Sir Ed Davey - Lib. Dem Leader

Author
Discussion

JuanCarlosFandango

7,787 posts

70 months

Sunday 26th June 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Yes that's a fair point too but I think most people would see a bit of a difference between it being the headline policy v "well you should have read page 15 paragraph 2 we did tell you we were going to take one of your kidneys".

As it was it was their headline policy and we know how that worked out for them.
They could make it a headline policy then. Dress it up a bit. "Our economy is held back by constant political wrangling and an uninformed electorate making irrational decisions based on emotions." Or "For the sake of national unity we need to end all the bickering and work together." It would still be undemocratic IMO, even if it won an election.

Murph7355

37,648 posts

255 months

Sunday 26th June 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Whether you agree with union funding I think there's probably an argument that at least you know why it's there and where it came from isn't there?.....
Yup - the 1970s.

Those days are gone, the RMT just don't want to admit it.

tbf donations to parties across the board need a thorough revisit.

bhstewie said:
People can change their mind in a democracy.

If any party had run on a clear manifesto of "vote for us and we'll rejoin the EU" and won a majority that would have been a democratic mandate to rejoin the EU in my view.

I'm really not sure how it's any different to the next General Election when all sorts will be on the table (though probably not EU related) and people will cast their vote accordingly.
These sort of points always serve to amuse as they get used to support all different angles.

GE's aren't binary choices and are won and lost on multiple policy points.

The EU referendum opened up a bit of a Pandora's box...but as noted above, was a choice by 17m people. Johnson's majority was won by 14m. That's only ever been beaten as an outright number once in our history, by about 125k votes...ironically by John Major smile

Untangling that multiple democratic mess is very far from straightforward!

Personally....I don't think our elected representatives should be able to abrogate (/delegate/donate/transfer - however you want to phrase it) any powers we let them borrow to supranational bodies or anywhere else really. IF there's a good reason to do it, I support putting that to the electorate. And none of that should be done without very clearly defined "escape routes" from that movement of power.

To put that sort of thing to the electorate, having pre-defined rules of engagement would seem like a good idea. Not st made up on the spot.

But none of that is going to happen because no party is going to puh for it, not even the holier than thou (in recent times) LibDems.

turbobloke

103,740 posts

259 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
bhstewie said:
Whether you agree with union funding I think there's probably an argument that at least you know why it's there and where it came from isn't there?.....
Yup - the 1970s.

Those days are gone, the RMT just don't want to admit it.

tbf donations to parties across the board need a thorough revisit.
Yes indeed, starting with unions.

bhstewie said:
People can change their mind in a democracy.
Individually yes of course, but not collectively as a whim though, there are due processes - which happen also to provide some element of safeguarding against whimsical changes occurring and repeating at short notice.

Due process changing the 1970s mentality union funding thing would be a good place to start.

768

13,600 posts

95 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
768 said:
bhstewie said:
"If you vote for us in a General Election we will revoke Article 50" seems a very clear position even if you don't agree with it.

Presumably you didn't vote for them and nor did lots of other people so they didn't get to do what they promised they would if enough people did.

Seems pretty democratic to me.
Does it seem democratic to you to ask the same question multiple times of an electorate and only enact the answers you want to hear?
People can change their mind in a democracy.

If any party had run on a clear manifesto of "vote for us and we'll rejoin the EU" and won a majority that would have been a democratic mandate to rejoin the EU in my view.

I'm really not sure how it's any different to the next General Election when all sorts will be on the table (though probably not EU related) and people will cast their vote accordingly.
I'll take that as a yes. hehe

Electro1980

8,248 posts

138 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Individually yes of course, but not collectively as a whim though, there are due processes - which happen also to provide some element of safeguarding against whimsical changes occurring and repeating at short notice.

Due process changing the 1970s mentality union funding thing would be a good place to start.
Yes, due process. It’s called a general election. You seem to be very keen on sovereignty right up until it is something you don’t like.

As for the unions, in the news today we have barristers threatening to strike and a chronic shortage of dentists. We have a shortage of workers in the UK. Don’t you think perhaps that the number of unions showing discontent and the number of problems we have with filling vital jobs that, perhaps, there is something fundamentally wrong.

bitchstewie

50,767 posts

209 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
768 said:
I'll take that as a yes. hehe
Take it as what you like.

The Lib Dems campaigned with joining the EU as their flagship policy and I didn't vote for them and nor did most of the public.

I didn't whine it was undemocratic as that's how democracy works.

Murph7355

37,648 posts

255 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Take it as what you like.

The Lib Dems campaigned with joining the EU as their flagship policy and I didn't vote for them and nor did most of the public.

I didn't whine it was undemocratic as that's how democracy works.
It's not as simple as that. Or shouldn't be.

I do suspect that their one policy did for them. But that's not really the point. Getting a "mandate" is a pretty complicated thing to determine and needs a lot more consideration than it's given here IMO.

768

13,600 posts

95 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
768 said:
I'll take that as a yes. hehe
Take it as what you like.

The Lib Dems campaigned with joining the EU as their flagship policy and I didn't vote for them and nor did most of the public.

I didn't whine it was undemocratic as that's how democracy works.
And if they'd won the general election the Conservatives could have just asked the public to vote again if they really wanted a Lib Dem win, just in case they changed their minds. And you wouldn't have whined about it. That's how democracy works.

bitchstewie

50,767 posts

209 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Now you're just being daft.

768

13,600 posts

95 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
I think you're just seeing your own logic there.

bitchstewie

50,767 posts

209 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
The scenario I painted is "If you vote for us in the General Election and we win a majority we'll re-join the EU" which is pretty much what the Lib Dems said.

If you want to be Mr Logic about other scenarios then by all means fill your boots but I'd say my scenario is pretty straightforward to most people except the ones who froth at the idea of Brexit ever being "taken away" from them.

768

13,600 posts

95 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
I'd have no issue with a democratic vote on rejoining. But asking the same question twice without enacting the first result isn't democracy.

turbobloke

103,740 posts

259 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Electro1980 said:
turbobloke said:
Individually yes of course, but not collectively as a whim though, there are due processes - which happen also to provide some element of safeguarding against whimsical changes occurring and repeating at short notice.

Due process changing the 1970s mentality union funding thing would be a good place to start.
Yes, due process. It’s called a general election. You seem to be very keen on sovereignty right up until it is something you don’t like.
That makes no sense for two reasons. Firstly I haven't said that I'm keen on sovereignty up to the point of something I don't like, or demonstrated it either. For example I didn't whine for 6 years let alone 13 years after Labour snake oil won the GE vote in 1997 and slithered on to 2010. That was the way the votes went, and the inevitable happened anyway.

Secondly it's nonsense. Due process provides not only a quality check but also one obvious safeguard against whimsical levels of instability.

turbobloke

103,740 posts

259 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
768 said:
I'd have no issue with a democratic vote on rejoining.
Me neither but it's dreamworld for now.

768 said:
But asking the same question twice without enacting the first result isn't democracy.
It's what we've seen since the vote 6 years ago, sore loserville.

As we're out, the EU tactic of repeating a referendum in short order when it gives the result they don't like, no longer applies.

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,102 posts

261 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
apparently, Ed is going to say something today.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64993275


86

2,787 posts

115 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
Carl_Manchester said:
apparently, Ed is going to say something today.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64993275
Ed who ? Waste of space

pquinn

7,167 posts

45 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
I think most people have forgotten the Lib Dems even exist.

Not even useful for a protest vote.

bitchstewie

50,767 posts

209 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
pquinn said:
I think most people have forgotten the Lib Dems even exist.

Not even useful for a protest vote.
If I'm being generous perhaps it's different at a local level but at a national level yes they seem to have simply disappeared from the conversation.

CoolHands

18,496 posts

194 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
86 said:
Carl_Manchester said:
apparently, Ed is going to say something today.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64993275
Ed who ? Waste of space
I just saw this thread and googled the name as I’d genuinely never heard of him. I will now instantly forget about him.

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,102 posts

261 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
it's a bit of a Greek tragedy really, the 2023 lib Dem party, if they think Doncaster is going to turn yellow they are probably being a bit too aspirational.

it's a shame as they had a really opportunity during lockdown to provide some real opposition but they fluffed it.

anyway, it's party conference day and he is going to make his first speech as party leader.