718 Gt4 exhaust options

718 Gt4 exhaust options

Author
Discussion

kman

Original Poster:

1,108 posts

211 months

Saturday 11th January 2020
quotequote all
Considering a GT4 as my next purchase (I'm not allocated one will have to consider a flipped one), the one thing that kind of disappoints me is the noise - are there any aftermarket options that bring some noise back so to speak (like the 981 GT4)? Doing away with the GPF etc be an issue?

Twinfan

10,125 posts

104 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
JCR are doing a bunch of 718 GT4 and Spyder exhaust options.

TDT

4,933 posts

119 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
kman said:
Considering a GT4 as my next purchase (I'm not allocated one will have to consider a flipped one), the one thing that kind of disappoints me is the noise - are there any aftermarket options that bring some noise back so to speak (like the 981 GT4)? Doing away with the GPF etc be an issue?
GPF is not removed in any of the current available options. In fact it may be illegal to do so and will almost certainly cause CEL without a remap. JCR and GAD engineering options are back box replacement x-pipes.

Sound won’t be back to 981 GT4 levels, but will be louder than 718 stock.

Personally I’d get the car first and run it and then see if you still NEED it. It’s not really a HUGE deal for the closed top GT, sounds ok inside imo and will allow you to run unrestricted on track, especially for the costs… not sure that they even add performance which is primary driver for any mod’s I’d do anyway.


Edited by TDT on Sunday 12th January 10:02

arcamalpha

1,075 posts

164 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
The pictures I’ve seen don’t show any sensors after the GPF so it may not cause a CEL 🤞

TDT

4,933 posts

119 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
arcamalpha said:
The pictures I’ve seen don’t show any sensors after the GPF so it may not cause a CEL ??
After GPF is no problem, as per JCR and GAD

If you try to remove GPF you will likely have problem and at least CEL to clear.

Taffy66

5,964 posts

102 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
TDT said:
After GPF is no problem, as per JCR and GAD

If you try to remove GPF you will likely have problem and at least CEL to clear.
Can you post a link to GAD's new RS GPF Titanium exhaust if there is one.I'm looking at options for mine as a possible more cost effective alternative to JCR's version.

Twinfan

10,125 posts

104 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
TDT said:
not sure that they even add performance which is primary driver for any mod’s I’d do anyway.
JCR claimed around a 20bhp increase in their post on Rennlist from just the backbox swap...

TDT

4,933 posts

119 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
TDT said:
not sure that they even add performance which is primary driver for any mod’s I’d do anyway.
JCR claimed around a 20bhp increase in their post on Rennlist from just the backbox swap...
Yep I’ve seen that, that why I said I’m not sure vs saying they don’t add performance.
Definitely NOT poo-pooing but I’d want to see a dyno, as sound only isn’t worth it for ME for the cost.
Of course the new units are titanium (and this is where the cost comes from) so will save weight… that is a performance gain.
People can buy what they like.

TDT

4,933 posts

119 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Taffy66 said:
TDT said:
After GPF is no problem, as per JCR and GAD

If you try to remove GPF you will likely have problem and at least CEL to clear.
Can you post a link to GAD's new RS GPF Titanium exhaust if there is one.I'm looking at options for mine as a possible more cost effective alternative to JCR's version.
J, I don’t think GAD have a solution for 991.3(GPF) at present. Not evident from the website or instagram.

www.gadtuning.co.uk

The rapid detailer

278 posts

184 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Or buy a 981 and spend the £40k you’d save beer and women lol.

arcamalpha

1,075 posts

164 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
TDT said:
arcamalpha said:
The pictures I’ve seen don’t show any sensors after the GPF so it may not cause a CEL ??
After GPF is no problem, as per JCR and GAD

If you try to remove GPF you will likely have problem and at least CEL to clear.
What I meant is that (I think) there are no sensors after the GPF; just the normal oxygen sensor after the cat. So if the GPF is removed the car may not notice.

TeoGT4

1 posts

51 months

Tuesday 14th January 2020
quotequote all
Hello Everyone,

first post, I'm from Italy, 718 GT4 owner.

Did you noticed that the exhaust valves closing from 2.000 to around 4.000rpm ? Also if you have the button on.

Someone thought to try to keep it always open? Unplugging the connector as was done on old 997 GT3?

What do you think about?

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

265 months

Tuesday 14th January 2020
quotequote all
TeoGT4 said:
Hello Everyone,

first post, I'm from Italy, 718 GT4 owner.

Did you noticed that the exhaust valves closing from 2.000 to around 4.000rpm ? Also if you have the button on.

Someone thought to try to keep it always open? Unplugging the connector as was done on old 997 GT3?

What do you think about?
EU regs. you can buy after market bypass button to choose what the flaps do.


Jonny-JCR

10 posts

67 months

Wednesday 15th January 2020
quotequote all

Evo9lution

637 posts

140 months

Wednesday 18th March 2020
quotequote all
TeoGT4 said:
Hello Everyone,

first post, I'm from Italy, 718 GT4 owner.

Did you noticed that the exhaust valves closing from 2.000 to around 4.000rpm ? Also if you have the button on.

Someone thought to try to keep it always open? Unplugging the connector as was done on old 997 GT3?

What do you think about?
A company called Sportec (near Zurich) has a plug-and-play module where the valves can be overridden so that they are always open. This is done via a remote in the cabin.

A video of this working can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3POaTkQm9b4&t=...

Not sure if similar can be achieved by simply removing a fuse though ...

lagadmar

50 posts

180 months

Saturday 18th April 2020
quotequote all
Hi, I have a 718 Spyder with nothing else to do these days I have decided to do the exhaust mod.

I am also going to fit a flap control unit as the flaps close at 2k rpm and don’t open until around 4 even in sport mode.

Does anyone know why Porsche does this? I am guessing either noise or maybe engine/torque control?

I would be interested if anyone knows.

Kind regards

Marc

Twinfan

10,125 posts

104 months

Saturday 18th April 2020
quotequote all
EU noise regs IMHO.

arcamalpha

1,075 posts

164 months

Saturday 18th April 2020
quotequote all
Are the valves accessible? They used to use turbo blow off valves which could be held open with wire. Maybe that’s still possible without need to fiddle with electronics?

TDT

4,933 posts

119 months

Saturday 18th April 2020
quotequote all
Mad Scientist said:
Can’t you just disconnect the vacuum hoses or something to keep them open all the time?
Electronically controlled now - not vacuum.

gtsralph

1,186 posts

144 months

Saturday 18th April 2020
quotequote all
TDT said:
Electronically controlled now - not vacuum.
Sure? I thought they are vacuum - on start up low vacuum means flaps open initially until sufficient vacuum to close them. 992 electronic but 718 still vacuum.