were a lot of murmurings about her in the US media. . A lot of people, most, were positive about her, but there seemed to be quite a number of people who did not seem to like her at all. Some called her a user, others said she would seperate Harry from friends, family etc. Whilst people said various things, the common theme seemed to imply she is a control freak. I thought it all a bit far fetched, but look what has transpired . Whilst I accept that in going through life you are bound to piss somebody off, it seems Meghan made a job of it.

At end of day, from what I am told , petty tittle tattle aside, the majority of what the press say about her in respect of her character, is on the nail. I wish it was not the case, I'm a monarchist , and all this brooha is doing the institutuion no good at all. Very much a square peg in a round hole.

[9.3]

My sister in law works at the Palace. She told me two years ago that the staff there regarded Meghan as a “nightmare” (her words). Kate, on the other hand, is liked hugely.

[Countdown]

hyphen said:

Telegraph front page

Yep...it's still really hard to work out why they flicked the metaphorical "V"s and left the UK...

[smn159]

Countdown said:

hyphen said:

Telegraph front page

Yep...it's still really hard to work out why they flicked the metaphorical "V"s and left the UK...

I can see why the press are getting lathered up - they've lost a court case and potentially lost a cash cow

It's less clear why anyone else gives a toss, particularly when the opinions on here are virtually identical to the hatchet pieces in the Mail / Telegraph.

People getting in a rage about stuff that they have little knowledge and no first hand experience of just because the papers tell them to in the gossip columns is very odd..

[TriumphStag3.0V8]

PH_77 said:

hyphen said:

I trust you know how much DMGT makes? 1.5m is an inconvenience, but not something they will remember.

The front page apology, if Megs gets it, will be what will embarrass the Mail.

I think that Harry will be fairly embarrassed by all of this in a few years' time.

I don't think many people will ever see H and M as being in a genuine relationship, obvious gold digging aside, it could easily be construed as a relationship that has been engineered by a fairly devious, determined, and calculating social climber.

We can all live a life of service.

Servicing our own bank accounts. Nothing more and nothing less.

Oh, come on. Harry is not that bad!

[anonymoususer]

Countdown said:

Purely coincidental timing.....

So Buckingham Palace is now going to look into these nasty stories being told about Princess Megsie
And now we have a poster on here saying he knew about it all years ago but is only saying it now

It wouldn't surprise me if this is all a plot to destroy Meg.
Infiltrate social media and damage the new peoples princess

[purplepenguin]

anonymoususer said:

Countdown said:

Purely coincidental timing.....

So Buckingham Palace is now going to look into these nasty stories being told about Princess Megsie
And now we have a poster on here saying he knew about it all years ago but is only saying it now

It wouldn't surprise me if this is all a plot to destroy Meg.
Infiltrate social media and damage the new peoples princess

Peoples princess - I very much doubt that

[Disastrous]

echazfraz said:

I'm going to link to this thread the next time someone posts words to the effect of "I thought this used to be a car forum" or "Mumsnet's that way, snowflake".

250 pages.

Two. Hundred. And. Fifty!

Well said. Utterly ridiculous. Grown men crying like a bunch of gossiping dinner ladies.

[Earthdweller]

anonymoususer said:

Countdown said:

Purely coincidental timing.....

So Buckingham Palace is now going to look into these nasty stories being told about Princess Megsie
And now we have a poster on here saying he knew about it all years ago but is only saying it now

It wouldn't surprise me if this is all a plot to destroy Meg.
Infiltrate social media and damage the new peoples princess

I wouldn’t be surprised that somebody did know, I’m sure many do know exactly what went on and is still going on

There’s many things that I know professionally about various people and events that I wouldn’t air in public

There are some things I know about the Royals and their behaviour .. and other high profile people, but I’d never say

I’ve seen things discussed on here .. and absolute bks spouted by posters and known the exact timelines and circs of what they are discussing , but I’ve stayed silent even when the events have directly involved me !