How will the end of ICE availability affect buyer attitudes?

How will the end of ICE availability affect buyer attitudes?

Author
Discussion

Ankh87

952 posts

114 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Turtle Shed said:
SWoll said:
Ankh87 said:
My point is that when comparing, it's comparing apples and oranges. Yes they have things similar but the majority of people wouldn't notice if they were driving an EV or ICE (automatic). Only time they would is when they need to add fuel or electricity.
Don't agree without at all. Yet to speak to an EV driver who doesn't comment on how much smoother, quieter, more responsive and easy to drive they are than any ICE car they've had previously.
I don't agree either. My Leaf is a decade old now and in 40 years of owning all sorts of cars it is my an absolute mile the easiest to live with. Near silent, very comfortable, and absolute doddle to drive. The only negative is that the technology in it is fairly old*, and no doubt when I switch to an Ionic or Kona (or similar) in the coming months the more modern technology will only make things even more enjoyable.

  • SatNav is fairly crap, no DAB radio, no adaptive cruise, no Carplay or Android auto.
I mean people coming from newish auto ICE cars to EVs won't really notice. Most people auto ICE are fairly quiet if you aren't thrashing them. They are fairly smooth to drive and the modern cars 2021+ I've driven, you can't tell, other than 1 pedal driving. Yes the EV is quiet but once you have the radio on, they both sound the same. Again my partner drives 0-30 mph in like 15 seconds, she's in no rush so to her the car is smooth when changing gears.

JD

2,989 posts

240 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Ankh87 said:
I mean people coming from newish auto ICE cars to EVs won't really notice. Most people auto ICE are fairly quiet if you aren't thrashing them. They are fairly smooth to drive and the modern cars 2021+ I've driven, you can't tell,
You realise you are trying to convince a forum of people who actually drive electric cars something they know to be not factually correct right?


plfrench

3,325 posts

280 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
JD said:
Ankh87 said:
I mean people coming from newish auto ICE cars to EVs won't really notice. Most people auto ICE are fairly quiet if you aren't thrashing them. They are fairly smooth to drive and the modern cars 2021+ I've driven, you can't tell,
You realise you are trying to convince a forum of people who actually drive electric cars something they know to be not factually correct right?
Minor detail biggrin

I specifically ditched my 70 plate E350d because i preferred the drivetrain in even a lowly ID3 due to getting rid of the ICE and gearbox combo that was just so irritatingly un responsive / made a song and dance about things. I'd gotten so used to my wife's e-Golf and then Born just being more effective as a powertrain that I paid to early terminate the Mercedes. So in my sample of one, I'd fully disagree with not being able to tell the difference.



Ankh87

952 posts

114 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
JD said:
You realise you are trying to convince a forum of people who actually drive electric cars something they know to be not factually correct right?
I'm not convincing anyone about it on here. We all like cars. My partner on the other hand, has zero interest in cars. She's had the same car for going on 16 years now. She bought it new because it was cheap and got her from A to B. How many people on here can say they've only ever owned 1 car and was from new for more than 10 years?

So to her any new car with an automatic gearbox is all the same. They are all smooth and easy to drive.

BERNEV

64 posts

122 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Zigster said:
BERNEV said:
People say we don’t always need cars - witness the mention of fifteen minute cities above. All great if you live in one. I live in the Costa del Sol. I don’t use the car at all because I don’t need to day to day. But I do if we need to go anywhere out of the bounds of the immediate Malaga-Marbella strip. Same when I live in the rural West Country. There is no transport and my nearest supermarket is 7 miles away. City dwellers tend to forget that a large percentage of populations remain rural and the utopia of going back to how we were is a feasibility. It isn’t.
A large percentage? A quick google suggests that only about 15% of the population live rurally. The vast majority live in urban areas.
Statistics are always subject to interpretation. The government stats actually say 20% live in predominantly rural council districts. What we need to remember is that even in the “urban” areas there will be lots of rural landmass. To those living there (despite being an ostensible “urban “ borough) will feel rural and will have rural type infrastructure. Eg no buses etc.

PinkHouse

2,105 posts

69 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Why would you aspire to get a generic one? confused
They're all generic ones

SWoll

20,001 posts

270 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
PinkHouse said:
ZesPak said:
Why would you aspire to get a generic one? confused
They're all generic ones
How so?

QBee

21,602 posts

156 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
BERNEV said:
Zigster said:
BERNEV said:
People say we don’t always need cars - witness the mention of fifteen minute cities above. All great if you live in one. I live in the Costa del Sol. I don’t use the car at all because I don’t need to day to day. But I do if we need to go anywhere out of the bounds of the immediate Malaga-Marbella strip. Same when I live in the rural West Country. There is no transport and my nearest supermarket is 7 miles away. City dwellers tend to forget that a large percentage of populations remain rural and the utopia of going back to how we were is a feasibility. It isn’t.
A large percentage? A quick google suggests that only about 15% of the population live rurally. The vast majority live in urban areas.
Statistics are always subject to interpretation. The government stats actually say 20% live in predominantly rural council districts. What we need to remember is that even in the “urban” areas there will be lots of rural landmass. To those living there (despite being an ostensible “urban “ borough) will feel rural and will have rural type infrastructure. Eg no buses etc.
I have lived for 45 of the last 50 years in the countryside in the UK, but never more than 5 miles from a town for 43 of those years. I have needed a car to travel 20,000 business miles a year for most of that time. I currently live 3 miles from my local town, work from home, but with fields all around me. No bus service, no shops in my local village. My life is made far more convenient by having a car. When I am totally crocked I will have everything delivered, including dentists, opticians and doctors. whistle

In the mean time, here’s the view.


survivalist

5,982 posts

202 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
JD said:
Ankh87 said:
I mean people coming from newish auto ICE cars to EVs won't really notice. Most people auto ICE are fairly quiet if you aren't thrashing them. They are fairly smooth to drive and the modern cars 2021+ I've driven, you can't tell,
You realise you are trying to convince a forum of people who actually drive electric cars something they know to be not factually correct right?
Seems about right to me. Unsurprisingly this forum is full of people who are very enthusiastic about EVs. My sister in law got an EV as a company car.

Asked her how she liked it and she said that she liked carplay. Asked her what it was like to drive and she said much the same has her last car.

When it’s white goods motoring most people just don’t care. We’ve got both, can’t say I’m fussed either way. Real benefit of EV is that it warms up / defrosts a bit faster in winder.

People seem obsessed with picking a side, but ICE and EV are mostly the same - cars that get us from A to B.

Filling up with fuel really ain’t a big deal and neither is plugging it in to charge (assuming you can charge at home - otherwise I can see how travelling to charge would be annoying)

TheDeuce

Original Poster:

27,322 posts

78 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
survivalist said:
JD said:
Ankh87 said:
I mean people coming from newish auto ICE cars to EVs won't really notice. Most people auto ICE are fairly quiet if you aren't thrashing them. They are fairly smooth to drive and the modern cars 2021+ I've driven, you can't tell,
You realise you are trying to convince a forum of people who actually drive electric cars something they know to be not factually correct right?
Seems about right to me. Unsurprisingly this forum is full of people who are very enthusiastic about EVs. My sister in law got an EV as a company car.

Asked her how she liked it and she said that she liked carplay. Asked her what it was like to drive and she said much the same has her last car.

When it’s white goods motoring most people just don’t care. We’ve got both, can’t say I’m fussed either way. Real benefit of EV is that it warms up / defrosts a bit faster in winder.

People seem obsessed with picking a side, but ICE and EV are mostly the same - cars that get us from A to B.

Filling up with fuel really ain’t a big deal and neither is plugging it in to charge (assuming you can charge at home - otherwise I can see how travelling to charge would be annoying)
Exactly. It shouldn't be about picking sides and most cars are so dull as to not really matter what powers them. Overall, as an intelligent species if we can produce cleaner cars that still get the job done we should do, and we are doing - that's literally all that is happening. If the average "I don't really care" user doesn't notice a big difference, that's actually a good thing!

Obviously this is PH so a big part of the EV discussion is about the stupidly fast ones... which is fine, we're car people, we're supposed to like the more interesting cars that go beyond white goods. But for the average motorist the biggest draw is going to be stuff like the convenience of home charging and the smug factor of defrosting or cooling the car before you even get out of bed. The smooth and quiet running is also a plus but not a deal breaker.

We used to make cars one way, we will now make them another way. That's it!

bergclimber34

837 posts

5 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
The issue is the class and income divide let's be brutal here. Long term.

Until there is decent local charging network everywhere, those in flats, terraced, lower incomes, basically will not be driving EV's unless they can charge easily and effectively, the repair market is fair and decent and stuff like the secondhand market, insurance and costs are not crazy, that is the determining factor for people like that when buying cars.

It will even out eventually as maybe ICE will disappear and EV is the only option, but I also feel the class divide will start with personal transport, there is no easy solution to local, personal charging, so that will force a lot onto public transport and other forms of commuting, not a bad thing but a choice made for them, not by them.

That is the real deciding factor that will decide the future here.

TheDeuce

Original Poster:

27,322 posts

78 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
bergclimber34 said:
The issue is the class and income divide let's be brutal here. Long term.

Until there is decent local charging network everywhere, those in flats, terraced, lower incomes, basically will not be driving EV's unless they can charge easily and effectively, the repair market is fair and decent and stuff like the secondhand market, insurance and costs are not crazy, that is the determining factor for people like that when buying cars.

It will even out eventually as maybe ICE will disappear and EV is the only option, but I also feel the class divide will start with personal transport, there is no easy solution to local, personal charging, so that will force a lot onto public transport and other forms of commuting, not a bad thing but a choice made for them, not by them.

That is the real deciding factor that will decide the future here.
You mean people with less money can't afford the new things as quickly as those with more money? That sounds entirely normal and correct in a capitalist society.

There's absolutely no need for anyone to get an EV until the issues you mention are sorted, all they're missing out on therefore is the opportunity to buy a brand new car for a period of years - which is and always has been an expensive luxury.

bergclimber34

837 posts

5 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
The issue therefore is stop penalising those that cannot afford these things with increased emissions taxes and the like on cars they can afford, they cannot afford to run new cars in many cases ( especially with a family therefore needing a larger vehicle).

Effectively you are punishing people for not being able to afford a modern EV by heavily taxing them with all sorts of other costs, maybe not outweighed by the ludicrous cost of a new EV I admit, but even so, they get their pound of flesh either way, as usual. But you see the issue. Emissions based car tax is increasing hugely this month effectively penalising those that cannot afford EV's, that is a dirty way of treating people with less income. No surprise with this lefty shower in power.

TheDeuce

Original Poster:

27,322 posts

78 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
bergclimber34 said:
The issue therefore is stop penalising those that cannot afford these things with increased emissions taxes and the like on cars they can afford, they cannot afford to run new cars in many cases ( especially with a family therefore needing a larger vehicle).

Effectively you are punishing people for not being able to afford a modern EV by heavily taxing them with all sorts of other costs, maybe not outweighed by the ludicrous cost of a new EV I admit, but even so, they get their pound of flesh either way, as usual. But you see the issue. Emissions based car tax is increasing hugely this month effectively penalising those that cannot afford EV's, that is a dirty way of treating people with less income. No surprise with this lefty shower in power.
The emissions fines (ULEZ etc) are for all cars that produce emissions, so that's not a wealth level thing. Obviusly it is the case that motoring in general is getting more expensive... But that's why buses are provided.

I guess the real upset is from those that used to have no problem affording personal transport, but now find it a stretch they may not be able to maintain. That's not really the fault of EV introduction though. It's also the case the relative affordability of things does change, it always has. We can each afford only what we can afford and we shouldn't feel so entitled as to expect that to never change.


Len Clifton

88 posts

2 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
The emissions fines (ULEZ etc) are for all cars that produce emissions, so that's not a wealth level thing. Obviusly it is the case that motoring in general is getting more expensive... But that's why buses are provided.

I guess the real upset is from those that used to have no problem affording personal transport, but now find it a stretch they may not be able to maintain. That's not really the fault of EV introduction though. It's also the case the relative affordability of things does change, it always has. We can each afford only what we can afford and we shouldn't feel so entitled as to expect that to never change.
Difference is, all cars used to be taxed at the same rate. £60 for 6m or £120 per year if I remember correctly. Now, anything with a 2.0 petrol engine made after 2006 will cost its owner almost £800/year. Meanwhile, only reason EV drivers can afford to drive new cars is salary sacrifice, lower VED, and cheap energy tariffs. It’s discrimination against poor people for the benefit of people who work in offices and have off street parking. The answer cannot be that they catch the bus, especially when we need every working age person in work and able to get there.

Level the playing field for EVs vs ICEs and see how many people choose electric.


Edited by Len Clifton on Saturday 15th March 13:58

Deep Thought

37,333 posts

209 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
Len Clifton said:
Difference is, all cars used to be taxed at the same rate. £60 for 6m or £120 per year if I remember correctly. Now, anything with a 2.0 petrol engine made after 2006 will cost its owner almost £800/year. Meanwhile, only reason EV drivers can afford to drive new cars is salary sacrifice, lower VED, and cheap energy tariffs. It’s discrimination against poor people for the benefit of people who work in offices and have off street parking. The answer cannot be that they catch the bus, especially when we need every working age person in work and able to get there.

Level the playing field for EVs vs ICEs and see how many people choose electric.


Edited by Len Clifton on Saturday 15th March 13:58
Eh? Thats not right? confused

Also its generally cheaper to PCP a new EV than a new ICE car.

An ID.3 is cheaper in that way than the equivalent new Golf.

Also i dont thing theres any enforced requirement for 'poor' people to be buying a new car, EV or otherwise?

Deep Thought

37,333 posts

209 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
Len Clifton said:
Level the playing field for EVs vs ICEs and see how many people choose electric.
In what way is the playing field not level right now? A new EV is likely no more than a new ICE car, when bought via PCP or lease. And outside of Pistonheads where everyone is a Powerfully Built Company Director, almost all new cars arent bought with cash.

survivalist

5,982 posts

202 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
Len Clifton said:
TheDeuce said:
The emissions fines (ULEZ etc) are for all cars that produce emissions, so that's not a wealth level thing. Obviusly it is the case that motoring in general is getting more expensive... But that's why buses are provided.

I guess the real upset is from those that used to have no problem affording personal transport, but now find it a stretch they may not be able to maintain. That's not really the fault of EV introduction though. It's also the case the relative affordability of things does change, it always has. We can each afford only what we can afford and we shouldn't feel so entitled as to expect that to never change.
Difference is, all cars used to be taxed at the same rate. £60 for 6m or £120 per year if I remember correctly. Now, anything with a 2.0 petrol engine made after 2006 will cost its owner almost £800/year. Meanwhile, only reason EV drivers can afford to drive new cars is salary sacrifice, lower VED, and cheap energy tariffs. It’s discrimination against poor people for the benefit of people who work in offices and have off street parking. The answer cannot be that they catch the bus, especially when we need every working age person in work and able to get there.

Level the playing field for EVs vs ICEs and see how many people choose electric.


Edited by Len Clifton on Saturday 15th March 13:58
Over 120,000 cars with 2L+ engines on autotrader with a VED of £200 or less. Which is a fiver more than my EV will cost in Dec this year.

That’s obviously only the ones for sale.

Highest band for older cars is currently £735, but I’d suggest that anyone buying an older car with a 5L V8 bought it knowing that it wouldn’t be a cheap ownership proposition.

If anything, they’ll have to increase taxes on all the EV owners as the market share grows to offset the loss of fuel duty.


Len Clifton

88 posts

2 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
survivalist said:
Len Clifton said:
TheDeuce said:
The emissions fines (ULEZ etc) are for all cars that produce emissions, so that's not a wealth level thing. Obviusly it is the case that motoring in general is getting more expensive... But that's why buses are provided.

I guess the real upset is from those that used to have no problem affording personal transport, but now find it a stretch they may not be able to maintain. That's not really the fault of EV introduction though. It's also the case the relative affordability of things does change, it always has. We can each afford only what we can afford and we shouldn't feel so entitled as to expect that to never change.
Difference is, all cars used to be taxed at the same rate. £60 for 6m or £120 per year if I remember correctly. Now, anything with a 2.0 petrol engine made after 2006 will cost its owner almost £800/year. Meanwhile, only reason EV drivers can afford to drive new cars is salary sacrifice, lower VED, and cheap energy tariffs. It’s discrimination against poor people for the benefit of people who work in offices and have off street parking. The answer cannot be that they catch the bus, especially when we need every working age person in work and able to get there.

Level the playing field for EVs vs ICEs and see how many people choose electric.


Edited by Len Clifton on Saturday 15th March 13:58
Over 120,000 cars with 2L+ engines on autotrader with a VED of £200 or less. Which is a fiver more than my EV will cost in Dec this year.

That’s obviously only the ones for sale.

Highest band for older cars is currently £735, but I’d suggest that anyone buying an older car with a 5L V8 bought it knowing that it wouldn’t be a cheap ownership proposition.

If anything, they’ll have to increase taxes on all the EV owners as the market share grows to offset the loss of fuel duty.
On the other hand….









Pretty much any family petrol or diesel car is being priced off the road

TheDeuce

Original Poster:

27,322 posts

78 months

Saturday 15th March
quotequote all
Len Clifton said:
survivalist said:
Len Clifton said:
TheDeuce said:
The emissions fines (ULEZ etc) are for all cars that produce emissions, so that's not a wealth level thing. Obviusly it is the case that motoring in general is getting more expensive... But that's why buses are provided.

I guess the real upset is from those that used to have no problem affording personal transport, but now find it a stretch they may not be able to maintain. That's not really the fault of EV introduction though. It's also the case the relative affordability of things does change, it always has. We can each afford only what we can afford and we shouldn't feel so entitled as to expect that to never change.
Difference is, all cars used to be taxed at the same rate. £60 for 6m or £120 per year if I remember correctly. Now, anything with a 2.0 petrol engine made after 2006 will cost its owner almost £800/year. Meanwhile, only reason EV drivers can afford to drive new cars is salary sacrifice, lower VED, and cheap energy tariffs. It’s discrimination against poor people for the benefit of people who work in offices and have off street parking. The answer cannot be that they catch the bus, especially when we need every working age person in work and able to get there.

Level the playing field for EVs vs ICEs and see how many people choose electric.


Edited by Len Clifton on Saturday 15th March 13:58
Over 120,000 cars with 2L+ engines on autotrader with a VED of £200 or less. Which is a fiver more than my EV will cost in Dec this year.

That’s obviously only the ones for sale.

Highest band for older cars is currently £735, but I’d suggest that anyone buying an older car with a 5L V8 bought it knowing that it wouldn’t be a cheap ownership proposition.

If anything, they’ll have to increase taxes on all the EV owners as the market share grows to offset the loss of fuel duty.
On the other hand….









Pretty much any family petrol or diesel car is being priced off the road
That family can replace their 16 year dirty shed with a 3 year old EV. The fuel saving should more or less cover the depreciation of the EV.

It might still cost a little more per month but they get a far newer and safer car for the family to enjoy and also are giving less cancer to the other families they drive past.

If that change can be encouraged via tax, why should it not be? If anyone really can't afford it then that's sad, but why would anyone expect to forever be able to afford something? The price of things does change.