RE: Driven: Ferrari FF

Author
Discussion

Adz The Rat

14,126 posts

210 months

Monday 12th November 2012
quotequote all
Absolutely incredible cars, I actually prefer them to the 458.

I wasn't sure on the looks until I saw one up close, then properly fell in love with it.

The sound is just amazing and the interior is the best of any car Ive ever been in.

Only driven it for a short distance but it felt just right, can't wait for a proper drive in one.




Ferrari FF - Nero With Crema - Explored by Adam Kennedy Photography, on Flickr

Stingercut

217 posts

168 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
Best sounding modern Ferrari and best interior too. Only had a sit in and good nose around at Silverstone but it looks much better in the flesh.

ajh38

876 posts

151 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
I think the ideal set up would be one of these for your winter car and a 458 Spyder for the summer blasts. I had never thought that my ideal two car garage would both be Ferrari's. Get the 458 in red with creme leather like all good Ferrari's should be then the FF in a more sedate colour like grey.

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
I've always been a bit mystified at the hostility towards the looks when the car it 'replaced', the Scag, was a hideous thing with squinty eyes, nasty wheels and a sense of being an anemic E Type with Ferrari badges on it...

The price of this is just silly tho - don't even try to justify it, just accept there are people with more money than they need (almost certainly more than they've earned or deserve)...

Camlet

1,132 posts

150 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
405dogvan said:
I've always been a bit mystified at the hostility towards the looks when the car it 'replaced', the Scag, was a hideous thing with squinty eyes, nasty wheels and a sense of being an anemic E Type with Ferrari badges on it...

The price of this is just silly tho - don't even try to justify it, just accept there are people with more money than they need (almost certainly more than they've earned or deserve)...
You were making sense. Until those eight words of drivel at the end.



kazino

1,580 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
Love these, hopefully will be able to pick one up once depreciation has brought it down to 612 levels

kmpowell

2,929 posts

229 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
365daytonafan said:
Your both wrong that Shooting Break
banghead


Trevor M

57 posts

146 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
If you think a Maybach has a steep depreciation curve, wait until you see these hideous slags drop once the warranty runs out! Two gear boxes? One a tiny one only made for this Ferrari? And all those Ferrari electrics to go wrong? And add that to all the reasons the mentioned second hand models are now so cheap times two or three because the FF is so butt ugly. It's the biggest financial black hole created this side of a Bugatti Veyron.

Doesn't matter to the devil-may-care banksters, footballers, and Duhbai crowd who buy them new and trade them in on whatever's next up from Ferrari just as the warranty runs dry.

British Beef

2,220 posts

166 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
Manual Ferrari 612 - Best of all worlds and you save £200k over an FF. If I was in the market for this sort of thing, this would be my choice!!!!

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...

DonkeyApple

55,407 posts

170 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
banghead
Technically, he is correct.

Originally it was Shooting Break as the term game from France where the break de chassis was literally the refreshments wagon that went out on the shoot.

In England, over time, the spelling was changed to be inline with our word for a cheap, open wagon or 'brake'.

So there are two arguements but it is very likely that as a concept it was a French import just as many other similar cultural tip table terms were at the time before the expansion of the Empire and Victoriana made us the social top dogs when it came to culture and land owning classes.

Dave Hedgehog

14,569 posts

205 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
270k for a car with a stupid Cheshire cat grinning face ...

think i'll pass

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
Camlet said:
405dogvan said:
I've always been a bit mystified at the hostility towards the looks when the car it 'replaced', the Scag, was a hideous thing with squinty eyes, nasty wheels and a sense of being an anemic E Type with Ferrari badges on it...

The price of this is just silly tho - don't even try to justify it, just accept there are people with more money than they need (almost certainly more than they've earned or deserve)...
You were making sense. Until those eight words of drivel at the end.
My point is that people repeatedly talk about getting the car they've always 'dreamed of' and how Ferraris are "aspirational", but they're not - they're just glitzy toys for people with more money than they could ever spend and they're creeping from 'expensive' to 'obscene'.

People talk of getting a car they're 'worked for' - but a £272K Ferrari isn't something you can 'work' for, there's no honest 'work' that pays that sort of money - gambling, extortion, inherited undeserved priviledge, tax avoidance and outright fraud are the sources of such wealth - the car is a sign of dishonesty.

I suppose we could call it 'trickle down economics' - someone born into wealth gets an FF now and in 8 years someone picks-it-up in the shed thread - except I've a suspicion that won't happen because car tech is creeping to the point that no-one can afford to run cars beyond a certain point - cars will either hold value as rare classics or rot somewhere until the remainder do the former!

I've been a fan of cars for a long time., but it's only recently that I've looked at some cars and thought "I'd rather that didn't exist". I see them like I see £10K designer handbags, I understand why people make them, I just wish society would shun them because £200K+ supercars being ascendant alongside foreclosures, unemployment and even rising hunger is - well - hard to swallow innit?

Tim16V

419 posts

183 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
What, pray tell, was your average mpg over the duration of the test - would really like to know?

mark morris

78 posts

229 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
A guy living near me has a black one, not the best looking but sounded great when he was giving it some towards me, preffered his old 458 tho
Mark

DonkeyApple

55,407 posts

170 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
405dogvan said:
People talk of getting a car they're 'worked for' - but a £272K Ferrari isn't something you can 'work' for, there's no honest 'work' that pays that sort of money - gambling, extortion, inherited undeserved priviledge, tax avoidance and outright fraud are the sources of such wealth - the car is a sign of dishonesty.
Or it's a sign of someone who refused to settle for the same job as all the regular folk around him and bust his balls to be better than he was born.

Just because you can only imagine such wealth being acquired dishonestly does not mean it is true or accurate.

There are plenty of people out there who stood up and stepped forward and put in immense hours to create the wealth needed to buy such a car. And the simple reality is that without these people most on PH wouldn't have a job and wouldn't have a car.

So, if be grateful that there are people out there with the money to buy these things. smile

Camlet

1,132 posts

150 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
405dogvan said:
Camlet said:
405dogvan said:
I've always been a bit mystified at the hostility towards the looks when the car it 'replaced', the Scag, was a hideous thing with squinty eyes, nasty wheels and a sense of being an anemic E Type with Ferrari badges on it...

The price of this is just silly tho - don't even try to justify it, just accept there are people with more money than they need (almost certainly more than they've earned or deserve)...
You were making sense. Until those eight words of drivel at the end.
My point is that people repeatedly talk about getting the car they've always 'dreamed of' and how Ferraris are "aspirational", but they're not - they're just glitzy toys for people with more money than they could ever spend and they're creeping from 'expensive' to 'obscene'.

People talk of getting a car they're 'worked for' - but a £272K Ferrari isn't something you can 'work' for, there's no honest 'work' that pays that sort of money - gambling, extortion, inherited undeserved priviledge, tax avoidance and outright fraud are the sources of such wealth - the car is a sign of dishonesty.

I suppose we could call it 'trickle down economics' - someone born into wealth gets an FF now and in 8 years someone picks-it-up in the shed thread - except I've a suspicion that won't happen because car tech is creeping to the point that no-one can afford to run cars beyond a certain point - cars will either hold value as rare classics or rot somewhere until the remainder do the former!

I've been a fan of cars for a long time., but it's only recently that I've looked at some cars and thought "I'd rather that didn't exist". I see them like I see £10K designer handbags, I understand why people make them, I just wish society would shun them because £200K+ supercars being ascendant alongside foreclosures, unemployment and even rising hunger is - well - hard to swallow innit?
Look, you're completely at liberty to discuss and criticise whatever you want. And I grant you there are a few people who fit your bitter description. But there are thankfully a relatively huge number of people who started a business with nothing and through a clever idea, a incredible passion, considerable bottle and years of hard work managed to either sell their business for a handsome profit or are now delivering handsome dividends from sustainable profits. That's how these people are able to buy these types of cars. The car is a sign of dishonesty? You are joking? But if you do feel so strongly about successful people creating honest wealth and enjoying it, if you really do detest their success, if you feel we would be better off without wealth creators who are still prepared to pay big chunks of tax to the Inland Revenue, go live in Greece now. See how good it feels. No? I thought not.

kmpowell

2,929 posts

229 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Technically, he is correct.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v30q6VkphbE

DonkeyApple

55,407 posts

170 months

Tuesday 13th November 2012
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
Got it. I completely missed you're point. biggrin

Banjo47

178 posts

227 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Camlet said:
405dogvan said:
Camlet said:
405dogvan said:
I've always been a bit mystified at the hostility towards the looks when the car it 'replaced', the Scag, was a hideous thing with squinty eyes, nasty wheels and a sense of being an anemic E Type with Ferrari badges on it...

The price of this is just silly tho - don't even try to justify it, just accept there are people with more money than they need (almost certainly more than they've earned or deserve)...
You were making sense. Until those eight words of drivel at the end.
My point is that people repeatedly talk about getting the car they've always 'dreamed of' and how Ferraris are "aspirational", but they're not - they're just glitzy toys for people with more money than they could ever spend and they're creeping from 'expensive' to 'obscene'.

People talk of getting a car they're 'worked for' - but a £272K Ferrari isn't something you can 'work' for, there's no honest 'work' that pays that sort of money - gambling, extortion, inherited undeserved priviledge, tax avoidance and outright fraud are the sources of such wealth - the car is a sign of dishonesty.

I suppose we could call it 'trickle down economics' - someone born into wealth gets an FF now and in 8 years someone picks-it-up in the shed thread - except I've a suspicion that won't happen because car tech is creeping to the point that no-one can afford to run cars beyond a certain point - cars will either hold value as rare classics or rot somewhere until the remainder do the former!

I've been a fan of cars for a long time., but it's only recently that I've looked at some cars and thought "I'd rather that didn't exist". I see them like I see £10K designer handbags, I understand why people make them, I just wish society would shun them because £200K+ supercars being ascendant alongside foreclosures, unemployment and even rising hunger is - well - hard to swallow innit?
Look, you're completely at liberty to discuss and criticise whatever you want. And I grant you there are a few people who fit your bitter description. But there are thankfully a relatively huge number of people who started a business with nothing and through a clever idea, a incredible passion, considerable bottle and years of hard work managed to either sell their business for a handsome profit or are now delivering handsome dividends from sustainable profits. That's how these people are able to buy these types of cars. The car is a sign of dishonesty? You are joking? But if you do feel so strongly about successful people creating honest wealth and enjoying it, if you really do detest their success, if you feel we would be better off without wealth creators who are still prepared to pay big chunks of tax to the Inland Revenue, go live in Greece now. See how good it feels. No? I thought not.
+1
clap

kmpowell

2,929 posts

229 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Look what was parked outside of work tonight. Excuse the crap phone pics, I was in a rush to get home...




On a couple of occasions I've seen a grey one prowling the square, but this is the first time I've seen one static and up close. Pictures do NOT do this car justice, it is stunning in the metal. Ok, so the White with bright red interior (inc seats, dash, console, carpets, the lot!) probably wouldn't be my choice, but the lines and shapes remind me of the Z3M coupe, but with exotic aggression.

Would I buy one if I had the money? Well, due to where I work I get to see all sorts of wild and expensive exotica on a daily basis (parked 3 spaces up from the FF was a bright orange Lamborghini Aventador!), and [even though it was white] this is the first time I've not thought the shape of an exotic car was vulgar or looked out of place, so yes I probably would.

Edited by kmpowell on Wednesday 14th November 18:49