2021 Cost Cap Breaches
Discussion
deadslow said:
PhilAsia said:
deadslow said:
PhilAsia said:
deadslow said:
I was once found to have broken a rule. I parked my car, but the rear wheel was (literally) one inch on a zig zag. I was not aware of this and had no intention of mis-parking. The rozzers stopped and gave me a £60.00 reminder to be more careful. I do not consider myself to be a criminal, nor to have tried to gain any unfair/illegal advantage. I just broke a rule, inadvertently.
You clearly do not know the rule. No bodywork should overhanging the parking restriction. With knowledge you can make informed decisions........like RB could have with cost cap practice. Capisci??Without the knowledge I have now given you, you were just inadvertently ignorant, just as RBR were when they were offered the opportunity to be clever and use the cost cap practice.
Edited by PhilAsia on Thursday 24th November 18:09
I parked my car illegally. I did not intend to do so, and did not consider that I had done so. But turns out I had, so paid a fine. The End. It's not complicated.
"...I parked my car, but the rear wheel was (literally) one inch on a zig zag. I was not aware of this and had no intention of mis-parking...."
Comprehension is not your best subject, is it?
Jasandjules said:
deadslow said:
yes, and the assistant checked everything and assured me I was ok, but unfortunately the rules were constantly changing, so I got caught out.
I would recommend you use a similar assistant as used by every other team who managed not to get caught out.PhilAsia said:
deadslow said:
I was once found to have broken a rule. I parked my car, but the rear wheel was (literally) one inch on a zig zag. I was not aware of this and had no intention of mis-parking. The rozzers stopped and gave me a £60.00 reminder to be more careful. I do not consider myself to be a criminal, nor to have tried to gain any unfair/illegal advantage. I just broke a rule, inadvertently.
You clearly do not know the rule. No bodywork should overhanging the parking restriction. With knowledge you can make informed decisions........like RB could have with cost cap practice. Capisci??Without the knowledge I have now given you, you were just inadvertently ignorant, just as RBR were when they were offered the opportunity to be clever and use the cost cap practice.
NRS said:
RB clearly did it accidently. It's well known teams will skip practice sessions and pit stop practices in F1 for example, as practices give you no advantage.( ) It's perfectly understandable they'd skip the cost cap practice year too. Of course that was ABSOLUTELY NOT because it would allow them to plead innocence on grey areas, because no one had flagged those particular ones to the FIA in the practice year...!
Not getting through...wall too thick!!Edited by PhilAsia on Thursday 24th November 18:09
deadslow said:
MarkwG said:
deadslow said:
heebeegeetee said:
deadslow said:
well, you may recall the FIA, who, unlike ourselves, possess all the facts, stated unequivocally that RB had been open, transparent and honest, obviously validating RB's assertion. Them's just the facts, lads. Sorry about that.
We don't know they're the facts, we only know what we've been told. Neither parties are especially trust worthy in my opinion.Pleading ignorance is possibly the oldest defence in the book.
It is difficult to prove that RB deliberately cheated, but they've gamed the system imo and thus will be seen as cheats to a great many.
There was no cheating.
Clinton had to be dragged kicking and screaming.
The FIA/RB process has been open and honest. What part of it do you not understand? It seems like a very straightforward accounting disagreement, which is not at all uncommon.
Stirred up, of course, by Wolff and his FIA plant, into a frenzy. He should write for the Daily Mail.
heebeegeetee said:
deadslow said:
yes, and the assistant checked everything and assured me I was ok, but unfortunately the rules were constantly changing, so I got caught out.
The rules on parking on zig-zags have never changed.deadslow said:
simon_harris said:
deadslow said:
ok, chum, you win
And managed it without cheating, unlike Red Bull…I was prepared to just drop it, as I had proved my point that I know you were not aware of the law, as you mentioned your tyres on the line, not the overhanging bodywork.
Another thing I did not mention (to contain the conversation for the benefit of the thread) is that the law is there for the safety of pedestrians. Obscuring the sight lines leads me to suspect you are perhaps unable to consider pedestrian safety as well as not understanding the law you claimed to understand.
Drop the farce please..
PhilAsia said:
deadslow said:
simon_harris said:
deadslow said:
ok, chum, you win
And managed it without cheating, unlike Red Bull…I was prepared to just drop it, as I had proved my point that I know you were not aware of the law, as you mentioned your tyres on the line, not the overhanging bodywork.
Another thing I did not mention (to contain the conversation for the benefit of the thread) is that the law is there for the safety of pedestrians. Obscuring the sight lines leads me to suspect you are perhaps unable to consider pedestrian safety as well as not understanding the law you claimed to understand.
Drop the farce please..
deadslow said:
heebeegeetee said:
deadslow said:
yes, and the assistant checked everything and assured me I was ok, but unfortunately the rules were constantly changing, so I got caught out.
The rules on parking on zig-zags have never changed.Also you ignored the FIA saying there was no mole, so why do you accept their statement in one instance and not the other?
deadslow said:
they did act within the rules.
How can you make this ridiculous claim?If they had indeed acted within the rules, no penalties would have been applied and this thread would not exist.
Are you being:
1) wilfully obtuse,
2) a troll,
3) or, do you actually believe what you post?
MustangGT said:
deadslow said:
they did act within the rules.
How can you make this ridiculous claim?If they had indeed acted within the rules, no penalties would have been applied and this thread would not exist.
Are you being:
1) wilfully obtuse,
2) a troll,
3) or, do you actually believe what you post?
All the worries about the Ex-Merc employee being a mole, and it's the FIA president who has a strong RB link instead, He's even promised them more future wins too.
https://twitter.com/EdSpencer99/status/16013660900...
I wonder if the same people previously worried about the integrity and possible leaks to teams will be more worried about the FIA president being ex-RB and promising future wins? Particularly given recent championship decisions.
https://twitter.com/EdSpencer99/status/16013660900...
I wonder if the same people previously worried about the integrity and possible leaks to teams will be more worried about the FIA president being ex-RB and promising future wins? Particularly given recent championship decisions.
NRS said:
All the worries about the Ex-Merc employee being a mole, and it's the FIA president who has a strong RB link instead, He's even promised them more future wins too.
https://twitter.com/EdSpencer99/status/16013660900...
I wonder if the same people previously worried about the integrity and possible leaks to teams will be more worried about the FIA president being ex-RB and promising future wins? Particularly given recent championship decisions.
That all just looked super awkward and lots of points being (badly) scored on stagehttps://twitter.com/EdSpencer99/status/16013660900...
I wonder if the same people previously worried about the integrity and possible leaks to teams will be more worried about the FIA president being ex-RB and promising future wins? Particularly given recent championship decisions.
NRS said:
All the worries about the Ex-Merc employee being a mole, and it's the FIA president who has a strong RB link instead, He's even promised them more future wins too.
https://twitter.com/EdSpencer99/status/16013660900...
I wonder if the same people previously worried about the integrity and possible leaks to teams will be more worried about the FIA president being ex-RB and promising future wins? Particularly given recent championship decisions.
This is so awkward it's almost impossible to get through.https://twitter.com/EdSpencer99/status/16013660900...
I wonder if the same people previously worried about the integrity and possible leaks to teams will be more worried about the FIA president being ex-RB and promising future wins? Particularly given recent championship decisions.
BTW today is one year to the day that Hamilton was robbed in Abu Dhabi.
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff