RE: 'Mk1' Batmobile Goes Up For Auction

RE: 'Mk1' Batmobile Goes Up For Auction

Author
Discussion

OwenK

3,472 posts

195 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Hasn't this been sitting in the classifieds for some time now?

Note to self, next time I sell car on PH, get them to write a feature on it for extra exposure...

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

JayP1

260 posts

173 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Only in America could you build a 7.5l engine that only produces 220bhp...

leon9191

752 posts

193 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
SimonSaid said:
GingerWizard said:
Though it retains the Lincoln's 7.5-litre V8 (don't get too excited though - it only manages 219bhp),

christ a child with a pencil cold do better! how and why ? please tell me it has 2500ft/lb torque....
360 lb ft @ 2800 RPM (full stats on this page)
"29BHP/litre" what is the point? I mean come on you would have to be stupid or american to entertain that.

Oh hang on........

time222222

55 posts

197 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Wasny george Barris the designer / creator of the original

deevlash

10,442 posts

237 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Ive seen this heap of crap. It was doing a promo stunt for "the noise next door" (a st, now defunct boyband) in Glasgow. It was going to drive to the front of the HMV in town and was parked round the back of the Tesco I was working in at the time for the boy band duo to get into and be driven round the corner. It took them ages to get it to start as the engine was totally fked, it sounded awful, belched smoke everywhere and was burning oil. The body work was awful too and was scrathced to buggery. Its been for sale for years too.

tossbag

1,590 posts

206 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
What the hell is this heap of st and why is the thread title RE: 'Mk1' Batmobile Goes Up For Auction ?



VS





VS





VS



And the original car was based on this:



That article is actually embarassing.

Edited by tossbag on Saturday 5th December 23:37

poindexter

87 posts

192 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
The donor car's got to have been miles better than this.

crofty1984

15,859 posts

204 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
tossbag said:
What the hell is this heap of st and why is the thread title RE: 'Mk1' Batmobile Goes Up For Auction ?



VS

Not that I'm going to be too mean, but it does look really upset in that pictre.

Wacky Racer

38,161 posts

247 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all

steveo3002

10,525 posts

174 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
looks like something homer simpson has made ...not even close is it

XitUp

7,690 posts

204 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
locodude said:
It's all wrong but what I can't get over is if you're going to all that trouble, why not do it right?
Cos the original one was based on a Futura that cost $250k when new?

leon9191 said:
SimonSaid said:
GingerWizard said:
Though it retains the Lincoln's 7.5-litre V8 (don't get too excited though - it only manages 219bhp),

christ a child with a pencil cold do better! how and why ? please tell me it has 2500ft/lb torque....
360 lb ft @ 2800 RPM (full stats on this page)
"29BHP/litre" what is the point? I mean come on you would have to be stupid or american to entertain that.

Oh hang on........
Why does hp/ltr matter?

P4ROT

1,219 posts

193 months

Monday 7th December 2009
quotequote all
XitUp said:
locodude said:
It's all wrong but what I can't get over is if you're going to all that trouble, why not do it right?
Cos the original one was based on a Futura that cost $250k when new?

leon9191 said:
SimonSaid said:
GingerWizard said:
Though it retains the Lincoln's 7.5-litre V8 (don't get too excited though - it only manages 219bhp),

christ a child with a pencil cold do better! how and why ? please tell me it has 2500ft/lb torque....
360 lb ft @ 2800 RPM (full stats on this page)
"29BHP/litre" what is the point? I mean come on you would have to be stupid or american to entertain that.

Oh hang on........
Why does hp/ltr matter?
What matters is that the majority of people could make that engine out of cardboard and get more power!

deevlash

10,442 posts

237 months

Monday 7th December 2009
quotequote all
P4ROT said:
XitUp said:
locodude said:
It's all wrong but what I can't get over is if you're going to all that trouble, why not do it right?
Cos the original one was based on a Futura that cost $250k when new?

leon9191 said:
SimonSaid said:
GingerWizard said:
Though it retains the Lincoln's 7.5-litre V8 (don't get too excited though - it only manages 219bhp),

christ a child with a pencil cold do better! how and why ? please tell me it has 2500ft/lb torque....
360 lb ft @ 2800 RPM (full stats on this page)
"29BHP/litre" what is the point? I mean come on you would have to be stupid or american to entertain that.

Oh hang on........
Why does hp/ltr matter?
What matters is that the majority of people could make that engine out of cardboard and get more power!
when I saw it, Id be amazed if the actual engine in that car makes even 100bhp, its shagged.

XitUp

7,690 posts

204 months

Monday 7th December 2009
quotequote all
P4ROT said:
XitUp said:
locodude said:
It's all wrong but what I can't get over is if you're going to all that trouble, why not do it right?
Cos the original one was based on a Futura that cost $250k when new?

leon9191 said:
SimonSaid said:
GingerWizard said:
Though it retains the Lincoln's 7.5-litre V8 (don't get too excited though - it only manages 219bhp),

christ a child with a pencil cold do better! how and why ? please tell me it has 2500ft/lb torque....
360 lb ft @ 2800 RPM (full stats on this page)
"29BHP/litre" what is the point? I mean come on you would have to be stupid or american to entertain that.

Oh hang on........
Why does hp/ltr matter?
What matters is that the majority of people could make that engine out of cardboard and get more power!
OK, you have until next monday. wink

AdrianGail

21 posts

184 months

Monday 7th December 2009
quotequote all
This has been for sale for months and months... TBH I thought it looked pretty accurate (until I saw the direct comparisson) but I suppose if you were anal enough to make a batmobile replica, you should really do it right.

Sicob

478 posts

228 months

Tuesday 8th December 2009
quotequote all
Pretty sure that Rear jet is actually a K&N air filter!

garethj

624 posts

197 months

Tuesday 8th December 2009
quotequote all
XitUp said:
locodude said:
It's all wrong but what I can't get over is if you're going to all that trouble, why not do it right?
Cos the original one was based on a Futura that cost $250k when new?
Doesn't matter - if you're going to build a replica, do it right. See links below

leon9191 said:
SimonSaid said:
GingerWizard said:
Why does hp/ltr matter?
Because The Riddler will take some catching? wink

This is the page to look at if you're making a Batmobile replica, not a freeze-frame from the 1970s Batman cartoon... clicky
A better quality replica of an old film car: here

Or this one.

|http://thumbsnap.com/v/ORwy0jBt.jpg

cazzer

8,883 posts

248 months

Tuesday 8th December 2009
quotequote all
When I did my Christine replica I spent hours and hours watchin the film, gettin every little bit right.
It's only when you do this that you realise you have to make compromises. Because most of the time, in a film, what we think of as "A" car is really "A few" cars. All with little differences.
So you have to compromise somewhere.

But then, with something like the Batmobile, if you can't get it as near as dammit then don't do it.


Edited by cazzer on Tuesday 8th December 12:18