RE: Jaguar XJ-S: Spotted

RE: Jaguar XJ-S: Spotted

Sunday 4th February 2018

Jaguar XJ-S: Spotted

How about a gold standard Jag XJ-S that differs from the rest? This one requires manual labour...



Manual XJ-Ss made up less than eight per cent of total production. So, by that token, does it make it worthy of Spotted material? We like to highlight the rare and unusual in our classifieds, and a Jaguar that forces you to change your own gears is as unheard of as a Jaguar owner having to pay for their own dinner.

The XJ-S was already 10 years old by the time this example was built, and it was more of a car for the head of a company - or a BL executive picking from the company car scheme. It came with a thirsty V12, which was definitely the perfect engine to have off the back of an oil crisis. Jaguar also needed to put some development miles on its new AJ6 straight-six engine before it went into full-scale production in the XJ40. So, some bright spark at Jaguar thought that it would be a good idea to put it in the XJ-S.


And to be fair, the 3.6 engine is lighter than the 5.3, which meant that the six-cylinder car was less nose heavy. It also meant that Jag could reduce both the spring and anti-roll bar rates at the front, and that no doubt brought benefits to ride comfort - a Jaguar hallmark. The manual version would make more use of the engine's power. This meant that performance figures not a million miles away from the V12: 7.4sec to 60mph compared with 6.5 of the bigger engine.

The trouble is, the manual isn't as good as it could be. The shift action - when it was new - was reported in the 21st April 1984 road test of Autocar to be 'notchy, heavy, and certainly baulky if hurried'. So, it isn't really an everyday car, but if you are spending £20k on a low-mileage example, I don't think you would be.

And if you compare it with contemporary rivals, the XJ-S stacked up rather well. If you wanted a Porsche, you would need the four-cylinder 944 and that had a lower top speed. Audi had the Quattro, but that was a £1,154 more expensive and wasn't as powerful. The closest rival was the BMW 635CSi with its silky straight-six engine, comfortable ride, strong performance and much better Getrag gearbox. Trouble is, it cost a not inconsiderable amount of money back then - nearly £25k! The XJ-S, by comparison, was a bargain.


So, while the manual XJ-S might not be the best version to have, it doesn't stop it from being an interesting classic. I mean, we still like Austin-Healeys and AC Cobras despite them being a little difficult to drive. No, this is a rather nice, unusual XJ-S in an excellent colour that really stands out. Plus, there's even air conditioning to prevent you building up a sweat while changing your own gears.


SPECIFICATION - 1985 JAGUAR XJ-S 3.6

Engine: 3,590cc, straight-six
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 228@5,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 240@4,000rpm
MPG: 17.6
CO2: Gases out the paupers
First registered: 1985
Recorded mileage: 26,000
Price new: £19,248
Yours for: £19,999

See the original advert here.

Author
Discussion

Hugh Jarse

Original Poster:

3,524 posts

206 months

Sunday 4th February 2018
quotequote all
Chap has one at work, looks wonderful.
A rare thing, unique styling that has never been copied.