The Official Manchester United Thread (Vol 12)

The Official Manchester United Thread (Vol 12)

Author
Discussion

CountyAFC

2,434 posts

15 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
5 years? Not a chance in hell.

Gone a bit AMG

7,120 posts

209 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
What a lovely shiny new home we are going to have. It looks fking amazing and I cannot wait. The experience at City on a match day is light years ahead so this will close one gap to them and being able to welcome nearly twice as many fans to a match day will seriously increase match day revenue.

The government has already given its support including Rachel from accounts and the regeneration of what is an underused old industrial area will have investors falling over them selves.

Public transport is already in place as the Metrolink extension to the Trafford centre already stops right where the new ground will be, well about 100m away and the deal has already been done with the shipping container company for their land. The concern over bridges from our Liverpool supporting friends whilst admirable is pretty irrelevant considering those bridges swing or are high enough for some pretty fking big arse ships to float through.

They’ll only be Barcelona with a bigger stadium in Europe. Yep my tickets will go up but if it means I’m no longer paying £3.40 for a warm bottle of carling or £4.50 for a pint of madri and can have a decent beer that benefits United on the way in then bring it on. Love the whole covering the concourses outside concept.

Oh and Big Jim or the Jim Reaper, that’s made me chuckle, has a bit of experience in negotiating multi billion pound infrastructure projects.

As for results on the pitch, spurs sell out every week and they’ve got an even smaller fan base than City and are just as st as we are. Plus you can get the tram from the airport for all those coffer swelling tourists.

FlyingTrotter

358 posts

167 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
Good positivity

Any distinctive stadium design that isn’t just a bowl like Everton City Arsenal or Spurs is bound to attract mixed views - the towers has a bit of a circus tent or Minehead Butlins vibe but that in the CGI and in reality I’m sure it will be spectacular- any stadium with 100k is bound to be enormous - the Spurs one is small by comparison and I have sat up at the top and it’s seriously high and I felt a bit of vertigo and as if above the atmosphere - that roof might make it feel more enclosed

The idea of the huge covered courtyard is brilliant and should make it a real event to go early and so make the club far more money on match days and help on those very rare days when it rains in Manchester 😀

MiniMan64

17,918 posts

202 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
First thought was circus tent but looking again I can see what they’re going for with the trident thing.

towser44

3,779 posts

127 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
redstar1 said:
franki68 said:
Didn’t he say or suggest that without government investment
into the area for regeneration it wouldn’t happen anyway ?
Govt investment is needed to move the freight yards I would think before anything else happens.

Also I don't see how they get anything big up the ship canal without dismantling some bridges.....
All the bridges that are low swing or lift. Plenty of ships still go up the canal to Irlam on a regular basis. Makes sense, they could likely only transport maybe 60 - 80 foot long steel sections by road and that would mean numerous abnormal loads on the road. Taking them by ship up the canal means they'll be able to transport much longer sections and multiples of them at a time.

and31

3,948 posts

139 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
I like it a lot, but I’ll be amazed if it’s done in five years

Daz68

3,500 posts

222 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
and31 said:
I like it a lot, but I’ll be amazed if it’s done in five years
It will become the new HS2 fiasco. Be well over budget and non viable.

HairyMaclary

3,743 posts

207 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
Fast Bug said:
Thing is Spurs are a well run ship (financially), and United are not. Meaning you don't have the money to fund the stadium build and naming rights won't cover the cost, so you'll have to borrow to build. Adding to the debt that needs to be serviced which won't be cleared by the uplift in revenue for a good few years
If only Spurs won trophies, it'd be the perfect club...
Levvy also does very well financially out of that club and will never sell it, another parasite like the Glazers.

I quite like the artist impressions of the new stadium, if you build it they will come etc etc. 5yrs being mentioned for planning/build etc.
You could say that Everton have been run as a basket case for the last 8 years but thankfully that period is over with Mosheri moving on. He did provide us with the means to develop Bramley Moore on the banks of the Mersey. However this has taken the best part of 30 years to realise. Several locations, designs and funding solutions. Up until our new owners arrived the stadium was basically funded by Kalana type loans banghead one point the council was going to borrow the money on our behalf but that option didn't happen although kopites like to think their council tax paid for it. I wish it did!

I'd be amazed if you guys get a spade in the ground in 5 years let alone complete it. Oh and you can double that 2bn. BMD was supposed to cost 350m but has cost 760!

Edit. Bowl like Arsenal? Lol.

fourstardan

5,397 posts

156 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
It's quite nice to have these grand ambitious plans but....

Jim Reaper wants to use the canal to bring in modular construction....the guys an industrialist he is living in 1850

fourstardan

5,397 posts

156 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all
fourstardan said:
It's quite nice to have these grand ambitious plans but....

Jim Reaper wants to use the canal to bring in modular construction....is this guy an industrialist capitalist with a top hat from 1850

Wacky Racer

39,560 posts

259 months

Tuesday 11th March
quotequote all

Frimley111R

16,598 posts

246 months

Wednesday 12th March
quotequote all
Daz68 said:
and31 said:
I like it a lot, but I’ll be amazed if it’s done in five years
It will become the new HS2 fiasco. Be well over budget and non viable.
5 years. Lol, not a chance, even though we need it even sooner. And aren't all big construction projects massively over budget?

redstar1

94 posts

3 months

Wednesday 12th March
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
5 years. Lol, not a chance, even though we need it even sooner. And aren't all big construction projects massively over budget?
I think that might be somewhat behind the plan to build it all 'somewhere else' and bring it up the canal. It could work well, even using somewhere close by that has spare capacity like the shipyard in Belfast. They might also mean somewhere with much lower labour costs...

I'm skeptical about the timescales but pleased with the ambition, assuming it's genuine.

Challo

11,343 posts

167 months

Wednesday 12th March
quotequote all
redstar1 said:
Frimley111R said:
5 years. Lol, not a chance, even though we need it even sooner. And aren't all big construction projects massively over budget?
I think that might be somewhat behind the plan to build it all 'somewhere else' and bring it up the canal. It could work well, even using somewhere close by that has spare capacity like the shipyard in Belfast. They might also mean somewhere with much lower labour costs...

I'm skeptical about the timescales but pleased with the ambition, assuming it's genuine.
I think the plan would be that it would take 5 years to build once the spade is in the ground, but doesn't mean it will be ready in 2030.

I was reading that INEOS are building something in a similar way in Europe. Construct large pieces elsewhere then ship to site.

They haven't confirmed all the funding is in place, and need approval from the Council and Government to confirm the funding on the bigger re-development.

fiatpower

3,331 posts

183 months

Wednesday 12th March
quotequote all
fourstardan said:
It's quite nice to have these grand ambitious plans but....

Jim Reaper wants to use the canal to bring in modular construction....the guys an industrialist he is living in 1850
That's probably the only part which is reasonable. Can't see the time or cost being correct but the modular construction actually is quite smart.

epom

13,087 posts

173 months

Wednesday 12th March
quotequote all
Crikey, listening to the interview at the moment. Sad state of affairs.

FlyingTrotter

358 posts

167 months

Thursday 13th March
quotequote all
The Athletic have a pretty Good pod on the financing of the club going forward

INEOS clearly have raised over $10 billion in debt and are very connected to serious players but the messages from that pod were

Profits from building housing and other types of new structures on the land owned by the club could release up to a billion and like Peel and the Manchester Ship Canal Company play in the 90’s land is a big part of this not just for the local authority

Long term bonds a part of the mix

The lack of any mention of the Glazers could be code for the fact that as a part of the implementation of the whole redevelopment plan they will exit as SJR is not (aside from one JV he has)a man who operates as a minority or joint shareholder and he tends to keep his businesses as private companies not publicly listed

He may not be a detail man in interviews and he certainly has a way of talking in a slightly loose way (about his core chemicals business as much as his sports and automotive business) that rubs some up the wrong way - but he gets things done

simon800

3,106 posts

119 months

Thursday 13th March
quotequote all
Massive game tonight.

I know some don't think we have a hope in hell of winning Europa, but I actually think Amorim's defensive and slow football he has us playing probably suits European football more than the PL.

We actually looked ok away against Sociedad last week on the whole, compared to our broader PL performances.

As always it's hard to see where a goal might come from, but Bruno seems to be bailing us out in the key moments at present and the slower pace of the game should suit Zirkzee too.

Not getting giddy and saying we are going to win the whole thing by any stretch, but it would be transformative if we did.

FlyingTrotter

358 posts

167 months

Thursday 13th March
quotequote all
Barca and Real games were very close - could be a real nerve jangler tonight

Frimley111R

16,598 posts

246 months

Thursday 13th March
quotequote all
epom said:
Crikey, listening to the interview at the moment. Sad state of affairs.
Yes but at least someone seems to be acknowledging it and doing something about it, unlike the last 10 years.