Health and safety Nazis!

Author
Discussion

daveparry

Original Poster:

988 posts

200 months

Friday 20th December 2013
quotequote all
The company I work for has decided that because an idiot cut himself with a Stanley knife....they are now BANNED completely, then they decided that it would be mandatory to wear gloves while at work!!! followed up with "no latex gloves because someone "may" be latex intolerant"......Ladders are BANNED! Rigger Boots are BANNED.....I could go on!

Am I wrong to think that the Health and safety at work act 1974 is LAW but that what it contains is just ADVICE!

They are driving me up the frigging wall!

Taita

7,602 posts

203 months

Friday 20th December 2013
quotequote all
The vast majority of things hailed as ELF N SAFETY aren't actually required in any way at all.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/


anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
Much easier to ban things than to carry out proper risk assessments.

RichS

351 posts

214 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
Taita said:
The vast majority of things hailed as ELF N SAFETY aren't actually required in any way at all.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/
Reading some of these I almost feel sorry for the HSE. What utter rot people come up with clearly just to avoid being arsed to do something or help someone.

daveparry

Original Poster:

988 posts

200 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
My point is, as I said to my manager...The HSE Act 1974 is the Law, BUT what the Act contains is simply guidance and advice on how the Law is interperated to which he hid behind that old favourite "company policy"

KingNothing

3,168 posts

153 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
We have to wear safety glass here all the time, now the only way I'm going to get an eye injury when walking around the factory is if someone runs up and pokes me in the eye, but it's all in the name of health and safety, rather than just letting people use their common sense to work out when they actually need to be wearing glasses.

MajorProblem

4,700 posts

164 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
The railway is just as bad,

I was bked twice on my last project for not wearing safety glasses,

Once when going for a piss and another when eating my pack up.

The place is riddled with morons enforcing this crap as it's an easy career move and no one can argue with health and safety can they.


matlee

777 posts

151 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
Most of my work is in the retail refurb sector and the company im contracting to at the moment (and many of the other big companies) have a 'Full PPE to be worn at all times' policy which is gloves, glasses, toe caps, hi viz and helmets.

There are times where you feel quite ridiculous especially on the live stores during the night shift where i could be in the baked bean aisle setting something out with a very dangerous permanent marker pen and a set of drawings fully PPE'd up right next to a bean stacker whos has got zero PPE on.

Step ladders are banned, no rigger boots, a ladder permit system in place, 2 set of hot works permits to fill out even for one small cut with a recip saw, god knows how many risk assessments and method statements....the list goes on and on and all the while im still expected to make sure the work is done on time!


There was one particular retailer i done work for who brought in a PPE policy of gloves, glassed, hi viz, boots and helmet but had to be said retailer issued PPE. Imagine the looks on the contractors faces when i had to tell them you cant come on site with that helmet because its the wrong colour or you cant come on site because your glasses are the wrong style. I st you not.






GG89

3,527 posts

186 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
The vast majority of HSE is utter utter bks.

Makes me even more thankful to be self employed.

hidetheelephants

24,193 posts

193 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
matlee said:
2 set of hot works permits to fill out even for one small cut with a recip saw, god knows how many risk assessments and method statements.
confused Hot work usually = grinding, welding, burning etc.

If you can put your finger on it(obviously a bad idea with a recip saw hehe) it's not hot work.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
daveparry said:
My point is, as I said to my manager...The HSE Act 1974 is the Law, BUT what the Act contains is simply guidance and advice on how the Law is interperated to which he hid behind that old favourite "company policy"
Easier for you to take that view, your not the one who will be fked over by the HSE when some idiot hurts himself.

matlee

777 posts

151 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
matlee said:
2 set of hot works permits to fill out even for one small cut with a recip saw, god knows how many risk assessments and method statements.
confused Hot work usually = grinding, welding, burning etc.

If you can put your finger on it(obviously a bad idea with a recip saw hehe) it's not hot work.
With us it's anything that produces heat or could cause a spark.

Muntu

7,635 posts

199 months

Saturday 21st December 2013
quotequote all
MajorProblem said:
The book needs to learn to speak English.

GadgeS3C

4,516 posts

164 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
In the recent windy weather I was nearly hit by a flying health and safety sign that had been blown off the fencing around some building work.

It was almost worth throwing myself in front of it to pursue a claim. I reckon I could have got some nice media coverage out of that one!

biggrin

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
daveparry said:
My point is, as I said to my manager...The HSE Act 1974 is the Law, BUT what the Act contains is simply guidance and advice on how the Law is interperated to which he hid behind that old favourite "company policy"
Easier for you to take that view, your not the one who will be fked over by the HSE when some idiot hurts himself.
exactly

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
BIANCO said:
I hate it to it must be costing the economy millions, all jobs take twice as long and so cost twice as much. Whatever happend to common sense and if you do hurt yourself it’s your own fault.
The aggressive marketing built up around no win no fee, as contributed to the current situation, this also creates the scenario where blanket policies are put place over PPE etc.


as an aside to blanket policies, interestingly In the place I currently work a red high vis seems to make you invulnerable and therefore not require safety footwear or bump hat - which if an operative, team leader or supervisor did it would result in being sent home that day followed by informal disciplinary for staff / final warning of cancellation for agency staff. the bump hat stuff is bks as if a pallet full of of product fell off the racking even a rescue helmet wouldn;t save your head -but it;s a blanekt policy in the racking, the safety shoe stuff is important given the number of pallet trucks ( both hand and powered) and various flavours of forklift running around, not to mention dock levellers, pallet inverters etc etc ...

The costs of not using safe systems of work and proper techniques are far greater than the costs of doing so.


Tannedbaldhead

2,952 posts

132 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
daveparry said:
My point is, as I said to my manager...The HSE Act 1974 is the Law, BUT what the Act contains is simply guidance and advice on how the Law is interperated to which he hid behind that old favourite "company policy"
Easier for you to take that view, your not the one who will be fked over by the HSE when some idiot hurts himself.
It's not the HSE that's the problem. People keep blaming the HSE, National Govt or the EU the problems where health and safety rules go too far are motivated by a corporate terror of being sued. Often the mad and bad rules are dictated by insurance companies.

Tannedbaldhead

2,952 posts

132 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
GG89 said:
The vast majority of HSE is utter utter bks.

Makes me even more thankful to be self employed.
If u carry public liability insurance you may find yourself to lot more health and safety requirements than you bargain for. Also, bear in mind, that legally speaking you carry the same responsibilities to the health and safety of those who suffer the consequences of your actions and inaction as you would as an employee acting on behalf of your employer.

santona1937

736 posts

130 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
To all those folks complaining about HSE. Will you sign a contract releasing you employer from ANY responsibility for any accident or injury that may occur to you at work? And agree that under no conditions will you make a claim for any such injury?



MajorProblem

4,700 posts

164 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
santona1937 said:
To all those folks complaining about HSE. Will you sign a contract releasing you employer from ANY responsibility for any accident or injury that may occur to you at work? And agree that under no conditions will you make a claim for any such injury?
Yes where do I sign?