Naomi Campbell - want to punch so hard!
Discussion
Tiggsy said:
While she's an odd ball....back then why would she know what a "blood diamond" was? I wouldnt have had a clue prior to the movie! I might have thought the way i was given it was dubious but hardly something to put me in court years later!
Agreed. It is fair to assume she had no concept as to the origin of the stones.
It is also fair to assume that one random evening out of hundreds, over 13 years ago and the story would be patchy and have discrepencies.
It is fair to assume that her ex manager has a grudge and her testimony could be bias.
It is logical to assume that NC took excellent legal council beforehand and was advised as to what to say and not to say.
It would be logical to assume that she would be scared and reluctant to appear given that CT is a blood thirsty mentalist.
It would be fair to assume that the presence of Mandella would make you believe that others within that small group were legitimate.
It is finally fair to assume that none of us can be logically offended by any of the above events but be utterly disgusted by the 'inconvenience' remark which was a casual, and therefor natural, throw away remark made when 100% appraised of what had been going on in Sierra Leone, DR Congo and Liberia.
It was that final remark which gave the clearest view into the machinations of that individuals. Clues to which had only previously been suggested by a bias media with an agenda of selling copy.
DonkeyApple said:
Tiggsy said:
While she's an odd ball....back then why would she know what a "blood diamond" was? I wouldnt have had a clue prior to the movie! I might have thought the way i was given it was dubious but hardly something to put me in court years later!
Agreed. It is fair to assume she had no concept as to the origin of the stones.
It is also fair to assume that one random evening out of hundreds, over 13 years ago and the story would be patchy and have discrepencies.
It is fair to assume that her ex manager has a grudge and her testimony could be bias.
It is logical to assume that NC took excellent legal council beforehand and was advised as to what to say and not to say.
It would be logical to assume that she would be scared and reluctant to appear given that CT is a blood thirsty mentalist.
It would be fair to assume that the presence of Mandella would make you believe that others within that small group were legitimate.
It is finally fair to assume that none of us can be logically offended by any of the above events but be utterly disgusted by the 'inconvenience' remark which was a casual, and therefor natural, throw away remark made when 100% appraised of what had been going on in Sierra Leone, DR Congo and Liberia.
It was that final remark which gave the clearest view into the machinations of that individuals. Clues to which had only previously been suggested by a bias media with an agenda of selling copy.
Apologies if it's a pearoast but the mash does it again
I thought the stories were mostly the same.
2 bloke come to the door and deliver stone/or stones.
The only real difference seems to be that NC said she didn't know who they were from(b
ks) and the manager said she did. As I understand they are trying to prove he traded diamonds, there is no debate about how NC 'earned' them. By saying she didn't know where they came from she has proved useless.
I thought the stories were mostly the same.
2 bloke come to the door and deliver stone/or stones.
The only real difference seems to be that NC said she didn't know who they were from(b
ks) and the manager said she did. As I understand they are trying to prove he traded diamonds, there is no debate about how NC 'earned' them. By saying she didn't know where they came from she has proved useless.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff