Niels Wittich Leaves

Niels Wittich Leaves

Author
Discussion

TheDeuce

25,330 posts

74 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
NRS said:
Nova Gyna said:
entropy said:
vaud said:
When are the FIA elections? Is this a more simple clearout of anyone that has info/poses a threat to reputation?
Next year. According to Nick Daman on this week's Midweek Motorsport there are no challengers to MBS.
That’s disappointing.
Not really, sounds like good news. Got fed up of another team/driver dominating for ages so it’ll be good they mix it up again.
Ahh, that's a good point. Instead of the team/driver that does best winning a racing series designed to work out who's best, even if it happens to be the same combination several years in a row... it would be better if the sports governing body stepped in and selected a different winner to keep it fresh?

Like at school sports day, everyone gets a prize smile
rofl

I can’t tell if you two are taking the piss or genuinely believe that Benny has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster literally from day one - an impressive streak of dumbfkery he's somehow managed to maintain throughout his tenure.

But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is I guess hehe
I think you need to re-read! I'm obviously anti MBS but also don't want a winning team to be nobbled for the sake of the show - if that's what winning is, what are we actually watching!?

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
NRS said:
Nova Gyna said:
entropy said:
vaud said:
When are the FIA elections? Is this a more simple clearout of anyone that has info/poses a threat to reputation?
Next year. According to Nick Daman on this week's Midweek Motorsport there are no challengers to MBS.
That’s disappointing.
Not really, sounds like good news. Got fed up of another team/driver dominating for ages so it’ll be good they mix it up again.
Ahh, that's a good point. Instead of the team/driver that does best winning a racing series designed to work out who's best, even if it happens to be the same combination several years in a row... it would be better if the sports governing body stepped in and selected a different winner to keep it fresh?

Like at school sports day, everyone gets a prize smile
rofl

I can’t tell if you two are taking the piss or genuinely believe that Benny has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster literally from day one - an impressive streak of dumbfkery he's somehow managed to maintain throughout his tenure.

But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is I guess hehe
I think you need to re-read! I'm obviously anti MBS but also don't want a winning team to be nobbled for the sake of the show - if that's what winning is, what are we actually watching!?
Make up your mind. You were questioning my ‘disappointing’ comment earlie, yet now you say you’re ‘obviously anti MBS.’ So, you don’t find it disappointing that he’s standing unopposed for reelection?

TheDeuce

25,330 posts

74 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
NRS said:
Nova Gyna said:
entropy said:
vaud said:
When are the FIA elections? Is this a more simple clearout of anyone that has info/poses a threat to reputation?
Next year. According to Nick Daman on this week's Midweek Motorsport there are no challengers to MBS.
That’s disappointing.
Not really, sounds like good news. Got fed up of another team/driver dominating for ages so it’ll be good they mix it up again.
Ahh, that's a good point. Instead of the team/driver that does best winning a racing series designed to work out who's best, even if it happens to be the same combination several years in a row... it would be better if the sports governing body stepped in and selected a different winner to keep it fresh?

Like at school sports day, everyone gets a prize smile
rofl

I can’t tell if you two are taking the piss or genuinely believe that Benny has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster literally from day one - an impressive streak of dumbfkery he's somehow managed to maintain throughout his tenure.

But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is I guess hehe
I think you need to re-read! I'm obviously anti MBS but also don't want a winning team to be nobbled for the sake of the show - if that's what winning is, what are we actually watching!?
Make up your mind. You were questioning my ‘disappointing’ comment earlie, yet now you say you’re ‘obviously anti MBS.’ So, you don’t find it disappointing that he’s standing unopposed for reelection?
As I said initially, disappointed suggests an expectation of another eventuality.

I'm not disappointed that his position represents (imo) corruption in the sport today, or corruption 'tomorrow' when he's re-elected. I've been expecting it since he was appointed.

I am disgusted. I'm not disappointed though, because I never had any other expectation. Did you..?

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
NRS said:
Nova Gyna said:
entropy said:
vaud said:
When are the FIA elections? Is this a more simple clearout of anyone that has info/poses a threat to reputation?
Next year. According to Nick Daman on this week's Midweek Motorsport there are no challengers to MBS.
That’s disappointing.
Not really, sounds like good news. Got fed up of another team/driver dominating for ages so it’ll be good they mix it up again.
Ahh, that's a good point. Instead of the team/driver that does best winning a racing series designed to work out who's best, even if it happens to be the same combination several years in a row... it would be better if the sports governing body stepped in and selected a different winner to keep it fresh?

Like at school sports day, everyone gets a prize smile
rofl

I can’t tell if you two are taking the piss or genuinely believe that Benny has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster literally from day one - an impressive streak of dumbfkery he's somehow managed to maintain throughout his tenure.

But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is I guess hehe
I think you need to re-read! I'm obviously anti MBS but also don't want a winning team to be nobbled for the sake of the show - if that's what winning is, what are we actually watching!?
Make up your mind. You were questioning my ‘disappointing’ comment earlie, yet now you say you’re ‘obviously anti MBS.’ So, you don’t find it disappointing that he’s standing unopposed for reelection?
As I said initially, disappointed suggests an expectation of another eventuality.

I'm not disappointed that his position represents (imo) corruption in the sport today, or corruption 'tomorrow' when he's re-elected. I've been expecting it since he was appointed.

I am disgusted. I'm not disappointed though, because I never had any other expectation. Did you..?
Perhaps more hope than expectation.

TheDeuce

25,330 posts

74 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
NRS said:
Nova Gyna said:
entropy said:
vaud said:
When are the FIA elections? Is this a more simple clearout of anyone that has info/poses a threat to reputation?
Next year. According to Nick Daman on this week's Midweek Motorsport there are no challengers to MBS.
That’s disappointing.
Not really, sounds like good news. Got fed up of another team/driver dominating for ages so it’ll be good they mix it up again.
Ahh, that's a good point. Instead of the team/driver that does best winning a racing series designed to work out who's best, even if it happens to be the same combination several years in a row... it would be better if the sports governing body stepped in and selected a different winner to keep it fresh?

Like at school sports day, everyone gets a prize smile
rofl

I can’t tell if you two are taking the piss or genuinely believe that Benny has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster literally from day one - an impressive streak of dumbfkery he's somehow managed to maintain throughout his tenure.

But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is I guess hehe
I think you need to re-read! I'm obviously anti MBS but also don't want a winning team to be nobbled for the sake of the show - if that's what winning is, what are we actually watching!?
Make up your mind. You were questioning my ‘disappointing’ comment earlie, yet now you say you’re ‘obviously anti MBS.’ So, you don’t find it disappointing that he’s standing unopposed for reelection?
As I said initially, disappointed suggests an expectation of another eventuality.

I'm not disappointed that his position represents (imo) corruption in the sport today, or corruption 'tomorrow' when he's re-elected. I've been expecting it since he was appointed.

I am disgusted. I'm not disappointed though, because I never had any other expectation. Did you..?
Perhaps more hope than expectation.
hope is good, of course.

What part of his appointment or behaviour since has lead to you developing hope?

I see that the sport loses well over $1bn in revenue if the Gulf Cooperation Council is not kept happy. I can't imagine how or why the sport, in a commercial sense, would value fair play higher than than value of $$$. The sport has proven repeatedly that it can deal with unfair play via management of the press and PR, and influence over the future prospects of everyone invested in the sport. There is also further value for F1 as the ME countries that buy in to the sport deliver the circuits the sport prescribes, they essentially do what is best for the F1 spectacle. They add value to the calendar - for the average viewer at least.

Perhaps you can convince me of a reason to be hopeful. Failing that, I'll stick with disgust wink

BrettMRC

4,520 posts

168 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Stop quoting all it's annoying. tongue out

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
NRS said:
Nova Gyna said:
entropy said:
vaud said:
When are the FIA elections? Is this a more simple clearout of anyone that has info/poses a threat to reputation?
Next year. According to Nick Daman on this week's Midweek Motorsport there are no challengers to MBS.
That’s disappointing.
Not really, sounds like good news. Got fed up of another team/driver dominating for ages so it’ll be good they mix it up again.
Ahh, that's a good point. Instead of the team/driver that does best winning a racing series designed to work out who's best, even if it happens to be the same combination several years in a row... it would be better if the sports governing body stepped in and selected a different winner to keep it fresh?

Like at school sports day, everyone gets a prize smile
rofl

I can’t tell if you two are taking the piss or genuinely believe that Benny has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster literally from day one - an impressive streak of dumbfkery he's somehow managed to maintain throughout his tenure.

But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is I guess hehe
I think you need to re-read! I'm obviously anti MBS but also don't want a winning team to be nobbled for the sake of the show - if that's what winning is, what are we actually watching!?
Make up your mind. You were questioning my ‘disappointing’ comment earlie, yet now you say you’re ‘obviously anti MBS.’ So, you don’t find it disappointing that he’s standing unopposed for reelection?
As I said initially, disappointed suggests an expectation of another eventuality.

I'm not disappointed that his position represents (imo) corruption in the sport today, or corruption 'tomorrow' when he's re-elected. I've been expecting it since he was appointed.

I am disgusted. I'm not disappointed though, because I never had any other expectation. Did you..?
Perhaps more hope than expectation.
hope is good, of course.

What part of his appointment or behaviour since has lead to you developing hope?

I see that the sport loses well over $1bn in revenue if the Gulf Cooperation Council is not kept happy. I can't imagine how or why the sport, in a commercial sense, would value fair play higher than than value of $$$. The sport has proven repeatedly that it can deal with unfair play via management of the press and PR, and influence over the future prospects of everyone invested in the sport. There is also further value for F1 as the ME countries that buy in to the sport deliver the circuits the sport prescribes, they essentially do what is best for the F1 spectacle. They add value to the calendar - for the average viewer at least.

Perhaps you can convince me of a reason to be hopeful. Failing that, I'll stick with disgust wink
Disgust and disappointment aren’t mutually exclusive in my experience, and we’re probably on the same page wrt the sport’s priorities. As for hope, I wasn’t suggesting MBS gives cause for it - quite the opposite. What’s disappointing is the lack of alternatives, which only perpetuates what you’ve described.

If you truly find his leadership ‘disgusting,’ surely an uncontested reelection is equally concerning?

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
Stop quoting all it's annoying. tongue out
Sorry, that’s my quota for the night. hehe

(Nod to PhilAsia)

TheDeuce

25,330 posts

74 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
Disgust and disappointment aren’t mutually exclusive in my experience, and we’re probably on the same page wrt the sport’s priorities. As for hope, I wasn’t suggesting MBS gives cause for it - quite the opposite. What’s disappointing is the lack of alternatives, which only perpetuates what you’ve described.

If you truly find his leadership ‘disgusting,’ surely an uncontested reelection is equally concerning?
Yes, but also predictable.

He's going to remain, or at least someone else he nominates will remain, for so long as the money does.

Tbf it was also essentially a dictatorship when BCE was pulling strings in F1 & the FIA. In fact, I'm pretty sure he's on record saying it was a dictatorship and that he's the dictator.

Bernie seemed to have a more discreet touch and a little more class though.

shirt

23,564 posts

209 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
hope is good, of course.

What part of his appointment or behaviour since has lead to you developing hope?

I see that the sport loses well over $1bn in revenue if the Gulf Cooperation Council is not kept happy. I can't imagine how or why the sport, in a commercial sense, would value fair play higher than than value of $$$. The sport has proven repeatedly that it can deal with unfair play via management of the press and PR, and influence over the future prospects of everyone invested in the sport. There is also further value for F1 as the ME countries that buy in to the sport deliver the circuits the sport prescribes, they essentially do what is best for the F1 spectacle. They add value to the calendar - for the average viewer at least.

Perhaps you can convince me of a reason to be hopeful. Failing that, I'll stick with disgust wink
Where’s the $1bn figure come from? 4 rounds at circa $50m each plus roughly same again from aramco’s series sponsorship.

The middle C in the GCC is rather amusing if you live in the region. The only reason the others followed UAE into the series is oneupmanship. Same as why Qatar were acting like a dog with 2 dicks when they got the World Cup.

I’ve met MBS a few times and nearly bought a car from his son. He was better as vice president as he was also head of the local MSA and did a huge amount for regional Motorsport. The presidency seems to come with a sole focus on f1 and nothing else.

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Yes, but also predictable.

He's going to remain, or at least someone else he nominates will remain, for so long as the money does.

Tbf it was also essentially a dictatorship when BCE was pulling strings in F1 & the FIA. In fact, I'm pretty sure he's on record saying it was a dictatorship and that he's the dictator.

Bernie seemed to have a more discreet touch and a little more class though.
Predictable, yes - but still disappointing.

And if we’re doomed to dictators, let’s hope his successor is at least a competent one.

TheDeuce

25,330 posts

74 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
TheDeuce said:
Yes, but also predictable.

He's going to remain, or at least someone else he nominates will remain, for so long as the money does.

Tbf it was also essentially a dictatorship when BCE was pulling strings in F1 & the FIA. In fact, I'm pretty sure he's on record saying it was a dictatorship and that he's the dictator.

Bernie seemed to have a more discreet touch and a little more class though.
Predictable, yes - but still disappointing.

And if we’re doomed to dictators, let’s hope his successor is at least a competent one.
His successor will be competent at being a dictator and ensuring the world looks the other way, I'm sure. MBS is himself hugely competent at his actual job (role), the fact he happens to head up the FIA is just a technicality.

We should probably stop bickering over the definition/use of the word 'disappointing', it's clear we're both in agreement that the situation appears to be a bit y. Can we agree on that word? smile



I suppose for balance I should again say this is all my view, based on what I perceive as a fan of the sport. It just seems to me that lots of things make a great deal more sense if we assume money is more of a factor than sporting fair play or logic.

Edited by TheDeuce on Friday 15th November 23:05

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 15th November
quotequote all
Agreed, 'stty' works just fine. smile

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Thursday 21st November
quotequote all
Flicking through the drivers' presser, George mentioned there was no discussion between them and the FIA about Wittich's sacking. That seems to put to bed the rumours that a bust-up with some drivers forced him out.

To give Occam’s razor its due, it’s probably just a case of the wiser rats abandoning MBS’ stinking ship.

Jasandjules

70,539 posts

237 months

Thursday 21st November
quotequote all
Leaves? Leaves? Gets booted....

honda_exige

6,653 posts

214 months

Thursday 21st November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
Flicking through the drivers' presser, George mentioned there was no discussion between them and the FIA about Wittich's sacking. That seems to put to bed the rumours that a bust-up with some drivers forced him out.

To give Occam’s razor its due, it’s probably just a case of the wiser rats abandoning MBS’ stinking ship.
He stated he was sacked, that we know. Why, we don't know.

TheDeuce

25,330 posts

74 months

Thursday 21st November
quotequote all
It was often said Charlie Whiting was irreplaceable - it turns out that was true. It's been a complete st show since we lost him and what was for 2 decades+ a respectful partnership between him and the drivers, now appears to be more akin to war. At very least respect and trust has been replaced with... confusion. None of the drivers seem to have any inkling as to why Niels has been booted - all they know is that something was obviously not right, and whatever it was, they are no longer close enough to understand. That's light years away from the positive relationship they had with the RD role in Whitings day.

Since his passing, no one else has survived more than 5 minutes without some sort of drama rolleyes

Nova Gyna

1,645 posts

34 months

Friday 22nd November
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Leaves? Leaves? Gets booted....
I think it was Oscar Wilde who said, to lose one race director may be regarded as a misfortune; but to lose three in as many years makes you look an incompetent tt. Or something along those lines. biggrin

Jasandjules

70,539 posts

237 months

Friday 22nd November
quotequote all
Nova Gyna said:
Jasandjules said:
Leaves? Leaves? Gets booted....
I think it was Oscar Wilde who said, to lose one race director may be regarded as a misfortune; but to lose three in as many years makes you look an incompetent tt. Or something along those lines. biggrin
It certainly is not a good look. And has been eruditely noted above, Mr Whiting did the job for 20 years FFS.

vaud

52,514 posts

163 months

Friday 22nd November
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
It certainly is not a good look. And has been eruditely noted above, Mr Whiting did the job for 20 years FFS.
Trues but he/they didn’t have a well tested succession plan. Masi was the successor but I don’t recall Charlie testing him by letting him be the leader for some weekends under his watch? I’m not having a go at Charlie, but it is an issue for many senior people.