RE: Zenos Project E10 - exclusive

RE: Zenos Project E10 - exclusive

Author
Discussion

TinyCappo

2,106 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
engine in the rear may mean suitable legroom for those not sub 6ft2.

sunsurfer

305 posts

189 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Hellbound said:
Just give it a dash and interior made from recycled wood pulp and hemp and sell them at Ikea for £5k.

bigmouth

Edited by Hellbound on Thursday 5th September 13:47
I'd probably buy it. But I think you mean bamboo wink

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

267 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
sunsurfer said:
nckr55 said:
This. I often wonder what a modern mid/rear engined light, compact 2+2 would be like. It would for one thing have a genuine niche to differentiate from the ultra-impractical track days only crowd.

Think Posrsche 901, reimagined. Then your market sector is people currently buying second hand 911s (and maybe Evoras) or new hot hatches as a daily / track day car. Under £30k and as usable as a TT (in terms of size, space, pace) - but lighter & simpler.
Nice, I like that. Maybe there is a market for something semi-unique and special that has all the usability of a TT.
That car already exists - it's called the Lotus Evora. They aren't exactly flying off the shelves... frown

P4ROT

1,219 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Interesting concept/design- check
Exciting engine predictions- check
Employee talent from all around the globe- check
The 'No, but we assure you that this small volume start-up is different' journalistic piece- check

Seems like this one's a go wink

Miura Anjin

70 posts

169 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
loudlashadjuster said:
admit near first sales that the price will have to be >50% more than initially envisaged
Once Ansar gets banned from all four McDonalds in the Norwich area (for gratuitous use of the free straw dispensers) the retail price of each car will have to increase by almost 11p.

donteatpeople

837 posts

282 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Tartan Pixie said:
Would be really interesting to hear more about what they are actually doing with those cut up drinking straws to turn them in to a car, because that shot of the cutaway piece looks like something you'd insulate a house with, not build a car from.
It looks a lot like the sort of thing truck bodies are made from, plastic honeycomb core with a composite skin.

Woody

2,189 posts

292 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Looks interesting - would like to see the body design.

Agent Orange

2,194 posts

254 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Well I've seen some poor teaser shots over the years but this one takes the biscuit.

biggrin



Certainly sounds promising on paper. Good luck to them. More choice is never a bad thing.

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

238 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Concept sketch from the Autocar article on the E10:



Followed by the E11 and E12 later on:



qwick

530 posts

275 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
"Do you want flies with that?"

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

254 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
I hope they've taken a moment to look at the excellent sportscars already on sale. I just can't get excited about yet another of these pipedreams.

The Wookie

14,046 posts

236 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Looks suspiciously like a Hethel Engineering centre unit...

So Caterham is staffed by ex-Lotus people, Zenos is staffed by ex-Caterham people, if the chain goes on will there eventually be one bloke who has worked at all of them in a garden shed in Norfolk making his own ultra-ultra low volume sports car with an aluminium chassis??

nedge2k

132 posts

169 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Think they should be leading with the E11/E12 to be fair. More market appeal than what will be perceived as an open top track toy.

Corpulent Tosser

5,468 posts

253 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
TinyCappo said:
engine in the rear may mean suitable legroom for those not sub 6ft2.
6' 2" ?

Looking at the distance from seat to pedals in that wooden buck you would have to be that at least to drive it.

canucklehead

416 posts

154 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
have to wonder how many of these they could actually sell, and how much profit they will be able to realise on each one, at a price that people will buy them for.

lots of competition in this sector + relatively small volumes = poor business plan, methinks.

would love to be proved wrong however. good luck to them!

stevenkelby

5 posts

171 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
This may be a bit OT but here's what I want to see.

A 3 seater.

Why, in the last hundred years, has there only been a single car made with 3 seats? And the F1 is considered by many to be the greatest car ever made.

A central driving position, and the ability to have 2 passengers, would be a quite a unique selling point.

How hard can it be? Whack the driver in the middle, 2 seats behind and to the side. Why has no one tried it in a cheaper car?

The F1 with it's V12 is shorter and narrower than an Evora too.

Anyway, something to think about.

NDT

Original Poster:

1,766 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Needs to be very sub £30k in my book more like £20k.

.
I can't see that business case working.

mikeg15

287 posts

208 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Tartan Pixie said:
I don't think this is a case of simply using different cloth with the standard process for carbon fibre, it looks like a different process altogether that happens to have carbon in it.

Would be really interesting to hear more about what they are actually doing with those cut up drinking straws to turn them in to a car, because that shot of the cutaway piece looks like something you'd insulate a house with, not build a car from.
It's similar in concept to Mallite or this stuff
http://www.rigidized.com/laminated.php

Edited by mikeg15 on Thursday 5th September 18:13

NDT

Original Poster:

1,766 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
I'd guess the recycled carbon sheet bodywork is not there for structural rigidity (given the tub).
Probably slightly stiffer than GRP for less weight, particularly with the straw-filled section.

TinyCappo

2,106 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Corpulent Tosser said:
TinyCappo said:
engine in the rear may mean suitable legroom for those not sub 6ft2.
6' 2" ?

Looking at the distance from seat to pedals in that wooden buck you would have to be that at least to drive it.
Being 6' 5" that is not a bad thing!