Transport Secretary Louise Haigh admits pleading guilty

Transport Secretary Louise Haigh admits pleading guilty

Author
Discussion

TonyToniTone

Original Poster:

3,700 posts

257 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Transport Secretary Louise Haigh has admitted pleading guilty to an offence connected with misleading the police while a parliamentary candidate in 2014, Sky News can reveal.

Sky News understands Ms Haigh appeared at Camberwell Green Magistrates' Court six months before the 2015 general election, after making a false report to officers that her mobile phone had been stolen.

It's understood her conviction is now classified as 'spent'.

However, three separate sources claimed she made the false report to benefit personally, with two of the sources alleging she wanted a more modern work handset that was being rolled out to her colleagues at the time.

https://news.sky.com/story/transport-secretary-lou...

LimmerickLad

2,264 posts

23 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
And now over to Stewie our "corrupt politicians" correspondent at Labour HQ.

J210

4,692 posts

191 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
She was shadow minister of policing for 3 years…..

bitchstewie

55,431 posts

218 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Toast hopefully.

Be interesting to see if Starmer has the appetite to do so.

Dingu

4,398 posts

38 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Should mean she appeals to a lot of the NP&E gang a lot more then!

Mr Penguin

2,752 posts

47 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Toast hopefully.

Be interesting to see if Starmer has the appetite to do so.
Unlikely although it is inconsistent.

anonymoususer

6,630 posts

56 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
I think she should be allowed to keep her job.
The solicitor who advised her should however be named, shamed and barred from ever soliciting again.
Clearly this is the fault of the solicitor
Louise should be applauded for having the bravery and decency to admit this after having been caught out.
I knew she was a different kind of woman once I saw her hair colour.

scenario8

6,857 posts

187 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
It’s all a little pathetic, is it not?









(Nokia 105 user - provided by my employer)

Ridgemont

7,213 posts

139 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Toast hopefully.

Be interesting to see if Starmer has the appetite to do so.
Unlikely. He’s sat on a 150 seat majority.
He hasn’t, and won’t, show any inclination to do the ‘right thing’.

I’m sure we will get used to this over the next 5 years.

Once Labour start getting hammered at locals the mood music may change but we just get to sit back and relax as the gov just ignores everything.

essayer

9,664 posts

202 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Yeah, she’s toast.



“My solicitor advised me not to comment during that interview and I regret following that advice.. I appeared before Southwark magistrates.. Under the advice of my solicitor I pleaded guilty - despite the fact this was a genuine mistake from which I did not make any gain.”


andygo

6,976 posts

263 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
essayer said:
Yeah, she’s toast.



“My solicitor advised me not to comment during that interview and I regret following that advice.. I appeared before Southwark magistrates.. Under the advice of my solicitor I pleaded guilty - despite the fact this was a genuine mistake from which I did not make any gain.”
My solicitor advised me not to comment during that interview and I regret following that advice.. I appeared before Southwark magistrates.. Under the advice of my solicitor I pleaded guilty - despite the fact this was a genuine mistake from which I did not make any gain, despite my best effort to do so.

Murph7355

38,976 posts

264 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
LimmerickLad said:
And now over to Stewie our "corrupt politicians" correspondent at Labour HQ.
Old Threadstarter's trigger finger has become way less itchy in the last few months.

Earthdweller

14,494 posts

134 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Would a conviction for fraud have disbarred her for standing for Parliament?

Presumably she didn't declare it


Of course if Rachel Reeves hadn't invented the mobile phone ....

essayer

9,664 posts

202 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Only if given a 1yr+ custodial sentence. She received a discharge and there is no obligation for candidates to disclose criminal convictions so presumably her CLP kept it hidden or didn’t know themselves

Who_Goes_Blue

1,225 posts

179 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
State of it

768

15,256 posts

104 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
LimmerickLad said:
And now over to Stewie our "corrupt politicians" correspondent at Labour HQ.
Old Threadstarter's trigger finger has become way less itchy in the last few months.
Lying certainly doesn't seem to be the triggering issue it once was.

munroman

1,883 posts

192 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
She's clearing her desk right now.

119

9,768 posts

44 months

Thursday 28th November
quotequote all
LimmerickLad said:
And now over to Stewie our "corrupt politicians" correspondent at Labour HQ.
rofl

CoolHands

19,516 posts

203 months

Friday 29th November
quotequote all
Pleaded guilty.

Her whole statement is minimising her actions to the maximum possible. Wasn’t her fault, pleaded guilty even though innocent (eh?), given a discharge - “the lowest possible outcome”

Own up for gods sake

Was she even mugged scratchchin

Southerner

1,795 posts

60 months

Friday 29th November
quotequote all
“Some time later I discovered that the mobile in question had not been taken. In the interim I had been issued with another work phone.”

“The original work device being switched on triggered police attention and I was asked to come in for questioning.“

Is it normal for police to have a sufficient level of interest in a reportedly nicked mobile phone to be monitoring whether it’s switched on? Crime reference number and move on, surely. Or might the employer have noticed it come back to life and made their own report to the police, I wonder? All a bit cryptic.

I think she’ll ride it out, SKS will do damage limitation, “honest mistake” etc.

Edited by Southerner on Friday 29th November 04:00