The Land and Water Speed Records Thread
Discussion
DJC said:
Google "Skvarm" or squarm or something and supersonic torpedo. That will answer your queries about the above.
Shkval:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval
http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-06/supe...
So does a WSR craft have to be 'on' water, or could it be 'in' water?
dr_gn said:
DJC said:
Google "Skvarm" or squarm or something and supersonic torpedo. That will answer your queries about the above.
Shkval:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval
http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-06/supe...
So does a WSR craft have to be 'on' water, or could it be 'in' water?
yoof full chav said:
I think the general rule with WSR craft, that it has to be some sort of boat, a sumbmersible would be out i think. A manned supercavitating torpedo design would be a no no under the rules i foresee, but it's a good idea, and might be worth a try, if you could get it run partially on the surface
Must admit, I thought the main 'rule' was that control had to be via. contact with water (although I can't find a reference). I guess if it was written that the craft had to be 'in contact with the surface of the water' then a submersible could be allowed: just have the 'rudder' stiking upwards!chevronb37 said:
This bike was at Brooklands a couple of years ago and set an LSR for pedalbikes apparently. Something in the order of 200mph I recall. My friend is pointing out the tagline "Ultimate Bike". Very mature...
I just caught up with this thread and have to call BS on all this roller/chase car bicycling records, surely to be a REAL records it should just be the bike itself (with rider) and no car to follow and actually doing the real MPH, as such the Bike LSR is surely Sam Wittingham- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQwpGLCAMm4 (82.3mph)Back to powered records- I'd really like to see Bloodhound SSC succed at 1000mph but I do worry there is a monumental accident in the background!
I'd also like to see someone have a crack at the wheel driven record, I think its potentially the most breakable LSR record currently unchallenged as its been left "so" long
Echoing what others have said- the water speed record has to be the most dangerous due to the ever-changing nature of a water surface, even a ripple on the flatest lake can disturb the best boat at speed, when that speed is 400+ the results are never good! I've seen very high performance craft upset by wakes at less than 100knots have huge and tragic accidents.
scubadude said:
chevronb37 said:
This bike was at Brooklands a couple of years ago and set an LSR for pedalbikes apparently. Something in the order of 200mph I recall. My friend is pointing out the tagline "Ultimate Bike". Very mature...
I just caught up with this thread and have to call BS on all this roller/chase car bicycling records, surely to be a REAL records it should just be the bike itself (with rider) and no car to follow and actually doing the real MPH, as such the Bike LSR is surely Sam Wittingham- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQwpGLCAMm4 (82.3mph)yoof full chav said:
To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing in the rulebook that says you cant use a car to shadow and help cut out the wind. However, the thing that stops the rollers being recognised as a record, must be that they didnt do a two way average, which is required for it to become an official record. Mind you, that is just my opinion, and i'm sure if you had a good look at the rulebook it would tell you in more deatil
So it'll be okay is SSC Bloodhound follows a missile or jet fighter to "slipstream" then?! Following something to set a speed record has no credibility IMO, whether its legal or not. But especially for bicycles, wind resistance is the biggest hurdle due to the lack of power. Even a normal commuting bike can be got up to motorway speeds if you are willing to tailgate a car or van (if you've got the guts!) TOTALLY different ball game riding solo into stationary air.
Lastly the general public would find that claim very misleading, ask anyone how a Speed Record is set and they'll likely think it means riding, driving, sailing or whatever in a straight line as fast as possible.
Just IMVHO of course :-)
scubadude said:
Echoing what others have said- the water speed record has to be the most dangerous due to the ever-changing nature of a water surface, even a ripple on the flatest lake can disturb the best boat at speed, when that speed is 400+ the results are never good! I've seen very high performance craft upset by wakes at less than 100knots have huge and tragic accidents.
There are ways around that too if you think outside the box. DJC really wants an email about this one.
Life Saab Itch said:
There are ways around that too if you think outside the box.
I assume foils are not allowed ?And hence any sort of underwater finned / winged device which creates sufficient lift to raise the hull clear of the water and hence away from the potentially dangerous surface variations ?
I'm thinking along the lines of the 'foil surfing' they do on the big waves around Hawaii - the boards have a wing device underneath which lifts them clear of the surface and allows them to surf massive waves in big winds without being thrown off the board by every ripple on the surface.
Nick M said:
I assume foils are not allowed ?
And hence any sort of underwater finned / winged device which creates sufficient lift to raise the hull clear of the water and hence away from the potentially dangerous surface variations ?
I'm thinking along the lines of the 'foil surfing' they do on the big waves around Hawaii - the boards have a wing device underneath which lifts them clear of the surface and allows them to surf massive waves in big winds without being thrown off the board by every ripple on the surface.
That's definitely "within the box" and there is a massive downside of friction involved in that.And hence any sort of underwater finned / winged device which creates sufficient lift to raise the hull clear of the water and hence away from the potentially dangerous surface variations ?
I'm thinking along the lines of the 'foil surfing' they do on the big waves around Hawaii - the boards have a wing device underneath which lifts them clear of the surface and allows them to surf massive waves in big winds without being thrown off the board by every ripple on the surface.
I wonder if you could adapt something like this to be steered via. a minimal rudder?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle
dr_gn said:
I wonder if you could adapt something like this to be steered via. a minimal rudder?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle
+1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle
I reckon the safest way is to use the WIG effect as 90%+ of the hull would be out of the water. In theory it should allow for much higher speeds.
Snoggledog said:
+1
I reckon the safest way is to use the WIG effect as 90%+ of the hull would be out of the water. In theory it should allow for much higher speeds.
If someone could find a copy of the WSR rules...it might help. I'm sure all these concepts have been considered and dismissed for good reasons by many prospective challengers. I reckon the safest way is to use the WIG effect as 90%+ of the hull would be out of the water. In theory it should allow for much higher speeds.
'Course that's just me being my usual optimistic self.
The blades that DMC's K7 was running on would have counted as less than 1% of athe area of the hull. When at full speed, only about 1/8th of an inch is actually in the water.
They are by far the best solution. For keeping in contact with the water. If that isn't an issue, you may as well try and buy an ex-Soviet Ekranoplan and hit 400mph on the Caspian sea.
They are by far the best solution. For keeping in contact with the water. If that isn't an issue, you may as well try and buy an ex-Soviet Ekranoplan and hit 400mph on the Caspian sea.
dr_gn said:
If someone could find a copy of the WSR rules...it might help. I'm sure all these concepts have been considered and dismissed for good reasons by many prospective challengers.
'Course that's just me being my usual optimistic self.
It would be a start.'Course that's just me being my usual optimistic self.
I have looked, and I can't seem to find any.
Apart from asking the Quicksilver "team" for a copy, I guess you should ask the body that would be in charge of the verification.
I have no idea who that is though.
Life Saab Itch said:
I guess you should ask the body that would be in charge of the verification.
I have no idea who that is though.
This lot:I have no idea who that is though.
http://www.uimpowerboating.com/vsite/vtrial/page/h...
Nick M said:
No relevant regs that I can find on that site.scubadude said:
yoof full chav said:
To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing in the rulebook that says you cant use a car to shadow and help cut out the wind. However, the thing that stops the rollers being recognised as a record, must be that they didnt do a two way average, which is required for it to become an official record. Mind you, that is just my opinion, and i'm sure if you had a good look at the rulebook it would tell you in more deatil
So it'll be okay is SSC Bloodhound follows a missile or jet fighter to "slipstream" then?! Following something to set a speed record has no credibility IMO, whether its legal or not. But especially for bicycles, wind resistance is the biggest hurdle due to the lack of power. Even a normal commuting bike can be got up to motorway speeds if you are willing to tailgate a car or van (if you've got the guts!) TOTALLY different ball game riding solo into stationary air.
Lastly the general public would find that claim very misleading, ask anyone how a Speed Record is set and they'll likely think it means riding, driving, sailing or whatever in a straight line as fast as possible.
Just IMVHO of course :-)
Now if you asked a member of the public which was more record like in its execution, then i am sure some guy peddling his bike 10feet behind a modified doge viper from a stanstill, would hold more merit than some guy in a car who has to be pushed up to 60mph before he can set off under his own steam so to speak.
I dont disagree with you on the point of following the car, but them's the rules im afraid.
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff