RE: 2023 BMW XM | PH Review
Discussion
Om said:
JimbobVFR said:
And I'm struggling to imagine a garage big enough, not many are I'd have thought
The kind of people who buy this don’t want it hidden away in a garage. They want it on show at the front of their semi-detached new build with its arse hanging out over the pavement.bangerhoarder said:
Would rather have a Citroen XM, by a margin. Using the change to try to clear all of the fault warnings on the dashboard.
Need to change the subtitle to M1 surely?
This. The Citroen is far more attractive and on the awful roads round here I'd expect a better drive too. Not only that but it doesn't have the stigma of a BMW SUV. (Some SUVs are fine, FF Range Rover, Land cruiser etc)Need to change the subtitle to M1 surely?
Also I can't help thinking it will be easier to keep the French car going in 15 to 20 years, despite it already being at least 25 years older.
Dark85 said:
The kind of people who buy this absolutely care what people think. They want everyone to know how rich and successful they are, hence all the "bling".
I'd buy this over the new range rover, if I had the money being the only caveat!! I adore Range Rovers but the new one looks like a soap carcing of the 405 that's been left in a hot bath. Lazy styling is even more inexcusable than provocative styling!! Edited by biggbn on Sunday 19th March 16:21
Raccaccoonie said:
Arsecati said:
Damn! You gotta have one hell of a micro-penis to have a need to own one of these things.
That would be for all big cars though. SUVs are getting bigger, I mean the Ferrari SUV is massive and no need for for it.biggbn said:
Raccaccoonie said:
Arsecati said:
Damn! You gotta have one hell of a micro-penis to have a need to own one of these things.
That would be for all big cars though. SUVs are getting bigger, I mean the Ferrari SUV is massive and no need for for it.I think it's a pretty vile car, but the comments on here are, frankly, ridiculous, and people seem to have a bee in their bonnet because someone else might like something they don't.
biggbn said:
What a dreadful cliche. Perhaps we should all own only what we need? Thus doing away with the classic car movement and any car enthusiast who owns anything that can be considered profligate by a judgemental third party? Who would be the arbitrer? The state perhaps? We could all be issued sate built cars only if we qualify, its what we need after all?
This car is aimed at China male market, the average penis size is 4.3 inches. I think that speaks for itself. There is a study that also found the link between small penis size and sportscar ownership
We found that males, and males over 30 in particular, rated sports cars as more desirable when they were made to feel that they had a small penis,"
https://futurism.com/neoscope/sports-cars-penis-si...
Arsecati said:
Damn! You gotta have one hell of a micro-penis to have a need to own one of these things.
It's fascinating that the assumption is that the only person interested in this has a penis at all. I would expect a sizeable portion of the target audience are female; most SUV owners I know are.
Raccaccoonie said:
There is a study that also found the link between small penis size and sportscar ownership. "We found that males, and males over 30 in particular, rated sports cars as more desirable when they were made to feel that they had a small penis," https://futurism.com/neoscope/sports-cars-penis-si...
That speaks volumes about some people on this list... 
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff