RE: Bentley Arnage Red Label | The Brave Pill

RE: Bentley Arnage Red Label | The Brave Pill

Saturday 25th January 2020

Bentley Arnage Red Label | The Brave Pill

The car that saved the 6.75-litre V8 from early retirement, but will running it delay yours too?



The alligator stopped evolving about eight million years ago, having parked itself on predator apex and achieved the ability to eat anything that took its fancy. Much the same could be said for Bentley's venerable pushrod 6.75-litre V8, a powerplant that has lived nearly as long in car terms. The first use of the L-Series was as long ago as 1959 and, although it has gained turbochargers and increasingly boosty power outputs through seven decades of production, the version fitted to the soon-to-retire Mulsanne is still more similar to the original than it is different. That's the sort of innings that should win a standing ovation on the way back to the pavilion.

But while the nostalgic and deep-pocketed can celebrate the V8's long life with the hugely expensive Mulsanne 6.75 Edition by Mulliner, this week's Pill is offering a much cheaper way to experience the considerable charms of this almighty powerplant, in the form of the car that saved it from a much earlier bath. Granted, there are more risks in a £14,000 Arnage Red Label than a Mulsanne with a full manufacturer warranty. But anyone trying to make an either-or decision between the pair can regard the quarter million difference in price as a healthy contingency fund.

The Mulsanne has aged particularly well, probably because it was never very modern in the first place, and holds the almost unique distinction of having been made deliberately more old-fashioned soon after launch. Introduced in 1998 it was intended to be a new chapter for Bentley, featuring not only a more curvaceous design than the styled-by-ruler Brooklands/Turbo R that preceded it, but also an entirely new powerplant for the 21st century: a twin-turbocharged 4.4-litre BMW M62. This featured such modern innovations as overhead camshafts and 32 Valves, and even dispatched drive through a five-speed autobox. It was, the company proudly boasted, a huge step forwards compared to the already ancient L-Series.


Potential buyers disagreed strongly, with many reckoning the Bavarian unit lacked torque, character and - worst of all - the kind of breeding that the sort of chaps who said "chap" a lot expected their Bentleys to have. Early Arnage sales were disappointing and, in a move that was tied up with VW's acquisition of Bentley and BMW's purchase of Rolls, the decision was taken to bring the L-Series back. Something made possible because tiny numbers were still being produced for the Continental R Coupe.

After enough work had been done to get it through emissions tests, the pushrod V8 was relaunched in the Arnage Red Label in late 1999 - the BMW V8 continuing as the girly Green Label, which pretty much nobody bought from that point onwards. The Red Label was true alligator: much less advanced, but also much more awesome. The new-old engine made 400hp, but accompanied this with a truly ridiculous 616lb-ft of torque, a quantity that strained both the allegorical imaginations of reviewers trying to find things to compare it to - no stump was left unpulled - as well as the ability of any transmission to digest it. So the snazzy new five-speed 'box was ditched as well, replaced by the Turbo R's four-speed GM auto.


The Red Label was short on technical sophistication in much the same way that a sledgehammer is. The pushrod V8 was a stonking 270kg heavier than the all-alloy BMW unit, which had an obvious effect on the already not-especially sharp handling. But caveman thrills were still considerable, the huge performance delivered without much effort. Peak torque arrived at just 2,200rpm, and maximum power was at a barely sweating 4,000rpm. For perspective the short-lived Bentayga Diesel produced similar figures, but actually revved higher. The Arnage had performance to shorten straights in fine style, although corners were more of a challenge given the Newtonian forces involved in persuading the Red Label's 2.6-tonne mass to change direction.

It was also good at attracting attention. In 2001 I had been dispatched to Le Mans to do a story about Bentley's return to the 24 Hour race. The idea was to do an interview with works driver Andy Wallace - then, as now, one of the nicest blokes to ever pedal a racecar - who would lap the circuit (slowly) in a Red Label while talking about the considerably greater challenge of piloting the EXP Speed 8 around at 200mph plus. All went well until the photographer suggested we divert to take a few pictures outside the bars in Arnage which, on the Friday before the race, were already filled with well-lubricated fans. The sight of the Arnage drew a crowd, and the realisation it was being piloted by a factory driver in his overalls created a loud, inebriated mob - which wouldn't move out of the way until it had been shown something spectacular. Wallace obliged with a 616lb-ft burnout that was loud and smoky enough to attract police attention and a very stern telling off in French.


Few Arnage owners are likely to stoop to such childish antics, but the car's gentleman thug image has always seen it appeal to a mixed demographic. Some Red Labels have been cherished like family heirlooms and pretty much laid down in the wine cellar, getting everything they need the moment they require it. Others have been run on far tighter budgets by those keener to project an image than pay for it. You definitely want to be buying a car from the first of these groups, as the costs of getting a poorly maintained Arnage back into fettle are scarier than watching Das Boot on a leaky submarine with the lights out. Servicing is punishingly expensive, with even the basic 10,000-miler likely to be north of £700 from a specialist, with the full 60,000-mile "D" service involving brake lines and hydraulic hoses and a two grand invoice. On top of that, the Arnage has a predictable appetite for both tyres and brake components, with new front discs and pads running to around £1,000. Oh, then there's 12mpg, don't forget about that.

The dealer selling our Pill boasts it has a "full and documented" service history with nine stamps in the book and, barring condensation inside the near-side headlight glass, it looks to be in good fettle - with the proviso (to save the need to squint at the pictures) that at least one of the tyres is of the budget persuasion. Rear privacy glass won't be for all, but is presumably a removable tint, and the magnolia hide and walnut interior enticingly fresh in the pictures. The published MOT history suggests both continuous, steady use - a very good sign for a car like this - but also what seems to have been an electrical strike that lead to a test failure with non-functioning headlights back in August. It went on to pass, but after a seven week gap that suggests the issue was a non-trivial one. Yet beyond that, there's nothing in the record to give pause to the sort of stout-hearted adventurers who will be attracted to a car like this.

Cheaper examples of the Arnage are also looking like enticing value at the moment, even with the considerable risk of further expense factored in: asking prices are getting close to overlapping with those of the much less sophisticated Turbo R and are still well under the entry point for even the leggiest examples of the W12 Continental and Flying Spur. The 6.75-litre V8 is one of those engines likely to be remembered in reverential awe as the world turns green and sensible, and an Arnage Red Label is likely to remain one of the best ways to experience its considerable charms.


See the original advert here

Search for a Bentley here

Author
Discussion

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,014 posts

144 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
That’s a return to Brave Pill form.

Edited by Billy_Whizzzz on Saturday 25th January 06:34

Zedboy

816 posts

212 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Gulp... even 12mpg might be optimistic on spirited days, but that dreadful window tint makes me wince at the mindset of the last owner. Blooming cracking motor chaps!

Sumsion

277 posts

173 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Tempted but just bought a VW Polo for the same money .....

Schermerhorn

4,343 posts

190 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
How much does the original 6.75L V8 have in common with the last iteration of the 6.75L engine?

Is this just some rose tinted romanticism being written about?

Roger Irrelevant

2,948 posts

114 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Zedboy said:
Gulp... even 12mpg might be optimistic on spirited days, but that dreadful window tint makes me wince at the mindset of the last owner. Blooming cracking motor chaps!
Yes with that window tint I can only presume they're the only person in the UK who is trying to make their Bentley look like a Chrysler 300c.

mike-v2tmf

779 posts

80 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
I want one of these to park next to the corvette ..........I'm such a chav

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Amazing how cobbled together the dash looks. Things have improved greatly in 20 years.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
I love it. If only there was a spare £14k down the back of the sofa.

MrC986

3,498 posts

192 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
I love it. If only there was a spare £14k down the back of the sofa.
Indeed. Plenty of road status for Ford Fiesta £s. A Bentley is one of my guilty pleasures to maybe try in a few years time- waaaafting down to Le Mans with friends in one would be great.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Exactly. Removable towbar and I could ditch the Rangey.

Then again, have to have both scratchchin

apm142001

276 posts

90 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Fantastic, this a proper Pill.

The Arnage is so much cooler than the Mulsanne too (although the author seems to have got the two mixed up at the start of paragraph 3 wink ).

The Mulsanne just seems to try and gain presence by being a big lump, whereas this is much more elegant and imposing somehow (whilst also still needing two parking spaces obviously).

can't remember

1,078 posts

129 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Schermerhorn said:
How much does the original 6.75L V8 have in common with the last iteration of the 6.75L engine?

Is this just some rose tinted romanticism being written about?
It's very much a case of Theseus’s ship. The 6.75 is one of the most romanticised engines ever, but it really is an absolute stormer in it's modern guise.

As for the car it really is a brave pill of the highest order. It's value may have dropped from being one of the worlds most expensive new cars but it's servicing and upkeep are still right up there. This one looks really good in silver and the interior is the spec I'd order if I could afford to. I'd suggest though that it's worth spending a bit more and getting a face-lift model with the twin headlights as the covered headlight model could be mistaken for a Rolls, and that would never do.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

129 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
I like the fact that PH posted this opposite an AMG E55 which was a readers car ... and the Bentley was the brave pill

biggrin


J4CKO

41,646 posts

201 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
How can an engine be over a quarter of a tonne heavier than a similar sized unit from another manufacturer ?

SCEtoAUX

4,119 posts

82 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Ugly beyond belief.

V8 FOU

2,977 posts

148 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
2:16 is how you do a smokey burnout in a Bentley!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usibuYxRucE&t=...

apm142001

276 posts

90 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
How can an engine be over a quarter of a tonne heavier than a similar sized unit from another manufacturer ?
Well...in terms of capacity it is half as big again as the M62. But I would assume most of the difference is that it’s iron rather than aluminium.

fph

63 posts

118 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
I was fortunate to drive one of these back to the West Country from Windsor a few years ago. Quite an experience and even at legal speeds down the M4 it drank fuel at an astronomical rate.

Not quite sure which ruler designed it though, Maybe George V in his spare time?

Fire99

9,844 posts

230 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
A wonderful ol bus! Love 'most' of the styling and the old-school dash. I'd reduce the tinting on the rear windows a touch. They're just a bit too 'limo' for something like an old regal brit!

This, in its old-school imperfection, is more Bentley than...........today's Bentleys.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
The revised twin turbo eights were of course developed for Bentley by Cosworth between 1997 and 1999

We ditched the old large,laggy and terrifically in-efficient single turbo (from the 420 bhp Turbo-R Continental (which never made 420 bhp but don't tell anyone) and swapped to a pair of closely coupled garret T2's. Unfortunately, these off-the-shelf units were not optimum, but they were all that was available at the time and within budget. Big change was the swap to the latest Bosch "torque based" engine management system, ME7, that transformed the driveability and response compaed to the cobbled-together-in-a-shed system used previously.

Early engines actually made around 475 bhp / 950 Nm, but had to be de-tuned (to 450 for the black label) to meet transmission limits and marketing requirements! One memorable test was a face to face "winner takes all" set of performance tests on track at Millbrook proving ground against Crews' own "in house" limited edition (mulliner park ward) twin turbo in the then current Conti-T, built for their pet famous Sultan (Sultan of Brunei) and claiming 550 bhp and 1000 Nm, where our car absolutely wiped the floor, recording 1.5 second quicker 0-62's and 5 second quicker 0-100 times! In fact, we were actually accused of cheating and of having run our car with a non-production calibration such was the difference in actual performance despite an on-paper deficit of around a 100 bhp / 100Nm!

Happy days!


the six and three quarters eight finally got the "right" turbo's about 4 years later when it got its final hardware revision which included a complex "cam in cam" system of varriable timing and cylinder de-act, which was done by the breakaway members of Cosworth who'd left to form their own engineering consultancy in late 1999 (Integral Powertrain) :-)