Used 2016 c350e nigh miler.. bad idea?

Used 2016 c350e nigh miler.. bad idea?

Author
Discussion

119

Original Poster:

11,992 posts

51 months

Looking for an estate car and the market seems to be flooded with diesels, which, for barely 50 miles a week is unlikely to be trouble free motoring so am trying to avoid those.

So with that, started looking at petrol alternatives around the budget of 7-8k and a few of these have popped up albeit with 120k plus miles on them.

I note that they had starter issues but due to the age an mileage on them I am assuming they have been replaced with the updated version.

That aside does anyone have any experience of them with these sort of miles on?

Anything to be wary of as it seems to be a lot of car for the money!


raspy

2,041 posts

109 months

I got rid of mine around 60k miles, partly because I didn't trust the reliability of the hybrid system once the official 6 year/60k factory hybrid warranty ran out.

You could argue that because there are so many for sale that have done 100k miles and up, then the hybrid system is more durable and reliable than one would think, but I didn't want to take that chance myself (at least not compared to Toyota durability and reliability of hybrids)

I had no issues apart from a new thermostat and some minor corroded wiring on the air suspension.

No change in electric range even at 6 years old. Car was lovely to drive on electric, but battery didn't last very long (as low as 3 miles in winter/up to 9-10 in summer) but obviously it always would have some battery left at any time, to provide electrical assistance when more acceleration needed.

I would "lose" 1 mile of range just driving from my driveway up to the end of the road (400ft) and the 2 litre petrol engine fitted to the car was rather thirsty.

Like any MB with airmatic, make sure it's ok before you purchase it.


Dewi 2

1,655 posts

80 months

Yesterday (06:18)
quotequote all

119 said:
Looking for an estate car and the market seems to be flooded with diesels, which, for barely 50 miles a week is unlikely to be trouble free motoring so am trying to avoid those.

So with that, started looking at petrol alternatives around the budget of 7-8k and a few of these have popped up albeit with 120k plus miles on them.

The worrying part for me, is that little letter e after the 350.
Presumably the car is a plug-in hybrid.

Some white ago, I had assumed that if a high voltage battery failed, it would not be a problem because there is a perfectly good petrol engine under the bonnet. In other words, carry on driving petrol only.
Apparently not. It seems with M-Bs, that the petrol and hybrid systems work in conjunction. Perfect harmony.

When high voltage battery failure occurs, the choice appears to be, either pay about £20,000 for a replacement battery to be fitted, or have a garden ornament. At least being an estate, it might be handy as a garden tools store.

raspy

2,041 posts

109 months

Dewi 2 said:

The worrying part for me, is that little letter e after the 350.
Presumably the car is a plug-in hybrid.

Some white ago, I had assumed that if a high voltage battery failed, it would not be a problem because there is a perfectly good petrol engine under the bonnet. In other words, carry on driving petrol only.
Apparently not. It seems with M-Bs, that the petrol and hybrid systems work in conjunction. Perfect harmony.

When high voltage battery failure occurs, the choice appears to be, either pay about £20,000 for a replacement battery to be fitted, or have a garden ornament. At least being an estate, it might be handy as a garden tools store.
Or get a used battery fitted. They are much cheaper than a brand new one from MB.

Dewi 2

1,655 posts

80 months


raspy said:
Or get a used battery fitted. They are much cheaper than a brand new one from MB.

For me, that would introduce a huge risk.
Impossible to know whether a second hand main lithium battery, might contain a faulty cell.

I do also wonder what view an insurance company might take.
They seem to be very nervous about lithium batteries. When an EV has been carelessly driven over a high kerb, denting the battery casing, even almost new vehicles have been written off by insurers.

That example of accidental damage could not happen to a Mercedes-Benz PHEV, because the battery is not located below the floor, but it does reveal insurers concerns about the risk of subsequent fires.

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/electriccars/a...

TarquinMX5

2,248 posts

95 months

Dewi 2 said:

119 said:
Looking for an estate car and the market seems to be flooded with diesels, which, for barely 50 miles a week is unlikely to be trouble free motoring so am trying to avoid those.

So with that, started looking at petrol alternatives around the budget of 7-8k and a few of these have popped up albeit with 120k plus miles on them.

The worrying part for me, is that little letter e after the 350.
Presumably the car is a plug-in hybrid.

Some white ago, I had assumed that if a high voltage battery failed, it would not be a problem because there is a perfectly good petrol engine under the bonnet. In other words, carry on driving petrol only.
Apparently not. It seems with M-Bs, that the petrol and hybrid systems work in conjunction. Perfect harmony.
It's not just MB unfortunately; as far as I can see they're all the same, and many cars which I've previously thought were 'only' petrol now turn out to be mild hybrids.

Dewi 2

1,655 posts

80 months


TarquinMX5 said:
It's not just MB unfortunately; as far as I can see they're all the same, and many cars which I've previously thought were 'only' petrol now turn out to be mild hybrids.

I think I have managed to at least get some understanding about all this electric stuff, in particular the Mercedes-Benz mild hybrid system.
The longevity of the various electric systems was important to me, because of continuing to use each of my cars for a long time (M-B CLK 320 for 24 years).

For me, that ruled out an EV and PHEV, they won't be usable for 24 years.

The Mercedes-Benz mild hybrid system (W213 facelift) works brilliantly. The battery is modest size and only 48 volts (cannot move the car) so replaceent is far less expensive than an EV or PHEV.
Some of these systems involve drive belts, but the M-B electric motor is positioned between the engine and the transmission. It can therefore directly rotate the crankshaft. The motor's purpose is to replace the starter motor and alternator, in addition provide power to fill- in for 'turbo lag'.

When starting the engine, there is an uncanny sense of no sound or feeling. The engine is just suddenly running.
The instant and smooth engine starting, makes the Stop/Start system unintrusive and comfortable to just leave switched on.
However, after a while it occurred to me that at the initial moment when an engine starts, there will not be any oil pressure. Thousands of additional engine starts is perhaps not good for the longevity of IC engines, so I now switch off the system.

Two odd points;
The DVLA class the fuel type as 'Hybrid Electric (Clean).
At MoT no emissions test is needed.

It is simply powered by the petrol engine. Fuel consumption is impressive though. On a long journey, my CLK 320 was about 35 mpg, the E200 is about 45 mpg and the performance figures of the two cars are almost identical. There are very few petrol E Class cars in the UK. Diesel is still more popular.

Hope that might reduce your concerns about mild hybrids, but I have only described the M-B type of mild hybrid.


Edited by Dewi 2 on Thursday 17th July 14:23