RE: Audi SQ8 | Driven

Thursday 10th October 2019

2020 Audi SQ8 | UK Review

The SQ8 repackages the SQ7's best bits for a coupe-like spin on the large, diesel-burning fast SUV



Yep, it's another SUV from Audi. But this one slots in right at the top of the range. As such, the new SQ8 is a 2.3-tonne SUV-coupe intended to take on BMW's upcoming M-fettled X6 M50d in the corners and still waft along well enough to see off the Range Rover Sport SDV8. To pull off both feats it gets an entire arsenal of whizz-bang tech, much of it centred around that turbocharged 4.0-litre V8 - which pumps out 664lb ft of torque - and the stabilisation wizardry enabled by anti-roll systems and active air suspension. If that all sounds familiar it's because much is shared with the SQ7 - although the SQ8 promises to add bespoke fine-tuning and a lower centre of gravity than its sibling. As Audi's present performance SUV flagship, outwardly it projects a more prominent sporting focus - no mean feat for the clever hardware or the engineers tuning it...

Any discussion of the merits of the large SUV-coupe is essentially moot. As ever, the SQ8's tapering roofline robs the cabin of some rear headroom and boot capacity - but a growing customer base is clearly happy to sacrifice both for the more aggressive body shape. Unlike the Porsche Cayenne Coupe, there's no notable weight penalty with the slicked-back roofline, so on-paper performance is unaffected, with the SQ8 taking 4.8 seconds to hit 62mph and topping out at an electronically limited 155mph. But engineers claim that the SQ8 has a genuine handling advantage over the SQ7 thanks to its shorter maximum height and lower tail, allowing for unique chassis tuning underneath.

Inside, all SQ8s come as standard with Audi's very latest Virtual Cockpit suite, including the two centre console screens and digital instrument cluster, which take some getting used to but they do eventually become intuitive and easy to use once you're up to speed - and they remain as visually impressive as ever. Up front, the cabin feels big and airy, helped in part by supportive bolsters and a great seating position, which uses the wraparound effect of the high scuttle to deliver something which feels close to sporty. The SQ8 is big, but as a result of the great adjustability offered by its controls, you feel comfortable with the dimensions in seconds. So long as you're not too bothered about visibility directly behind - you're provided with a narrow view through the angled tailgate - the SQ8 shrinks around you.


Audi's 4.0-litre turbodiesel unit produces a peak of 435hp from 3,750rpm to the 5,000rpm redline, but it's the 664lb ft of torque that kicks in from 1,000rpm that matters most. You might expect a muscular unit like this to offer the elasticity of the old (and greatly missed) V12 TDI, but for some reason there's a noticeable step in performance at about 2,000rpm. When you're driving around town it feels like the eight-speed tiptronic is to blame for the hesitation, while on the open road it seems as though the motor itself needs a second to inhale before letting loose. Odd, given there's 48v mild-hybrid and electric turbine tech onboard - although once moving there's no denying the SQ8's potency. It surges forward like a juggernaut, acceleration both linear and unyielding, so pace piles on quicker than you think.

Keep to the inside lane of a motorway and the SQ8's composure and refinement is really very impressive, its lane assist tech set to on by default (you can switch it off) and adaptive cruise system being ultra-smooth during both throttle and brake applications. On standard-fit 22-inch wheels it doesn't exactly waft, but there's no question the SQ8 would take you hundreds of miles without you really noticing. Only the occasionally jiggle of quicker suspension settings leaves the softer Range Rover Sport with a slight advantage - but on the flip side, the SQ8 feels like its made to deliver total confidence at 155mph. Which, of course, it is.


Switch from comfort to dynamic mode (Audi's latest Virtual Cockpit layout locates the Dynamic Select controls onto the haptic feedback central screen) and there's a noticeable stiffening of the air suspension's rebound rates. The car remains remarkably good at gliding over large bumps, but smaller, sharper imperfections make for a busy ride - one that within a couple of corners of our country route has us winding the chassis back to comfort mode. It's a mark of Audi's anti-roll hardware, shared with Cayenne and Bentayga no less, that even this softer setting results in next to no body roll through the bends. The SQ8 body corners flat while the wheels below pitter patter over bumps and cracks on their own, leaving you to lean on the surges of torque and try your damn hardest to break the traction of the 285-width boots. You won't.

Only fallen leaves flummoxed the car in PH's experience, a circumstance which saw the SQ8's tail give first - not as part of some hidden mid-corner adjustability, as offered by the Cayenne Coupe Turbo - but simply because the nose is so utterly dominant in the model's chassis balance. The brakes are similarly undefeatable at pace, making the SQ8 about as securely adhered to the road surface as any large SUV, which, as ever, is both technically impressive and vaguely soporific. Audi's sport differential is standard-fit here but with such hefty reserves of grip it's mostly there just to provide more unrelenting drive out of every type of corner. Add in a steering system that's quick to respond but void of communication, and an air-bed chassis certainly not concerned with driver feedback and, well, you know what you're getting.

Most SQ8 buyers certainly will, and they will regard the forfeiture of immersive handling as no more serious than the sacrifice of rear headroom. Probably less so given the straight-line performance that is undeniably on offer here, and the nonchalant way the SQ8 can be driven quickly. It fails to trump the Range Rover for comfort or for a sense of connectedness with the control surfaces, but it often feels like more of a high-grade technical accomplishment. Which is familiar trait for very ecomplimentary as an objective appraisal gets. Ultimately, the SQ8 feels top-of-the-line. But that's it. We await the arrival of the RS Q8 and its Range Rover SVR-rivalling petrol V8 performance with interest. Perhaps that will be the red hot poker the SUV-coupe needs.


SPECIFICATION - AUDI SQ8

Engine: 3,956cc V8 twin-turbo diesel (with 48v mild hybrid hardware and electronic compressor)
Transmission: 8-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 435@3,750-5,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 664@1,000-3,250rpm
0-62mph: 4.8 seconds
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 2,365kg (unladen)
MPG: 31.4 (Vorsprung 30.7)
CO2: 205g/km
Price: £81,740 (£104,240 as tested for top Vorsprung trim level, plus options inc. £750 for Orca Black Metallic paint, £450 for red brake calipers with S logo, £400 for black roof rails, £475 for rear side airbags, £325 for tyre pressure monitoring system).

Search for an Audi Q8 here









Author
Discussion

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
What is the actual point of these things?

A BMW 530d is just as practical and better in every other regard at half the price.

That thing would be awful off-road and on those wide summer tyres likely to get stuck on mildly sloped wet grass. I think I’d be embarrassed to own one. Sorry, lease one.

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
Just in passing I own a L322 Rangerover V8 and a BMW 535d (and a modified GT86 for fun).

Both are RR and BMW are great at what they do. I just don’t see the point in compromising both for a price tag of six figures to get something not quite as good as either.


Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
I’m all for diversity but £100k on a car that’s highly compromised as an off-roader and highly compromised as a family car and highly compromised as a sporty drivers car just makes no sense to me. You could get a 7 seat Landrover Discovery which really is practical and good off road plus a BMW 530d Touring which is really premium and brilliant to drive and just as fast. Surely if you are in a position to drop six figures on a car you’re not living in a house with a pokey driveway for only one car?


Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
bigblock said:
That's why for me they make sense.

Today in my big fat planet killing Porsche Cayenne I picked up four colleagues and drove to a business meeting. Later in the day on one of my favourite roads I put it in sport mode and had some fun on my way home from work. I then put the dogs in the back and drove to the beach for a walk and in the evening hitched up the trailer and dropped off two tons of firewood for a friend at the end of a farm track. That's quite a versatile car and apparently it can also do the school run !
See that to my mind would be far better done in a 530d for the business trip getting 43mpg in whisper quiet comfort then on the back roads you’ve got a centre of gravity a foot lower, less tramline prone tyres and really rather good steering. For the smelly wet dogs, sand and towing duties what could beat a Discovery on winter tyres and without the smells of wet dog tomorrow morning on your way to work?

Plus you’ve got a spare car to leave down the pub, lend a friend or backup your other one malfunctioning or being in an accident etc.

£100k+ on a do everything car seems v odd to me unless you really do have only one parking space.

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Friday 11th October 2019
quotequote all
Err, the 530 Touring plus seven seat Disco is £100k of car - I’m not quibbling on the budget. I’ve got three cars, a motorbike and a lorry so am comfortably into £200k of motoring equipment. I could buy an SQ7 tomorrow my point is I’d feel daft because it’s such a compromised car. For the same money I could have two uncompromised cars covering a wider base and offering the flexibility of two cars.

Each to their own.

Oh and an Elise was out because I need two back seats for the school run and 911 or Evora were simply treble the money for more grip and more performance than was optimum to have fun. The Amp that goes to 11 is not always the best...

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Friday 11th October 2019
quotequote all
gigglebug said:
I am now finding it hard to take seriously the opinion of someone who is overly vocal about other folks choices of cars, and their intended use for them, and then freely admits that their own choice of a sports car had to take into account an ability to use it for the school run of all things, even though he already has two vehicles perfectly capable of covering that base.
I’m not overly vocal. I’m merely saying for that budget for one car you could have two that are objectively better at covering the competence map that the Audi is trying to.

My school run is a magnificent ten mile blast across a sinuous B Road. I very much enjoy doing it in my rather raucous GT86. It’s a nice little blast of petrolheadness. If I had a Cayman I’d be doing the school run in 5 series or RR and the sportscar would be in the garage. I like a fix of petrol several times a week so and I’m not much in the habit of going out in the evenings on made up drives in the car just for the heck of it - I grew out of that when I was about 21!

I don’t get why people get defensive. If the car works for you then great I’m happy for you but I just don’t see why sinking such a big budget in one car when you could get two that cover a wider talent spectrum makes sense. Perhaps I don’t get the image/status factor that goes with these things. Once you own aeroplanes you stop measuring status by cars.

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,380 posts

99 months

Friday 11th October 2019
quotequote all
Thinking about it I do actually know two people with Q7’s both work in the City for EY and despite mega wages live in disappointingly small houses with limited parking. So I can see the market - but how big is it for this sort of range topper? So they actually sell in any meaningful volume or is purely a halo car/brand statement exercise?