RE: McLaren 720S Spider: Driven

RE: McLaren 720S Spider: Driven

Thursday 28th February

McLaren 720S Spider: Driven

February, you say? Raining and cold in America? Perfect time for a new convertible supercar!



Never underestimate the importance of a drop-top supercar to McLaren Automotive. While first thoughts of Woking's wonders may turn to focussed coupes like the P1 and 675LT, the range of Spiders has accounted for very nearly a third of the cars which have left McLaren showrooms since the 12C's introduction in 2012. For this year, the expectation is that convertibles will make up 50 per cent of sales, this new 720S Spider joining the 570S and 600LT in the range to broaden the offering. Don't be surprised if one day convertibles are the majority, either, given how close the roadsters tend to be to their coupe counterparts dynamically while also adding that dash of cabrio glamour.

Point being that the introduction of the second generation Super Series Spider is a very big deal for McLaren. The 720S is described as possessing the 'core supercar DNA' of the brand, with the ambition being for this Spider to create the 'most complete convertible supercar', bringing together performance, usability and, interestingly, visibility for a compelling overall package. To that end the Coupe and Spider began development together, to ensure as many parallels between the pair as possible, before the standard 720S was prioritised for its earlier launch.

There's also a host of new technology to move it on from the old 650S and ensure its competitiveness against some extraordinary rivals - the Ferrari 488 GTB and Lamborghini Huracan Performante Spyder the two most notable. So instead of using the same Retractable Hardtop as seen in the Sports Series cars, this 720S has a new roof of fewer moving parts that's electrically rather than hydraulically operated, meaning it can be raised or lowered faster (11 seconds versus 17) and at a higher speed (31mph against 19mph) than in a 650S. This car also uses a new evolution of McLaren's carbon tub - now Monocage II-S, the first Monocage being used for the P1 - which is said to provide all the stiffness of that used in the coupe, while also keeping handy features like very slender A-pillars (don't forget about that visibility). Using carbon for the rollover protection system (instead of steel previously) has reduced both the size and weight, while also further helping rigidity.


Then it gets really clever. Patents have been registered by McLaren for both the synchronicity of the motors and the glazed rear buttresses, the former to improve speed and quietness of the roof mechanism (apparently half as loud as a 650S), the latter to aid over the shoulder visibility - a goal helped further by a lower rear deck and the smaller rollover protection. Everything has seemingly been designed to make getting around in this 200mph, mid-engined supercar as simple and stress-free as possible: the header rail has been moved 80mm forward, the doors open to narrower and lower maximums than a 650S, and there's even a recalibrated B&W sound system for the best top-down experience of your tunes. Seemingly nothing has been overlooked to make the 720S most accommodating convertible supercar around.

Could that make it a little too polished, though? After all, convertible supercars are typically bought in spite of a lack of practicality and usability, not because of it. Flair and drama surely weigh more heavily than comfort or visibility; if that weren't the case Lamborghini would have gone out of business a long time ago. Great though McLarens have so often been, that slightly juvenile sense of theatre to the cars as objects has arguably been lacking - and sorely missed in a market where it often accounts for so much.

That's no longer the case with the 720S. Oh sure, the design has been meticulously honed to deliver the best aerodynamic balance and heat management and, of course, visibility - this is still a Woking product, after all - but it's also a stunning thing to look at. That uncertainty that surrounded the coupe's design, from here at least, is gone, the Spider oozing supercar presence with just the right combination of stance, aggression and fine detailing. It treads a very fine line, appearing bold without being brash, showy but not silly and exciting yet not too extroverted - it's exactly what you would want from a flagship McLaren supercar, put simply. Look at a 12C Spider by comparison, and its relative awkwardness roof up or down against a 720S is clear.


Looks are subjective, though, for something more tangible it's worth reiterating just how little the Spider should lose to the Coupe thanks to that minimal 49kg weight gain. In fact, it's also worth pointing out that, by McLaren's favoured 'lightest dry weight' measurement, a 720S Spider is 38kg lighter than its 650S equivalent, not a car renowned for its paucity of power or excess weight. What that means is a power-to-weight ratio of 540hp per tonne, the ability to reach more than 200mph roof down and a 0-186mph time just a second behind the coupe - 22.4 seconds, in case you're interested.

So there's all that to be enthused by, the fantastic 720S to build on as a foundation and the promise of this Spider representing the broadest range of abilities of any McLaren... What a shame, then, that there was so little chance to test it. The launch route for the Spider was comprised almost entirely of State Trooper-patrolled Arizonan highway, mind-numbingly straight and with nothing capable of taxing a car as patently able as a £250k McLaren. Shame.

But next day there's a short photo route - we're saved. While the fear of a police presence never subsides, finally there are some corners, crests and undulations for the 720S to deal with. And, unsurprisingly, the Spider proves itself as capable, enjoyable and plain brilliant as the standard car - there really is no discernible difference. Only more noise, should you choose to have roof or rear window open. It remains a fluid, supple, involving sports car, only one with three times the power of a supercharged Lotus Elise. So as a driver you can revel in the control weights, the steering and visibility, or you can experience acceleration not far off what a P1 is capable of. Maybe try a combination of the two.


Pair those attributes with a cabin that really is extremely quiet, contributing to a real sense of peace and calm when the driving pace is less frantic, and the result is a car of huge depth and capability. It can be as approachable and easy-going, or as fast and ever-so-slightly furious, as the situation dictates. Put simply, all that makes the Coupe so good has most certainly survived the transition: the steering is lucid and quite lovely, in fact, perhaps the biggest dynamic advantage over its key rivals. Either it's that or the structural rigidity, this car shrugging off the very worst tarmac that could be found without any hint of shake, rattle or roll. 'Serenity' is what McLaren was said to be aiming for; odd goal though it may sound for a car of this remit, it's been achieved here.

Other points of note? A few. The electrochromic roof, despite adding £7,500 to the list price and a couple of extra kilos exactly where you don't want them, feels well worth having, making a light and airy cabin even more so. Seeing it fold away so seamlessly looks cool, as well. The V8 still doesn't sound awe inspiring. The V8 is also still fast enough to have you creating new swear words - but you knew that already.

On a fleeting first taste, then, the McLaren 720S Spider has met all expectations and even surpassed a few - it really is a supremely quiet and comfortable convertible experience when required, as well as every bit as exciting as you would hope a car with 720hp to be. We've every belief that it will only ramp up the exhilaration and raucousness on a more extended drive back home - hopefully that's some point soon.


SPECIFICATION - MCLAREN 720S SPIDER

Engine: 3,994cc, twin-turbo V8
Transmission: 7-speed SSG dual-clutch, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 720@7,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 568@5,500rpm
0-62mph: 2.9sec
Top speed: 212mph
Weight: 1,468kg (with fluids and 90 per cent full tank)
MPG: 23.2 (WLTP)
CO2: 276g/km (WLTP)
Price: £237,000 (as standard; 'Luxury' specification from £246,990, price as tested comprised of Elite Paint, Aztec Gold for £4,330, 10-spoke lightweight forged wheels for £3,170, Stealth wheel finish for £1,170, Exterior Carbon Fibre Pack 1 for £5,820, Exterior Carbon Fibre Pack 2 for £9,160, Stealth Pack for £1,200, Visible Carbon Fibre Monocage II-S for £4,110, Twin Exit Stainless Steel Sports Exhaust for £4,900, Gloss Finish Visual Carbon Fibre front air intakes for £2,290, Glazed electrochromic retractable hard top roof for £7,500, Carbon Fibre Primary Interior Components for £2,290, Carbon Fibre Secondary Interior Components for £2,290, Carbon Fibre Seat Backs for £3,280, Power Adjusted Steering Column for £1,420, Satin Finish Visual Carbon Fibre Sill Trim Finisher for £2,700, Bowers & Wilkins 12-speaker Audio System for £3,640. McLaren Track Telemetry for £3,580, 360-degreee Park Assist for £4,720 and MSO Defined Satin Finish Visual Carbon Fibre Extended Gear Shift Paddles for £1,980)










Author
Discussion

edo111s

Original Poster:

173 posts

164 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Want!!
It's not very clear what is the price-as-tested, though. Is it 237k or 247k, before adding the trivial 70k of listed options ?

swisstoni

7,459 posts

218 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
edo111s said:
Want!!
It's not very clear what is the price-as-tested, though. Is it 237k or 247k, before adding the trivial 70k of listed options ?
I’ve got a feeling it’s £247 + £70k which the writer couldn’t bring themselves to say. hehe

Bencolem

459 posts

178 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
That gold is a stunning color for the car. Frightening that there are £70k of options though.

Robert-nszl1

347 posts

27 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
A really striking looking car, which on most objective measures is better than the Ferrari/ Lambo competition. I'm surprised they can't dial in a sexier exhaust note, recognising the limitations of turbo charging. Seems to be the element that would most easily engender a bit more passion/ drama into the package.

Certainly some ambitiously priced options, though I imagine most people can do without quite a lot of the carbon detailing. I look forward to the nearly new cars that will appear at sub £200k prices....

easytiger123

1,626 posts

148 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Robert-nszl1 said:
A really striking looking car, which on most objective measures is better than the Ferrari/ Lambo competition.
You are right...and yet I have never seen a supercar I want less than a McLaren 720S in either coupe or spider variant.



Advertisement

Onehp

903 posts

222 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Some want drama, goosebumps, exhilaration, be overwhelmed with performance and be the center of attention... Even when queueing on a city highstreet.

Others want serenity, capability, usability, visibility, steering feel, resolvedness and controlled performance if only just...

Gameface

7,562 posts

16 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Aiming for serenity?

That's the last thing I want from my convertible supercar.


British Beef

1,156 posts

104 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all

Stunning, as an every day usable super car, that can do comfort and race car, convertible and coupe, and look as striking as anything wearing a bull or prancing horse, I think this has nailed it!!!!

Stainless steel sports exhaust £4900

Jesus, how much would the titanium sports exhaust cost then?

sege

190 posts

161 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Oh no! The whole thing is ruined! Those headlight surrounds (while aerodynamically very effective) are way too aesthetically challenging!
It's lucky I don't have £237,000 (plus extras) because no way would I buy one!!!!

Did this comment make the internet worthwhile today?
Also, did I mention how much I like/dislike the colour?

leglessAlex

2,973 posts

80 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
I normally roll my eyes when looking at the options that have been added to press cars, but there are quite a few on that list that I'd probably want on my car, I reckon I could add £25k of options and yet not have added anything bling-y/unnecessary.


I think it looks great, and a lot better than the coupe. No idea why that could be, but I even find the eye sockets on the front less jarring now.

Sandpit Steve

124 posts

13 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
edo111s said:
Want!!
It's not very clear what is the price-as-tested, though. Is it 237k or 247k, before adding the trivial 70k of listed options ?
Yes, that’s a £320k car as tested redface

More than half the options are carbon panels of one sort or another, which might look lovely but are going to depreciate almost to zero the minute it drives off the dealer’s forecourt.

Looks stunning though, and undoubtedly the best performing car in its class. I’ll have the blue one please.

WJNB

1,516 posts

100 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Bit too wide to be practical in the UK apart from on motorways & posing in High streets.
I wonder if the opacity of the glass roof can be changed to suit very hot climes as per the options on the Mercedes SLC/SL.
In fact is this car not a modern junior lightweight version of the old V8 SLK that CAN have a tinted glass roof that can be made darker/lighter?
Does one REALLY have to spend so much money on a fast open sports car?
Very few if any drivers have the ability or access to a location to fully exploit it.

Gameface

7,562 posts

16 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
WJNB said:
In fact is this car not a modern junior lightweight version of the old V8 SLK that CAN have a tinted glass roof that can be made darker/lighter?
Yeah good spot. They are identical. rofl

mikey k

12,127 posts

155 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Bencolem said:
That gold is a stunning color for the car. Frightening that there are £70k of options though.
There isn't, they quoted it all wrong
Its a £247k luxury spec car, they have then listed the options over a standard car that have been added. Very few of those are options over and above the Luxury spec package.

Really looking forward to driving one of these and comparing it to my 675LT spider cool

spikyone

285 posts

39 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
WJNB said:
Bit too wide to be practical in the UK apart from on motorways & posing in High streets.
I wonder if the opacity of the glass roof can be changed to suit very hot climes as per the options on the Mercedes SLC/SL.
In fact is this car not a modern junior lightweight version of the old V8 SLK that CAN have a tinted glass roof that can be made darker/lighter?
Does one REALLY have to spend so much money on a fast open sports car?
Very few if any drivers have the ability or access to a location to fully exploit it.
I can see that argument with the German uber-saloons, which seem unnecessarily powerful to compensate for their equally unnecessary size and weight, but it doesn't play so well with a supercar. It's reasonable to expect owners of this type of car to take them to a track at some point (there was a 458 Speciale at Silverstone last week).

The 720S looks better every time I see it, and in the right colour is just jaw-dropping. The Spider in the photos is absolutely the right colour. cloud9 Given a big enough lottery win, I'd be heading straight to the nearest McLaren dealership.

mikey k

12,127 posts

155 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
WJNB said:
Bit too wide to be practical in the UK apart from on motorways & posing in High streets.
I wonder if the opacity of the glass roof can be changed to suit very hot climes as per the options on the Mercedes SLC/SL.
In fact is this car not a modern junior lightweight version of the old V8 SLK that CAN have a tinted glass roof that can be made darker/lighter?
Does one REALLY have to spend so much money on a fast open sports car?
Very few if any drivers have the ability or access to a location to fully exploit it.
Nope
Its no wider than a 650 or 675 and a lot narrower than an Aventador
Never had any issues with width clearance in 25k miles of driving mine.
The roof opacity cannot be changed, they missed a trick there, especially as they offer it on the 570GT
With regard to using these, you are correct about top speeds, around B roads it a great car and perfect for passing dawdlers.

Pumpsmynads

85 posts

95 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
A shame the photos aren’t higher resolution.


Ex Boy Racer

1,055 posts

131 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Bencolem said:
That gold is a stunning color for the car. Frightening that there are £70k of options though.
There isn't, they quoted it all wrong
Its a £247k luxury spec car, they have then listed the options over a standard car that have been added. Very few of those are options over and above the Luxury spec package.

Really looking forward to driving one of these and comparing it to my 675LT spider cool
So, that car, as tested, would be £247K? I would like to know for sure

Sandpit Steve

124 posts

13 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
Ex Boy Racer said:
mikey k said:
Bencolem said:
That gold is a stunning color for the car. Frightening that there are £70k of options though.
There isn't, they quoted it all wrong
Its a £247k luxury spec car, they have then listed the options over a standard car that have been added. Very few of those are options over and above the Luxury spec package.

Really looking forward to driving one of these and comparing it to my 675LT spider cool
So, that car, as tested, would be £247K? I would like to know for sure
Top Gear reviewed the blue one, and said the list price as tested was £321,900.
https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/mclaren/720s-s... (Bottom of the Overview page).

isaldiri

4,374 posts

107 months

Wednesday 27th February
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Nope
Its no wider than a 650 or 675 and a lot narrower than an Aventador
Never had any issues with width clearance in 25k miles of driving mine.
The 720 definitely is a wider car than the already quite wide 650/675.