2018 Volvo V40 T5 | UK Review
Polestar's future is in hybrid GTs but its present includes Polestar Performance Parts; are they any good?
Fear not - the Volvo V40 T5 has not snuck under your radar as a left-field Golf R smasher or a Civic Type R slayer for more mature tastes. Would have been nice, wouldn't it? It has its merits, of which we'll discuss in a second, but there's absolutely no way this car will be featuring on a regular hot hatch buyer's shortlist - and with the full host of Polestar Performance Parts, only the most dedicated Volvo fans will consider it.
Why? 253hp and £42,665, to put it bluntly, which makes the car tremendously uncompetitive. Paying so much for that level of performance feels like a Premier League team swapping their eleven for an under-15 side. And then paying them more. Don't forget too that the venerable V40 is a car that didn't feel amazing in isolation four years ago. But we like a fast Volvo here on PH, and it should be noted that this particular car appears to have every single option thrown at it, right down to the 'flexible load floor with grocery bag holder' (for £100) - so it's hardly a representative spec. Perhaps a more pertinent question to ask is whether any of the Polestar Performance Parts are worth having; we know its complete cars have a distinct appeal, and that it has grand plans for the future, but what about the gubbins you can add to a regular Volvo now? Can the 100,000 customers who've already had their cars Polestared be wrong?
Er, perhaps. Like the V60 Polestar, the flagship V40 has surrendered its interesting engine - in this case the old five-cylinder 2.5 - for a seemingly more ordinary 2.0-litre with just the four combustion chambers. And while it revs keenly enough and feels to have made the front end less leaden, it still isn't fantastically memorable. As for the Polestar bit, it adds 8hp for £1,835 through an exhaust, intake and remap (you get the latter for free with the full package) but even someone who weighs money rather than counts it might question the value of that. Fortunately the gearbox calibration is slick, meaning that, while not rabidly fast, the V40 can be nudged along at a brisk enough pace.
It's a Polestar lite, Diet Polestar, low sugar Polestar...
The chassis mods are far more interesting and worthwhile. First off, would you look at those wheels? Or them rims, as someone trying to be cool might say. Oh sure, £2,325 makes them quite pricey - you're noticing the theme here, hopefully - but once you've seen them on a Bursting Blue (that's another £800) V40 it would be very hard to resist. They probably don't save a huge amount of weight, kerbing would feel tantamount to self-harm and they'd be a nightmare a clean, yet they would be the first thing I'd pick. For an old stager in the segment this V40 still looks mighty fine.
You'll have to remind yourself of the cost of good looks, in every sense, when first mooching around in the Polestar. Those gorgeous wheels, combined with the Polestar springs and dampers, do give it a tangible abruptness at low speed. If you were feeling kind you'd call the damping purposeful, and certainly it's very well done, but heck is it firm.
At high speed everything starts to make a lot more sense. (Yeah, helpful in Britain, we know.) However where the previous, standard five-cylinder T5 would lurch and heave its way around, this car is significantly improved. There's now a real assurance in the way it shrugs off road imperfections that was lacking before. There's an increased willingness to change direction as well, a precision and eagerness hitherto absent in the V40. Some standard P Zeros will surely have helped, too.
It's improved, yes, but not transformed
What a shame then that the rest of the car isn't quite at the level. Even more so than in the V60, there seems to be an obvious mismatch between powertrain and chassis. The way it goes down a road makes it feel like a car of considerably greater focus, which then make the traction deficiencies - this car lacks a limited-slip diff, or any electronics pretending to be one - and the fact that it simply isn't all that fast, seem all the more irksome. Elements of it feel like a pretty serious performance car, while other parts feel like, well, a stock 2.0-litre Volvo V40.
There remains a good deal to like about the Volvo hatch - yet there's no mistaking its age or the fact that in the extraordinarily competitive hot hatch market, it's clearly out of its depth. Signs of Polestar's promise do shine through. Nevertheless what the standalone brand needs is not only a better base product but a broader remit, too. Constrained to aftermarket fiddling, as it is here, the result is confused and frustrating. With increased scope there's little doubt that Polestar could deliver on a new brief, which is heartening when you consider the former tuner's expansive new future as a fully-fledged division. The V40 feels very much like the past; the future though ought to be a much brighter shade of blue.
SPECIFICATION - VOLVO V40 WITH POLESTAR PERFORMANCE PARTS
Engine: 1,969cc, 4-cyl turbocharged
Transmission: 8-speed auto, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 253@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295@2,000-3,500rpm
0-62mph: 6.2sec
Top speed: 149mph
Weight: 1,447kg
MPG: 47.9 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 137g/km
Price: £32,015 (£42,665 as tested comprising £4,725 for Complete Polestar Performance Pack (including software optimisation, Intake and Exhaust Pack, 19-inch Polestar Lightweight alloy wheels, stainless steel exhaust system, Tech Matt Black rear diffuser, sports air filter and Polestar branded cover, Chassis Pack of Polestar, Blue sport springs and Polestar dampers plus Interior and Exterior Styling Pack of sports pedals, gearknob with Polestar branded emblem, glossy black door mirror covers, door sills and roof spoiler), £1,900 for IntelliSafe Pro (including Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake, Pedestrian and Cyclist Detection, Adaptive Cruise Control, Distance Alert, Queue Assist, Lane Keeping Aid, Driver Alert Control, Active high Beam, Road Sign Information Display and Blind Spot information System with Cross Traffic Alert), £775 for Winter Plus (including active LED headlights, heated front seats, heated front screen, headlight cleaning system, rain-sensing wipers, rear reading, theatre and front door side step illumination, illuminated gear knob), £500 for Sensus Connect with Premium Sound by Harman Kardon, £450 for Volvo On Call with app, £375 for rear park assist camera, £100 for flexible load floor with grocery bag holder, £550 for Keyless Drive with personal car communicator, £150 for frameless auto dimming rear mirror, £150 for gearshift paddles, £150 for Tempa spare wheel and jack plus £825 for Bursting Blue premium metallic paint)
Can we take a second to appreciate these wheels?
 |
 |
 |
 |
Is it because you don't like it therefore it must be rubbish?
Look at what Hyundai have achieved with its new N, then look at this. Then factor in the Volvo is massively more expensive.
Sorry, its a total joke. If they sell one to an actual customer I would be amazed.
The sad thing is that during the Ford era Volvo had some storming engines (5 pot HPT and LPT turbos, great sounding 5 pot diesels, NASP and turbo I6s, compact V8s) in what you could generously described as "unevenly competent" cars, and now they have gorgeous cars with engines even a mother couldn't feel any affection for.
I'm coming to the end of three years with a D4 R Design, and whilst I thought that was great value compared to a 1 series or A3, this is just too much. The D4 isn't far behind in performance either. Mines even done a track day and was surprisingly capable.
Not the most reliable car I've ever had either, I've had older Volvos that were tanks, but not this.
I still think they look great though, shame there is no 3 door.
I may be alone in this but to me it looks a pudding, and the performance doesn’t make me want to go out and buy one.
Volvos mojo seems to have gone in my opinion....
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff