Another BBC Presenter in Trouble, Gregg Wallace
Discussion
Countdown said:
Looking at him you wouldn't have thought that he was the pervy type.................
I mean, you might suggest that he isn’t any more “pervy” than your average market trader in their 50s/60s might be, which is sort of what he is. It’s just the ability to filter it accordingly having got a job in telly that seems to be his issue.I’m not condoning his behaviour, but he isn’t Savile. His ‘common man’ routine is his entire act, but it seems rather than being an “act” it’s just who he is, including the cringeworthy “banter” bit.
The list of allegations doesn't read well does it.
'Rigorous' law firm to lead Wallace probe - MasterChef producers
'Rigorous' law firm to lead Wallace probe - MasterChef producers
Alex Z said:
CallThatMusic said:
I have no time for this guy and avoid any programme he is on.
What I think is curious is his apparent interest in the logistics of lesbian sex.
Where was he expecting the conversation to go….
I didn’t like his “shout questions and pretend to be surprised by answers” shtick on most of the shows he did, so found him easy to avoid. What I think is curious is his apparent interest in the logistics of lesbian sex.
Where was he expecting the conversation to go….
As for the mechanics of lesbian sex, I don’t think it’s that surprising that straight men are interested, but if there is one thing the internet is good for, it’s videos that will make it all clear. Asking actual lesbians you don’t know about it just comes across as really creepy.
I think he wanted to hear about sheds and lorries.
I think that’s logistics rather than lesbian sex but I’m not qualified to talk about either.
bhstewie said:
The list of allegations doesn't read well does it.
'Rigorous' law firm to lead Wallace probe - MasterChef producers
It certainly doesn't. If I had done that at any firm I worked at in the last thirty years, it would have been instant dismissal.'Rigorous' law firm to lead Wallace probe - MasterChef producers
andyA700 said:
It certainly doesn't. If I had done that at any firm I worked at in the last thirty years, it would have been instant dismissal.
It's what I find so strange with some of the comments.I kind of get it if people haven't read the allegations but to have read them and still think it's banter or been overdone or whatever?
Behave.
Southerner said:
Countdown said:
Looking at him you wouldn't have thought that he was the pervy type.................
I mean, you might suggest that he isn’t any more “pervy” than your average market trader in their 50s/60s might be, which is sort of what he is. It’s just the ability to filter it accordingly having got a job in telly that seems to be his issue.I’m not condoning his behaviour, but he isn’t Savile. His ‘common man’ routine is his entire act, but it seems rather than being an “act” it’s just who he is, including the cringeworthy “banter” bit.
theboss said:
Mastodon2 said:
Biker 1 said:
Telegraph article earlier was a little more graphic than 'inappropriate jokes'. If any of the more lurid details are true, why didn't the other presenters & production crew step up to the plate?
For those of us who aren't subscribers of the Telegraph, what is he alleged to have said or done?Maybe he’s just
bhstewie said:
andyA700 said:
It certainly doesn't. If I had done that at any firm I worked at in the last thirty years, it would have been instant dismissal.
It's what I find so strange with some of the comments.I kind of get it if people haven't read the allegations but to have read them and still think it's banter or been overdone or whatever?
Behave.
"A female worker on the BBC Good Food Show in 2010, who said Wallace stared at her chest"
Also allegations are just that. Some random could make allegations about me but that doesn't make it true.
TX.
Terminator X said:
bhstewie said:
andyA700 said:
It certainly doesn't. If I had done that at any firm I worked at in the last thirty years, it would have been instant dismissal.
It's what I find so strange with some of the comments.I kind of get it if people haven't read the allegations but to have read them and still think it's banter or been overdone or whatever?
Behave.
"A female worker on the BBC Good Food Show in 2010, who said Wallace stared at her chest"
Also allegations are just that. Some random could make allegations about me but that doesn't make it true.
TX.
CardinalBlue said:
jdw100 said:
Sadly not - he did a TV interview a few days afterwards defending it. bhstewie said:
The list of allegations doesn't read well does it.
'Rigorous' law firm to lead Wallace probe - MasterChef producers
I simply don't believe this allegation can be true..'Rigorous' law firm to lead Wallace probe - MasterChef producers
BBC News also heard from a former MasterChef worker who says Wallace showed her topless pictures of himself and asked for massages.
Because if you read that magazine article of his typical Saturday, he clearly has no time for massages as he's playing Total War Saga: Thrones of Britanna all day.
hidetheelephants said:
theboss said:
Mastodon2 said:
Biker 1 said:
Telegraph article earlier was a little more graphic than 'inappropriate jokes'. If any of the more lurid details are true, why didn't the other presenters & production crew step up to the plate?
For those of us who aren't subscribers of the Telegraph, what is he alleged to have said or done?Maybe he’s just
Why do people keep mentioning Epstein or Savile and why are people focusing on the stuff like staring at a staff members chest?
Are those two now considered the benchmark before it's considered unacceptable behaviour or something?
Many of the allegations are absolutely vile and just not what you expect in any workplace.
Are those two now considered the benchmark before it's considered unacceptable behaviour or something?
Many of the allegations are absolutely vile and just not what you expect in any workplace.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff