RE: Jaw-dropping Jaguar D-Type Continuation for sale

RE: Jaw-dropping Jaguar D-Type Continuation for sale

Yesterday

Jaw-dropping Jaguar D-Type Continuation for sale

It's 70 years since the D-Type's first Le Mans win - what better way to celebrate than with a road-legal one?


Sometimes it can feel like every classic Jaguar lives in the shadow of the E-Type. It’s the roadgoing sports car that all others must aspire to, even those saloons that it shared engines with, and the historic racer of unrivalled pedigree. Its popularity in motorsport to this day continues that mystique. The E-Type is the Jaguar, or so it can seem. 

But there’s an old Jag far more valuable, significant and successful (at least in terms of racing) than the E: the D-Type. Two pretty different sports cars, yes, but the latter was the car that cemented Jaguar’s reputation as one of the best sportscar manufacturers in the world during the middle part of the 20th century. The D-Type’s design was innovative (and highly effective), plus the use of disc brakes with the tech still in its infancy gave the Jag a big advantage over its competitors. 

That you’ll know, most likely, because there are few cars as recognisable as a D-Type and an equally small number with such a storied motorsport career. It won the 24 Hours of Le Mans three times in a row from 1955 to 1957, and in the final year of dominance, there were five D-Types in the top six. It was quite simply the class of its field. Almost a decade ago, a D-Type made £15m at auction - no E-Type is ever going to do that. 

It wasn’t long after that stunning auction result that Jaguar announced the D-Type Continuation cars, a run of 25 to account for those not built in the period because of the Browns Lane Fire. (The original plan was for 100, and 75 were made in the 50s.) They would be assembled by Jaguar Land Rover Classic Works in Coventry, building on the experience of the similar XKSS and E-Type projects; Continuation buyers would be able to choose from either the 1955 Short Nose or 1956 Long Nose spec, plus whichever colour took their fancy. And that was kind of that; the D-Type Continuation was announced at Retromobile back in February 2018, it’s easy to imagine all 25 were allocated at the show, and they probably all enjoy pampered lives in collections across the globe. 

Only now there’s a chance to own one. This Continuation, a 2019 build (which definitely looks a bit strange next to images of a D-Type), is for sale at Hilton and Moss in Essex. It’s road registered in the UK and has covered just 500 miles with one ‘meticulous’ owner since new. This one is to ‘56 Long Nose spec, with Pastel Blue paint and Old English White ‘lipstick’ on the front. Apparently, the interior is ‘Aged Tan’, which looks fabulous - best ensure your driving gloves match. 

Of course, the whole thing is utterly glorious, really, because it’s a barely used example of a sportscar racing icon built to exacting standards. While it promises to be a truly unforgettable experience wherever it’s used next, it only feels right for the D-Type to find its way back on track at some point. It was designed to race, after all, and its reputation was forged on circuit. Let’s hope whatever the colossal asking price is for this one doesn’t curtail that enthusiasm too much… 


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Fetchez la vache

Original Poster:

5,728 posts

226 months

Of *all* the cars I've physically seen on the roads while my time on this earth, *nothing* has looked more otherworldly than a D-Type on the M4.

AndyNetwork

1,847 posts

206 months

I've always been a little confused by the continuation D-Types.

There were 9 D-Type/XKSS cars at various points in convertion destroyed in the fire at Browns lane.

Jaguar then built 25 continuation XKSS cars, so already 16 cars over the number destroyed. Presumably, these 16 were some that weren't built and the donor D-Types scrapped, as they had better things to be concentrating on following the fire.

So, my question is:

Where did the extra 25 cars come from to build the continuation D-Types?

TA14

12,919 posts

270 months

320 bhp in less than a tonne is good today.

Watcher of the skies

769 posts

49 months

Fetchez la vache said:
Of *all* the cars I've physically seen on the roads while my time on this earth, *nothing* has looked more otherworldly than a D-Type on the M4.
Ditto en route to Le Mans a few years back - and there were a lot of special cars on the road that day.
Shouldn't it have a period looking battery?

mrclav

1,531 posts

235 months

Fetchez la vache said:
Of *all* the cars I've physically seen on the roads while my time on this earth, *nothing* has looked more otherworldly than a D-Type on the M4.
Oh I don't know about that - seeing an Apollo Intensa (I think that's what they're called?) on the M4, is a more otherworldly looking car than any D-Type. Not saying it's a good-looking car, mind; it's just unlike anything I've ever seen. There a a fair amount of of cars from the D-Type's era that look of the same ilk - Ferrari's 330 TRI and Aston's DB3S immediately come to mind.

LotusOmega375D

8,469 posts

165 months

AndyNetwork said:
I've always been a little confused by the continuation D-Types.

There were 9 D-Type/XKSS cars at various points in convertion destroyed in the fire at Browns lane.

Jaguar then built 25 continuation XKSS cars, so already 16 cars over the number destroyed. Presumably, these 16 were some that weren't built and the donor D-Types scrapped, as they had better things to be concentrating on following the fire.

So, my question is:

Where did the extra 25 cars come from to build the continuation D-Types?
All 25 are new cars with no original parts aren’t they? Like their C-Type and XK-SS continuations. The number 25 presumably was just an arbitrary one, possibly based on how many they thought they could sell at the price quoted. I did think they weren’t road legal in the UK though.

r5kdt

361 posts

197 months

That is a thing of beauty

aeropilot

37,697 posts

239 months

AndyNetwork said:
I've always been a little confused by the continuation D-Types.

There were 9 D-Type/XKSS cars at various points in convertion destroyed in the fire at Browns lane.

Jaguar then built 25 continuation XKSS cars, so already 16 cars over the number destroyed. Presumably, these 16 were some that weren't built and the donor D-Types scrapped, as they had better things to be concentrating on following the fire.

So, my question is:

Where did the extra 25 cars come from to build the continuation D-Types?
Happy to be corrected on this, but, IIRC, the 25 number was the allocated chassis numbers in the Jaguar chassis number 'book' that were
already allocated but never finished. So, in Jag's eyes, they were just finishing building the cars they were originally supposed to.......just 60 years later.


British Beef

2,458 posts

177 months


Simply stunning!!


AndyNetwork

1,847 posts

206 months

aeropilot said:
AndyNetwork said:
I've always been a little confused by the continuation D-Types.

There were 9 D-Type/XKSS cars at various points in convertion destroyed in the fire at Browns lane.

Jaguar then built 25 continuation XKSS cars, so already 16 cars over the number destroyed. Presumably, these 16 were some that weren't built and the donor D-Types scrapped, as they had better things to be concentrating on following the fire.

So, my question is:

Where did the extra 25 cars come from to build the continuation D-Types?
Happy to be corrected on this, but, IIRC, the 25 number was the allocated chassis numbers in the Jaguar chassis number 'book' that were
already allocated but never finished. So, in Jag's eyes, they were just finishing building the cars they were originally supposed to.......just 60 years later.
Yep - This was my understanding too - But as the XKSS was a road converted D-Type, there was only ever 25 unbuilt D-Type/XKSS cars. They built 25 continuation XKSS cars in 2016, and then another 25 D-Type's int 2019. So 25 cars over what they had chassis numbers for.

WPA

11,491 posts

126 months

Lovely car but horrible colour

RizzoTheRat

26,536 posts

204 months

That's beautiful.

A museum near me has a XKSS, which I never even new existed until I visited few years ago. Much better looking than the E-Type.

mooseracer

2,299 posts

182 months

I may be a heathen but that "lipstick" would need to go

ntiz

2,509 posts

148 months

AndyNetwork said:
aeropilot said:
AndyNetwork said:
I've always been a little confused by the continuation D-Types.

There were 9 D-Type/XKSS cars at various points in convertion destroyed in the fire at Browns lane.

Jaguar then built 25 continuation XKSS cars, so already 16 cars over the number destroyed. Presumably, these 16 were some that weren't built and the donor D-Types scrapped, as they had better things to be concentrating on following the fire.

So, my question is:

Where did the extra 25 cars come from to build the continuation D-Types?
Happy to be corrected on this, but, IIRC, the 25 number was the allocated chassis numbers in the Jaguar chassis number 'book' that were
already allocated but never finished. So, in Jag's eyes, they were just finishing building the cars they were originally supposed to.......just 60 years later.
Yep - This was my understanding too - But as the XKSS was a road converted D-Type, there was only ever 25 unbuilt D-Type/XKSS cars. They built 25 continuation XKSS cars in 2016, and then another 25 D-Type's int 2019. So 25 cars over what they had chassis numbers for.
Let me help you.

It’s twaddle to justify knocking out recreations of their most famous cars. Whenever it suits them they will find another page at the back of the mystical filing cabinet with another 25 chassis numbers they can use.

It’s how the set themselves apart from the others that they sued for doing the same.

thegreenhell

18,840 posts

231 months

It looks like a scale model in those photos.

thegreenhell

18,840 posts

231 months

ntiz said:
Let me help you.

It’s twaddle to justify knocking out recreations of their most famous cars. Whenever it suits them they will find another page at the back of the mystical filing cabinet with another 25 chassis numbers they can use.

It’s how the set themselves apart from the others that they sued for doing the same.
This is pretty much it, but there's no need for them to do that. The clue is in the name - continuation. It makes no difference if the chassis numbers were allocated years ago or yesterday, just continue the sequence.

GT40 MkI chassis numbers started at GT40P-1000 and stopped at 1086 in period. They are now well past number 2500 with all the official continuation cars that have been built by Safir, Superformance and others.

Augustus Windsock

3,584 posts

167 months

A car of such beauty and perfection that to me it’s as if God Himself reached down, His hand passed across the blank design papers, and lo! The D-type was born.
However, I don’t think this set of images is the most flattering, the one taken from the o/s/f reminds me of…

Austin Prefect

617 posts

4 months

What are the chances of a continuation XJ13?

LotusOmega375D

8,469 posts

165 months

You could say they already did that with the “original” XJ13 after the 1971 MIRA crash.


Robertb

2,543 posts

250 months

Austin Prefect said:
What are the chances of a continuation XJ13?
Have you seen the one JD Classics built last year?
Its even got a quad-cam Jaguar V12

https://www.carthrottle.com/news/theres-now-second...