Aircraft for the price of a new Beemer...

Aircraft for the price of a new Beemer...

Author
Discussion

Oily Nails

Original Poster:

2,932 posts

215 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
A bit of a debate started down the local last night after a flash bugger pulled up in a new Z4 wearing a pink shirt and shades rolleyes
If you were successful/rich enough why buy 'another' executive saloon , like a full spec 7 Series BMW?(assuming you already have other cars)
For the same kind of money (about £100,000GBP) you could buy a plane!
But what would YOU get for that amount?

I fancy one of these, and I'll have change for an Elise wink



An Antonov An-2 just because it looks like you could crash it and still take-off in it (and as its a soviet designing...you probably can biggrin)

Geneve

3,977 posts

234 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Yes.

There seem to be a lot of people who spend a fortune chopping and changing their various prestige sports cars, yet still appearing somewhat unfullfilled.

Whilst cars a fine for their day-to-day practicality and useability, IMO, many car owners should broaden their horizons and enjoy the wonderful world of aviation. There are penty of opportunities, whatever the budget, from gliding and microlights to helicopters and jets.

General aviation could do with more new, enthusiastic, participants. And, it's interesting that three of the most prominent 'petrolheads' share a passion for flying - Clarkson is an enthuisiast, May has a Champion Decathlon, and Hammond is training for his PPL(H). Can we expect 'Top Landing Gear'?

jagracer

8,248 posts

251 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Oily Nails said:
A bit of a debate started down the local last night after a flash bugger pulled up in a new Z4 wearing a pink shirt and shades rolleyes
If you were successful/rich enough why buy 'another' executive saloon , like a full spec 7 Series BMW?(assuming you already have other cars)
For the same kind of money (about £100,000GBP) you could buy a plane!
But what would YOU get for that amount?

I fancy one of these, and I'll have change for an Elise wink



An Antonov An-2 just because it looks like you could crash it and still take-off in it (and as its a soviet designing...you probably can biggrin)
Maybe running costs would put you a plane especially the one above. A top 7 series BM would cost peanuts to run compared with even a cheap light aircraft.

SlipStream77

2,153 posts

206 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
I may be wrong but I think that Antonov may be largest and/or heaviest single engine piston aeroplane ever made. I'm sure I read it somewhere, can anyone confirm it?

eharding

14,541 posts

299 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Oily Nails said:
A bit of a debate started down the local last night after a flash bugger pulled up in a new Z4 wearing a pink shirt and shades rolleyes
If you were successful/rich enough why buy 'another' executive saloon , like a full spec 7 Series BMW?(assuming you already have other cars)
For the same kind of money (about £100,000GBP) you could buy a plane!
But what would YOU get for that amount?

I fancy one of these, and I'll have change for an Elise wink



An Antonov An-2 just because it looks like you could crash it and still take-off in it (and as its a soviet designing...you probably can biggrin)
Pumps out about 1000 horsepower, burns 300 litres of avgas an hour, and in that hour won't even get you 100nm from where you started, but great if someone else is picking up the bills.

There a number of far nicer things you could spend your £100K on - some of them here:

http://www.aerobatics.org.uk/aircraft+eqpt-for-sal...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Oily Nails said:

I fancy one of these, and I'll have change for an Elise wink



An Antonov An-2 just because it looks like you could crash it and still take-off in it (and as its a soviet designing...you probably can biggrin)
My neighbour used to fly in those things. Bits kept falling off and the pilots were pissed.

He got through a lot of underpants....

Oily Nails

Original Poster:

2,932 posts

215 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
OK OK as I said it started as a pub debate, so clearly there were going to be some holes in the plan biggrin

Still would though biggrin

anonymous-user

69 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
I've flown an An-2. Don't buy one of them whatever you do. hehe

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Oily Nails said:
OK OK as I said it started as a pub debate, so clearly there were going to be some holes in the plan biggrin
Just as long as you know your place....smile

Talksteer

5,309 posts

248 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Well I know a bloke at work who had a share in a Jet Provost, he said it eventually ended up costing all of his money beyond his mortgage and enough for surviving off Tesco value spam. That said he's an engineer so not quite paid mega bucks.

The maintenance is what kills you, once example he gave was that often it wouldn't start up due to some issue with its 1950's tech valve electronics. The solution was to remove the valves and tap them. But you aren't legally allowed to do that instead you had to pay £500 to call out a mechanic a distance of 100 yards to do a 30 second job.

JW911

929 posts

210 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
For the price of a BMW M3, you can have a Yak-52. Turns upside down and burns less fuel than the An-2. Only 60 litres an hour. Running costs are a bit more though (our maintenance bill last year was around £15k).

JW911

929 posts

210 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Talksteer said:
Well I know a bloke at work who had a share in a Jet Provost, he said it eventually ended up costing all of his money beyond his mortgage and enough for surviving off Tesco value spam. That said he's an engineer so not quite paid mega bucks.

The maintenance is what kills you, once example he gave was that often it wouldn't start up due to some issue with its 1950's tech valve electronics. The solution was to remove the valves and tap them. But you aren't legally allowed to do that instead you had to pay £500 to call out a mechanic a distance of 100 yards to do a 30 second job.
A mate of one of the chaps at the flying club used to own a Hunter. They spent £18k one weekend just on fuel!! bow

Lefty Guns

18,242 posts

217 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
JW911 said:
For the price of a BMW M3, you can have a Yak-52. Turns upside down and burns less fuel than the An-2. Only 60 litres an hour. Running costs are a bit more though (our maintenance bill last year was around £15k).
Is £15k your average spend per year or was that including major work?

60 litres per hour doesn't seem too bad. What does avgas cost? And at what cruising speed will it return 60 l/hr?

Lefty

Edited by Lefty Guns on Monday 13th July 10:10

Moose.

5,345 posts

256 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Cheapest way to own an aircraft is to make sure it's on an LAA Permit to Fly. That way you (with the assistance of an LAA engineer) can do all the maintenance yourself.

As for what to buy, I'd have a Vans RV-8 thanks smile

Lefty Guns

18,242 posts

217 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Moose. said:
Cheapest way to own an aircraft is to make sure it's on an LAA Permit to Fly. That way you (with the assistance of an LAA engineer) can do all the maintenance yourself.

As for what to buy, I'd have a Vans RV-8 thanks smile
I had to google it but that's a lovely thing cloud9

What's the significance of LAA? Is it classed as a microlight or something? And is that why you can maintain it yourself?

Lefty

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

276 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Lefty Guns said:
JW911 said:
For the price of a BMW M3, you can have a Yak-52. Turns upside down and burns less fuel than the An-2. Only 60 litres an hour. Running costs are a bit more though (our maintenance bill last year was around £15k).
Is £15k your average spend per year or was that including major work?

60 litres per hour doesn't seem too bad. What does avgas cost? And at what cruising speed will it return 60 l/hr?

Lefty

Edited by Lefty Guns on Monday 13th July 10:10
YAKs are not for cruising.

Lefty Guns

18,242 posts

217 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Lefty Guns said:
JW911 said:
For the price of a BMW M3, you can have a Yak-52. Turns upside down and burns less fuel than the An-2. Only 60 litres an hour. Running costs are a bit more though (our maintenance bill last year was around £15k).
Is £15k your average spend per year or was that including major work?

60 litres per hour doesn't seem too bad. What does avgas cost? And at what cruising speed will it return 60 l/hr?

Lefty

Edited by Lefty Guns on Monday 13th July 10:10
YAKs are not for cruising.
I know but I was trying to get an idea of how realistic the 60 l/hr figure was.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
YAKs are not for cruising.
I think vixpy once tried to shag one...

eharding

14,541 posts

299 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Lefty Guns said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Lefty Guns said:
JW911 said:
For the price of a BMW M3, you can have a Yak-52. Turns upside down and burns less fuel than the An-2. Only 60 litres an hour. Running costs are a bit more though (our maintenance bill last year was around £15k).
Is £15k your average spend per year or was that including major work?

60 litres per hour doesn't seem too bad. What does avgas cost? And at what cruising speed will it return 60 l/hr?

Lefty

Edited by Lefty Guns on Monday 13th July 10:10
YAKs are not for cruising.
I know but I was trying to get an idea of how realistic the 60 l/hr figure was.
You can *just* get 60l an hour if you fly at 60% RPM, with the manifold pressure all the way back at about 60cm, which will result in about 210-220 kmh, depending on the amount of pie-induced drag on board. It does feel like you're crawling about the place though. At max-sustainable-hooligan 82% power, I reckon the fuel
burn is more like 180l an hour, and at full-lunchtime-emergency 100% power even worse. The other feature of the Yak M-14P engine is that the mixture control is an automatic barometric affair, meaning you can't manually lean the mixture.

The year's maintenance bill JW911 was referring to actually came to just over £19K, but that was hugely inflated by the monumental £17K annual, which included the wings-off airframe overhaul required at this point - even so, the original quote
was for £4K. The sad fact is, some maintenance organisations are starting to price themselves out of the market, but recent changes in the maintenance regulations handed out by the CAA mean it's much harder to shop around between engineering
outfits, and they know this.

In the good old days, when you could run a Yak on the Russian register in the UK, maintenance was cheap as chips - literally.

In the late 1990's when our syndicate was set up, the group used to ship in a Lithuanian engineer with the right credentials, who would live in the hangar for a week to do the annual being fed a constant diet of fish-and-chips, and would complete the annual and sign-off for a couple of hundred quid - and everyone was happy.

Sadly, those days have gone.

Lefty Guns

18,242 posts

217 months

Monday 13th July 2009
quotequote all
Thanks, that's an interesting post. £4k to £17k!!! eek