Discussion
wiggy001 said:
Collectingbrass said:
Sheepshanks said:
theboss said:
Everything assumes in divorce that they will have some grand day in court where a judge takes account of both their stories in detail and hands down a judgement. In reality if you need a judge to make decisions that can’t be made directly between the warring parties then you’ve failed and burned a boat load of marital capital in the process. I appreciate in some cases it’s unavoidable where one party is reasonable and the other is impossible, but generally speaking most people can and do reach an agreement.
Even if the split is agreed, it still has to be signed off by the Court as being fair doesn’t it? Our friends ex-husband is prepared to walk away with a modest cash settlement - her solicitor thinks it’s unlikely she’ll be able to keep her pension intact which she’s banking on as she hasn’t got long before she can retire.
It cost me a lot financially but I am in a great place now. This week my final matter with my solicitor was closed, 18 months and over £60k since I first met my solicitor again. And I can honestly say I would do it all again in a heartbeat to maintain my excellent relationship with my children if nothing else.
I didn't go 'all the way' in my own divorce proceedings, we had three hearings and then settled at FDR for the financial order. Combined costs about £50k to get that far and I was told to expect the same again if it went to final hearing. Not really very good value when the outcome was no different to anything we could have accomplished ourselves by email. We literally paid £12k just for the FDR, to rent a small room each for a few hours and have messages proxied via our solicitors having chats in the corridor. But as you know too well yourself, sometimes one party makes it absolutely necessary even when the other wants to negotiate reasonably in and good faith.
Edited by theboss on Friday 21st March 19:29
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff