CV19 - Cure Worse Than The Disease? (Vol 18)
Discussion
amgmcqueen said:
55north1west said:
Has Prof Chris Whitty been found yet?
Major disappearing act since predicting Ormigeddon….
Probably fled to Argentina with Vallance...Major disappearing act since predicting Ormigeddon….
Edited by superlightr on Friday 28th January 18:51
bodhi said:
R Mutt said:
And there are still people hysterical over our high cases numbers, and in places like NZ, locking down over EIGHT cases
It's no wonder some people try to explain this reaction on something other than government concerns over public health.
I still can't help feeling this pandemic has been such a clusterfIt's no wonder some people try to explain this reaction on something other than government concerns over public health.
k due to the number of petty bureaucrats and middle managers who have been given power beyond their wildest dreams, and now they have it, they aren't giving it up without a fight. My exhibits to back up my case - N Sturgeon and M Drakeford.
FDA and Pfizer refuse to handover the documents the court has ordered them to release?
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1486506407...
https://thekylebecker.substack.com/p/fda-stonewall...
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/044-P...
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1486506407...
https://thekylebecker.substack.com/p/fda-stonewall...
website said:
The FDA "has now asked the Court to make the public wait until May for it to start producing 55,000 pages per month and, even then, claims it may not be able to meet this rate," Siri writes.
"The FDA’s excuse?" he asked rhetorically. "As explained in the brief opposing the FDA’s request, the FDA’s defense effectively amounts to claiming that the 11 document reviewers it has already assigned and the 17 additional reviewers being onboarded are only capable of reading at the speed of preschoolers."
Court document filed:"The FDA’s excuse?" he asked rhetorically. "As explained in the brief opposing the FDA’s request, the FDA’s defense effectively amounts to claiming that the 11 document reviewers it has already assigned and the 17 additional reviewers being onboarded are only capable of reading at the speed of preschoolers."
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/044-P...
Submission to court said:
The FDA now insists it must delay its first 55,000-page production until May 1, 2022 – four months after the Court entered its order.
However, the FDA’s own papers seeking this delay make plain it can produce at a rate of 55,000 pages per month in February and March.
The FDA affirms it has already “allocated the equivalent of nearly 11 full-time staff to this project” and that “a review speed of 50 documents per hour was within the normal range for document review in a complex matter” in private practice; and here the 50 document per hour rate would be faster since there is only a need to review for personally identifying information (“PII”) for most pages.
Hence, if the FDA’s 11 full-time reviewers work only 7.5 hours per day and review 50 pages (not documents) per hour, the FDA could review over 88,000 pages per month in February and March. That is more than sufficient to produce the 55,000 pages per month currently ordered for these two months.
Instead of complying with this Court’s reasoned order, the FDA claims these 11 reviewers can only review a total of 10,000 pages per month.
What the FDA does not say, and what basic math shows, is that a rate of 10,000 pages a month for 11 full-time reviewers amounts to only 5 pages per hour!
This rate is made even more absurd because most of the pages the FDA will be reviewing during this period are repetitive data files that only require second level review to redact minimal amounts of PII that Pfizer may have left in the documents.
However, the FDA’s own papers seeking this delay make plain it can produce at a rate of 55,000 pages per month in February and March.
The FDA affirms it has already “allocated the equivalent of nearly 11 full-time staff to this project” and that “a review speed of 50 documents per hour was within the normal range for document review in a complex matter” in private practice; and here the 50 document per hour rate would be faster since there is only a need to review for personally identifying information (“PII”) for most pages.
Hence, if the FDA’s 11 full-time reviewers work only 7.5 hours per day and review 50 pages (not documents) per hour, the FDA could review over 88,000 pages per month in February and March. That is more than sufficient to produce the 55,000 pages per month currently ordered for these two months.
Instead of complying with this Court’s reasoned order, the FDA claims these 11 reviewers can only review a total of 10,000 pages per month.
What the FDA does not say, and what basic math shows, is that a rate of 10,000 pages a month for 11 full-time reviewers amounts to only 5 pages per hour!
This rate is made even more absurd because most of the pages the FDA will be reviewing during this period are repetitive data files that only require second level review to redact minimal amounts of PII that Pfizer may have left in the documents.
RSTurboPaul said:
Is anyone else finding Twitter is no longer allowing you to freely scroll through a poster's history, and instead stopping you after one scroll, with an pop-up to log in or sign up?
I can't even open a link to a direct tweet and play a video on it FFS
Yep, Instagram does the same now too I can't even open a link to a direct tweet and play a video on it FFS
Oneball said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Is anyone else finding Twitter is no longer allowing you to freely scroll through a poster's history, and instead stopping you after one scroll, with an pop-up to log in or sign up?
I can't even open a link to a direct tweet and play a video on it FFS
Yep, Instagram does the same now too I can't even open a link to a direct tweet and play a video on it FFS
Our friend Klaus explains how wide-ranging the organisations (potentially) under the influence of his organisation are.
https://twitter.com/LFCNewsMedia/status/1475876136...
https://twitter.com/LFCNewsMedia/status/1475876136...
johnboy1975 said:
Try this:
https://youtu.be/NyASSAfdM18
@50 mins 30 seconds, a listener emails with an identical situation.
"Essential care giver status" is an exemption youmay should be able to claim
Thats brilliant, thank youhttps://youtu.be/NyASSAfdM18
@50 mins 30 seconds, a listener emails with an identical situation.
"Essential care giver status" is an exemption you
Will email care home and request visit on that basis and see what they say
Uncle Klaus explains to the John F Kennedy School of Government in 2017 how alumni of the Young Global Leader program are leading countries (Canada, France, Germany, Russia(?!)... a remarkable 'hit rate', surely?) and how the WEF has penetrated the Cabinets of the world - including half of the Canadian Cabinet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBptbnoPA80
And a longer version (with added cynical Tin Foil commentary and dramatic background music, but) with additional detail on how 'Global Shapers' are working in more than 450 cities around the world and have 'a different mindset' and are working in 'global terms' not 'national terms':
https://odysee.com/@Verity_Proletaria:5/to-conquer...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBptbnoPA80
And a longer version (with added cynical Tin Foil commentary and dramatic background music, but) with additional detail on how 'Global Shapers' are working in more than 450 cities around the world and have 'a different mindset' and are working in 'global terms' not 'national terms':
https://odysee.com/@Verity_Proletaria:5/to-conquer...
Biggus thingus said:
johnboy1975 said:
Try this:
https://youtu.be/NyASSAfdM18
@50 mins 30 seconds, a listener emails with an identical situation.
"Essential care giver status" is an exemption youmay should be able to claim
Thats brilliant, thank youhttps://youtu.be/NyASSAfdM18
@50 mins 30 seconds, a listener emails with an identical situation.
"Essential care giver status" is an exemption you
Will email care home and request visit on that basis and see what they say
Keep us posted. We had some discussion on this around 7am this morning on the previous volume, opinion was it depends how hard you push (and how hard they dig their heels in)
AIUI you have the law on your side.
Edit
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Vanden Saab said:
There was only a very short period between April and May 2020 when visitors were not allowed, unfortunately it seems individual care homes and hospitals ignored and are still ignoring both gov. and NHS guidance and have continued this travesty of not allowing visitors. If you hassle those in charge including those at the very top enough as my Ex wife did when her father was in hospital on end of life care you will find exceptions can be made. You do need to be very determined though. wink
Edited by johnboy1975 on Friday 28th January 19:44
Biggus thingus said:
johnboy1975 said:
Try this:
https://youtu.be/NyASSAfdM18
@50 mins 30 seconds, a listener emails with an identical situation.
"Essential care giver status" is an exemption youmay should be able to claim
Thats brilliant, thank youhttps://youtu.be/NyASSAfdM18
@50 mins 30 seconds, a listener emails with an identical situation.
"Essential care giver status" is an exemption you
Will email care home and request visit on that basis and see what they say
in particular this...
guidance said:
every care home resident should be supported to have an identified essential care giver (in addition to their named visitors) who may visit the home to offer companionship or help with care needs – essential care givers should be able to visit inside the care home even during periods of outbreak affecting the care home
You know Long Covid in kids...yeah, about that...The first large study on long-Covid in children (>100k kids), well designed and with a proper control group:
Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS‑CoV‑2 positive children— a nationwide cohort study
study said:
Most children have a mild course of acute COVID-19. Only few mainly non-controlled studies with small sample size have evaluated long-term recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate symptoms and durationof ‘long COVID’ in children. A nationwide cohort study of 37,522 children aged 0–17 years with RT-PCR verified SARS-CoV-2 infection (response rate 44.9%) and a control group of 78,037 children (response rate 21.3%). An electronic questionnaire was sent to all children from March 24th until May 9th, 2021. Symptoms lasting>4 weeks were common among both SARS-CoV-2 children and controls. However, SARS-CoV-2 children aged 6–17 years reported symptoms more frequently than the control group (percent difference 0.8%). The most reported symptoms among pre-school children were fatigue Risk Difference (RD) 0.05 (CI 0.04–0.06), loss of smell RD 0.01 (CI 0.01–0.01), loss of taste RD 0.01 (CI 0.01–0.02) and muscle weakness RD 0.01 (CI 0.00–0.01). among school children the most significant symptoms were loss of smell RD 0.12 (CI 0.12–0.13), loss of taste RD 0.10 (CI 0.09–0.10), fatigue RD 0.05 (CI 0.05–0.06), respiratory problems RD 0.03 (CI 0.03–0.04), dizziness RD 0.02 (CI 0.02–0.03), muscle weakness RD 0.02 (CI 0.01–0.02) and chest pain RD 0.01 (CI 0.01–0.01). Children in the control group experienced significantly more concentration difficulties, headache, muscle and joint pain, cough, nausea, diarrhoea and fever than SARS-CoV-2 infected. In most children ‘long COVID’ symptoms resolved within 1–5 months.
Conclusions: Long COVID in children is rare and mainly of short duration.
Conclusions: Long COVID in children is rare and mainly of short duration.
Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS‑CoV‑2 positive children— a nationwide cohort study
g3org3y said:
You know Long Covid in kids...yeah, about that...The first large study on long-Covid in children (>100k kids), well designed and with a proper control group:
Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS?CoV?2 positive children— a nationwide cohort study
"Children in the control group experienced significantly more concentration difficulties, headache, muscle and joint pain, cough, nausea, diarrhea and fever than SARS-CoV-2 infected"...?study said:
Most children have a mild course of acute COVID-19. Only few mainly non-controlled studies with small sample size have evaluated long-term recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate symptoms and durationof ‘long COVID’ in children. A nationwide cohort study of 37,522 children aged 0–17 years with RT-PCR verified SARS-CoV-2 infection (response rate 44.9%) and a control group of 78,037 children (response rate 21.3%). An electronic questionnaire was sent to all children from March 24th until May 9th, 2021. Symptoms lasting>4 weeks were common among both SARS-CoV-2 children and controls. However, SARS-CoV-2 children aged 6–17 years reported symptoms more frequently than the control group (percent difference 0.8%). The most reported symptoms among pre-school children were fatigue Risk Difference (RD) 0.05 (CI 0.04–0.06), loss of smell RD 0.01 (CI 0.01–0.01), loss of taste RD 0.01 (CI 0.01–0.02) and muscle weakness RD 0.01 (CI 0.00–0.01). among school children the most significant symptoms were loss of smell RD 0.12 (CI 0.12–0.13), loss of taste RD 0.10 (CI 0.09–0.10), fatigue RD 0.05 (CI 0.05–0.06), respiratory problems RD 0.03 (CI 0.03–0.04), dizziness RD 0.02 (CI 0.02–0.03), muscle weakness RD 0.02 (CI 0.01–0.02) and chest pain RD 0.01 (CI 0.01–0.01). Children in the control group experienced significantly more concentration difficulties, headache, muscle and joint pain, cough, nausea, diarrhoea and fever than SARS-CoV-2 infected. In most children ‘long COVID’ symptoms resolved within 1–5 months.
Conclusions: Long COVID in children is rare and mainly of short duration.
Conclusions: Long COVID in children is rare and mainly of short duration.
Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS?CoV?2 positive children— a nationwide cohort study
Sounds to me like Covid is something that would benefit kids, then?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff