RE: Elemental RP1: Driven

RE: Elemental RP1: Driven

Monday 5th June 2017

Elemental RP1: Driven

Finally, a full road drive in the Race Project 1



BAC Mono, Zenos E10 S, Ariel Atom, Radical SR3 SL... it feels like we've been here before. Another bonkers, British-built, lightweight, road-legal track day car. Will the effort die, or flourish?

Well, the Elemental RP1 feels a bit different, in every respect, which bodes well. For a start, there's the price point: from £82,250, excluding local taxes, or just shy of £100K if you pay the way most people do, i.e. legally. This outstretches the price tag of an Atom or the cost of a Zenos, or a similar cost for a power-hungry Caterham, but seems a more sensible pricing strategy: Elemental is forced to promise a lot more bang for the buck, which, if the company grows and they manage to build in a race package around the car, which is the ultimate aim, is then a brand worth buying into properly for the long haul. Look at Radical: it can work.


Plus, you don't get a USB charging point and reversing camera in most of the competition. But more of the creature comforts shortly...

The people behind the car also bear noting: a six-man team from McLaren F1, Toyota F1, Porsche and Airbus make up the expert knowledge. They've just completed the main development programme (we drove a prototype back in 2015) and delivered the first real, bona fide customer car in March.

So, what's the fuss about? At first glance, the car looks a bit KTM X-Bow-ish, or Vuhl 05-ish, with a wide stance, slabs of crazy bodywork and triple headlights. And true to form, there's a carbon fibre tub, like so many that have gone before. But, er, that's about all the RP1 (short for Race Programme 1) has in common with pretty much anything else.


Make yourself comfortable
Climb aboard, and the two carbon seats are tipped back in the feet-up position, a first for a production car. Wise move: lower yourself into the driver's seat and your heart's thumping before you even fire the red button with the drama of it. The RP1 also gets an immediate gold star for the length of the seat runners: I'm 5ft 6in and there was plenty of scope to fully depress the clutch pedal; then one of the founders got in, all 6ft 5in of him, and was equally at home. You couldn't say that about a Caterham 7, for example.

The car we drove was minus a windscreen but every customer so far has specified one and they're coming. It wasn't so bad with sunglasses on at speed, but without a rear view mirror you can't see jack; those striking wing mirrors give as much visibility as motorcycle ones.

Power comes from Ford's 2.0-litre turbocharged Ecoboost engine, delivering 325hp and giving this 595kg car a power-to-weight ratio of 548hp per tonne, and 0-60mph time of 2.7 seconds. 

The astonishing part of the powertrain, however, is the six-speed sequential Hewland JFR gearbox with pneumatic shifters. Genius, and so obvious. Why go for a manual 'box and clutch when you can have such astonishing, visceral, aggressive performance from this set-up?


Starter's orders
Push the start button, and be careful to slip the clutch and keep the revs coming as you trickle away: there's an ultra-light flywheel which makes stalling the engine eminently possible if you're not paying attention. However, once on the racketing, teeth-chattering, cheek-blasting move, upchanges can be accomplished via the right-hand paddle with the throttle to the floor. And in 40 milliseconds. Downchanges require a lift, but that's to be expected. The power delivery is barely interrupted, a surge of assaults on the air in front of you that fairly take your breath away. Good news, then, that the Alcon brakes are phenomenal.

The downforce helps, too. Integrated underfloor dynamics - front and rear diffusers - generate more than 400kg of downforce at 150mph (it's good for 170mph once you've tweaked a few things onboard). This is A Good Thing for track work, but you'd have to be a braver and better driver than I to find the performance envelope of this thing: it's just too brutal and too accomplished for novice circuit goers. 


Should you be a more advanced track tearaway than I, however, you'll enjoy the five drive modes, all accessible from the central switchboard. Once the engine oil is over 50 degrees, you can change the mapping to give you more power (it ranges from 243hp to 325hp) and less traction. Lift the bonnet, and you can quite easily adjust the Nitron damper settings by just rotating the tops through individual clicks.

On the road, however, a bizarre thing happens: the RP1 is positively comfy. In large part this is due to mounting the engine longitudinally, creating more room for longer wishbones. It soaks up undulations and broken road surfaces, and you could go far in one. With a long weekend away in mind, the engineers have scooped out two 100-litre storage bins under the rear deck, one in front of each rear wheel.

Other creature comforts are the aforementioned USB charging point, reversing camera and even heated footwells. Oh, and there's a digital screen behind the steering wheel that shows speed, revs and other data, but also displayed my name when I got in. I'm a sucker for that sort of stuff. Where do I sign?


ELEMENTAL RP1
Engine:
1,995cc 4-cyl turbocharged Ford Ecoboost
Transmission: 6-speed sequential Hewland JFR, rear-wheel drive
Power (bhp): 325@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 335@3,000rpm
0-60mph: 2.7sec
Top speed: 170mph
Weight: 595kg
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Price: £98,700

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

Krikkit

Original Poster:

26,527 posts

181 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
So this is effectively a more practical BAC Mono then? Same Hewland sequential, similar starter engine, similar weight.

Sounds like a very impressive machine, 200 ltrs of luggage space is rather luxurious for this type of car as well!

phil4

1,216 posts

238 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Saw one of these at a recent track-day, appeared just as the track closed for lunch, and proceeded to zip round with the track to itself.

Looked very striking (in green), sounded good, and looked reasonably quick, though really hard to tell.

It didn't end well though, not well at all. Which was a shame.

gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Doesn't the LaFerrari have a feet up driving position?

Macboy

739 posts

205 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
gigglebug said:
Doesn't the LaFerrari have a feet up driving position?

Nope.

numtumfutunch

4,723 posts

138 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
phil4 said:
It didn't end well though, not well at all. Which was a shame.
And?

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Way too much money, boring engine choice but the car is extremely beautiful to look at.

phil4

1,216 posts

238 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
numtumfutunch said:
And?
As in, what occured?

It stopped opposite side of the track from us. Big clouds of smoke or steam came from where it was. fire engine arrived. Car was taken away, under a cover, on the back of a trailer towed by an Elemental branded van.

I was too far away to be 100% certain as to what occurred, but I know what I'd put my money on.

brushwood69

19 posts

110 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
£4,850.00 For a windscreen option............. +VAT weeping

bobbo89

5,216 posts

145 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
They're options list is awesome!

£1800 for a race suit, boots and gloves!
or, £30 for passenger goggles!!!!

DeanHelix

135 posts

155 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Seems expensive for what it is. If Zenos couldn't make it work selling cars for 1/3 of that price, you've got to wonder how long these guys will stay in business.

gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Macboy said:

Nope.
Could have sworn they were able to make the LaFerrari lower than previous models due to the fixed laid back driving position?

j90gta

563 posts

134 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
DeanHelix said:
Seems expensive for what it is. If Zenos couldn't make it work selling cars for 1/3 of that price, you've got to wonder how long these guys will stay in business.
What is the actual market for cars of this type and how many manufacturers can it sustain? No matter how it looks and goes, seems ridiculously expensive. £100K buys a lot of road car and a separate track car without the compromises required for a car that needs to be able to do both.

Kawasicki

13,084 posts

235 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Macboy said:
gigglebug said:
Doesn't the LaFerrari have a feet up driving position?

Nope.
Hmmm...


gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Well it's not far off a feet up position then!

The paint job makes it look like one of those Rinspeed extendible cars, or one of my sons old toy cars which I now can't find to take a picture of.

The fact you can buy a multi car garage for the same price as this kinda misses the point as I can't see many, if any, having one of these as an only car in the first place. The fact it adds some practicality will just be a bonus for some, the ability to take overnight luggage or merely be able to carry a passenger and a good amount of shopping etc at the same time will add to its appeal over the competition?

Edited by gigglebug on Monday 5th June 14:31

xjay1337

15,966 posts

118 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
I think it looks awesome, but needs a windscreen, not at £5k.
The luggage capacity is great. Going to a far away trackday it's nice to not have to put your stuff in a ruck sack in the passenger seat.

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
Sorry how much?

If you're in this market it's hard not to buy a Lotus Exige...

comfortably numb

50 posts

143 months

Monday 5th June 2017
quotequote all
The 311 is a better comparison. And that one with a sequential box is over £120k (race version, not road legal) and much heavier.

rusti

29 posts

250 months

Tuesday 6th June 2017
quotequote all
I trust Steve Sutcliffe's verdict. This might be a brilliant car.
Just think about the purity of the concept. 400kg downforce achieved without wings meets about 600kg weight.

Vee12V

1,334 posts

160 months

Tuesday 6th June 2017
quotequote all
Lots to like except for the engine perhaps.

Robert-nszl1

401 posts

88 months

Tuesday 6th June 2017
quotequote all
Vee12V said:
Lots to like except for the engine perhaps.
Yes I thought that.

And even with a windscreen, not having a roof makes it a pretty full on touring proposition!