The next 5 years with Labour?
Discussion
chrispmartha said:
pheonix478 said:
b
hstewie said:
hstewie said: Yeah I'd probably try to move it away from some members attitudes towards women and the lack of challenge of those attitudes too.
If you want to know my views on Haigh go read the Haigh thread it's all on there.
Oh please. The moral posturing is absolutely pathetic. If vivid raid hair isn't a giant red flag on a 40 year old I don't know what is. Of course that's not to say she can't do her job. No, getting fired suggests she's not very good at her job and getting a stupid criminal conviction suggests she's a fckung idiot. The hair is coincidental and irrelevant save for those desperate to defend her pathetic, criminal behavior.If you want to know my views on Haigh go read the Haigh thread it's all on there.
Edited by pheonix478 on Saturday 30th November 12:18
Evanivitch said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
It is indeed. those who support the left, would have been screaming like stuck pigs, if the useless tories had done even a fraction of the nonsense, that labour have indulged in, in the few months they have been in office.
Short memories in here. It seems labour supporter's memories come to a complete halt at the 14 years mark, so that they can ignore the shambles that labour left the country in, when they last got kicked out.
The only difference is that the useless tories didn't keep squawking 22 billion black hole! or 14 year of failure soundbites,! like a demented parrot, every time someone questions why they have done what they have done.
Everyone knows it is just a myth put out by labour, intended to fool the hard of thinking.
If the useless tories had been so bad, why did the people of the UK vote them into No10, THREE times during that period?
If there WAS a 22 billion pound black hole in the country's finances, where did labour find the 6 billion pounds to give their union cronies, (like the already on 70 thousand pounds a year) train drivers an above inflation pay rise?
Where are they getting the 11.6 billion pounds they want to throw away on over seas climate change aid from?
Surely if there really was a 22 billion pound black hole in the country's finances, you would have to fill that black hole first, BEFORE splashing billions more pounds away on rewarding their union cronies, and handing out cash to over seas territories?
Pan Pan Pan said:
Nope. My memory extends beyond the 14 year of failure myth, used by labour, to give them excuses for what they have been doing, since they got into office.
It seems labour supporter's memories come to a complete halt at the 14 years mark, so that they can ignore the shambles that labour left the country in, when they last got kicked out.
The only difference is that the useless tories didn't keep squawking 22 billion black hole! or 14 year of failure soundbites,! like a demented parrot, every time someone questions why they have done what they have done.
Everyone knows it is just a myth put out by labour, intended to fool the hard of thinking.
If the useless tories had been so bad, why did the people of the UK vote them into No10, THREE times during that period?
If there WAS a 22 billion pound black hole in the country's finances, where did labour find the 6 billion pounds to give their union cronies, (like the already on 70 thousand pounds a year) train drivers an above inflation pay rise?
Where are they getting the 11.6 billion pounds they want to throw away on over seas climate change aid from?
Surely if there really was a 22 billion pound black hole in the country's finances, you would have to fill that black hole first, BEFORE splashing billions more pounds away on rewarding their union cronies, and handing out cash to over seas territories?
The statement above, ( thank you Pan Pan Pan), is absolutely spot on. Their sheer incompetence is astounding, but not only that - The new Chancellor seems to be totally deaf and blind to the comments and feedback from every conceivable business source, that are telling her the budget is an utter failure. We are heading for more inflation, and more staff being laid off etc. It seems labour supporter's memories come to a complete halt at the 14 years mark, so that they can ignore the shambles that labour left the country in, when they last got kicked out.
The only difference is that the useless tories didn't keep squawking 22 billion black hole! or 14 year of failure soundbites,! like a demented parrot, every time someone questions why they have done what they have done.
Everyone knows it is just a myth put out by labour, intended to fool the hard of thinking.
If the useless tories had been so bad, why did the people of the UK vote them into No10, THREE times during that period?
If there WAS a 22 billion pound black hole in the country's finances, where did labour find the 6 billion pounds to give their union cronies, (like the already on 70 thousand pounds a year) train drivers an above inflation pay rise?
Where are they getting the 11.6 billion pounds they want to throw away on over seas climate change aid from?
Surely if there really was a 22 billion pound black hole in the country's finances, you would have to fill that black hole first, BEFORE splashing billions more pounds away on rewarding their union cronies, and handing out cash to over seas territories?
How on earth can Labour think they will grow the economy with their doomed budget decisions. It'll never happen.
Condi said:
chrispmartha said:
Red flag? For what?
For being different. Doesn't matter if they're foreign, black, Asian, have red hair or blue hair, it's just easier to dislike and be suspicious of anyone different...It's WACIST!
No. People sport unconventional looks for attention. Suggesting someone who's nearly 40 and still trying to be edgy is tragic isn't like disliking someone because they're black. Dear god. Get a grip.
chrispmartha said:
pheonix478 said:
No. People sport unconventional looks for attention. .
People have their hair and wear clothes how they want because they like them, just as I’m presuming you do?
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Hair colour. Clothes. Being "permitted" to keep a maiden name.
Proper Handmaid's Tale vibes this last couple of days.
What on earth are you babbling about? Haigh is allowed to wear whatever she likes, call herself what she likes or have red hair, no one has said she shouldn't. The flip side to that is that I'm allowed to think she looks a bit tragic. It wasn't me who fired her, it was your man Sir Keir. Any comment on the sky article?Proper Handmaid's Tale vibes this last couple of days.
pheonix478 said:
119 said:
Well, at least we haven’t got a convicted criminal in parliament now.
Astonishing lack of intelligence from Starmer but I should be be surprised really.
She's still an MP, just fired as minister.Astonishing lack of intelligence from Starmer but I should be be surprised really.
Not someone who can make important decisions is probably more apt.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff