Why are so many new cars so badly styled?

Why are so many new cars so badly styled?

Author
Discussion

NR91

Original Poster:

272 posts

160 months

Saturday 27th May 2017
quotequote all
I know the 'they don't make cars like they used to' debate gets done to death here but I've felt an increased need to rant regarding a lot of manufacturers and the way they're styling their cars now.


Does anyone else agree that cars which have previously had clean, attractive and cohesive designs are increasingly being replaced (not just facelifted) by cars with vague, clunky and mismatched designs that just don't seem to work from most angles? I'm not saying they're ugly but they certainly leave a lot to be desired.


For example, I am far from a Vauxhall fan, but the Astra GTC was one of the most well styled hatchbacks I can think of. The new Astra isn't an ugly car IMO, however it looks worse and arguably older in every way to me. Same with the Corsa and Insignia (the new 'Grand Sport' looks dated already!)


Here's my personal dislikes:
- Vauxhall Corsa, Astra, Insignia (new models look older than the old models)
- Skoda Octavia (stupid split front lights)
- Audi A4/A5 (boring design with blobby proportions)
- Mini Clubman (rear lights!)
- DS range (ugly grill)
- BMW 5 series (bloated)
- Most Mercedes rear ends (vaguely shaped and unflattering)
- Aston DB11 (fussy)
- Honda Civic (fussy and too much plastic)
- Smart Fortwo/four (too toy-like)

I can't tell if these designs are intentionally crap or if it's just too many people making decisions and ending up with an incohesive product! I was thinking of other examples and wonder if you guys have any to add or if you disagree?

NR91

Original Poster:

272 posts

160 months

Sunday 28th May 2017
quotequote all
I agree with those saying that it does seem to limited to certain cars and manufacturers.

Volvo and Mazda do indeed make pleasing designs to my eyes. Although saying that I despise the rear end of the new S90!