Alfa Romeo MiTo QV: Driven
Can the QV treatment be applied more successfully to MiTo than Giulietta?
Initial impressions are mostly encouraging. The optional Sabelt seats clench where they should and the steering wheel adjusts nicely. You're perched a little too high perhaps but it's a decent driving position. It at least helps stave off a glance toward the centre of the dash, where a sat-nav screen that's too small and dated ventilation controls draw the attention. Compared to the slick and contemporary Mini the MiTo feels a couple of generations behind.
But there are positives to note on the road. The turn in is quite keen, the MiTo feeling agile at corner entry. The ride doesn't feel dissimilar to the Fiesta's in fact, pretty stiff but without crashing too much.
But for a junior hot hatch, and an Italian one at that, the MiTo QV just isn't much fun. Attach whichever cliche desired about Alfa's dynamic prowess from the past and it simply doesn't apply to the latest Cloverleaf.
Often the appearance of a rather awkward looking Alfa Romeo (75, 146, SZ) could be overlooked thanks to an inspirational engine. Unfortunately for the MiTo even that isn't valid. The 1.4 MultiAir turbo is torquey enough but it can't compare with a Mountuned Fiesta ST for any-rev punch. Despite peak power being produced at 5,500rpm, there's little incentive to chase higher revs as doing so amplifies a fairly flat, uninspiring sound.
As in the Giulietta, the TCT dual clutch 'box in the QV is competent yet unremarkable. The shift speed is fine but what would be wrong with a little drama? It needn't be as outlandish as something like an A45 but using the gearbox for a little aural excitement wouldn't go amiss. A piercing beep whenever it decides a downchange is inappropriate compounds the impression of the MiTo being rather strait-laced.
The MiTo's innate balance is towards understeer, which it would be silly to criticise. But it's the car's obstinate refusal to do anything other than push straight on at the limit that makes it frustrating to drive hard. There's little willingness to tighten cornering line with a lift, leave alone any of the Fiesta's oversteer antics. A non switchable ESP would prevent any exploration of that anyway.
If anything the MiTo's staid nature is harder to excuse than in the Giulietta. That car will inherently be a little more mature, so why can't the smallest Alfa just have an edge too it? In a class that contains the hilariously engaging Fiesta and super talented Cooper S, the MiTo will struggle to compete. Indeed at more than £20,000 it ranks with the junior hot hatch also rans.
ALFA ROMEO MITO QUADRIFOGLIO VERDE
Engine: 1,368cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed TCT dual-clutch auto
Power (hp): 170@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 184@2,500rpm (Dynamic mode only, 170 in Normal/All Weather)
0-62mph: 7.3 seconds
Top speed: 136mph
Kerbweight: 1,170kg
MPG: 52.3mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 124g/km
Price: £20,210
I've got a Giulietta, primarily because it's a nice place to be and it's a daily driver, the other options in this segment didn't appeal to me. However, reliability is regretfully poor as is build quality. For the first time in 12 years I'm questioning whether my next car will be an Alfa sadly.
When I bought mine (used at 18 months old) new QV's were around £18,000 and MiTo's in general weren't flying out the showrooms, so I can't see this doing any better against more competition.
They're going to become a great bargain a year or so down the line, but that assumes people will buy new.
Fast enough - but uninspiring.
The Alfa character is small, light, sporting and delightful to drive, irrespective of power.
The 4C is wonderful but irrational. Most importantly it gives Alfa the benefit of the doubt, at least for a time. They now need to fulfil on that.
Mass market cars nowadays are generally ugly and turbocharged, because NCAP and emissions are more important to the majority than good looks and engine character. If they built a stunning looker with a powerful, revvy naturally aspirated engine, it would have a crap NCAP rating and high VED and BIK, so hardly anyone would buy it. So they build a safe hatchback with a 'me too' small capacity turbo engine, and everyone goes 'meh' and buys pretty much the same thing from a manufacturer with a better reliability and customer support history.
Poor Alfa. Damned if they do and damned if they don't quite honestly. I struggle to see where they go from here, and I speak as an Alfa owner.
I have a hankering after a Brera but, even though its so lovely to look at its absolutely disappointing to drive. I drove a 2.2 which barely moved and I hear the V6 not only doesn't feel much faster, it doesn't have that Busso sound track either and is all over fuel like a fat kid on a cup cake. It doesn't stack up anywhere except in the looks department.
I think they were closer to hitting the nail on the head when they put the 1750 tbi motor in it, but shortly after they then stopped making it!
They need to get their arses in gear really.
No one lists a replacement exhaust system either!
Like my MiTo as its the TCT but as the article says, not that exciting to drive. But hey, it does the job.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff