RE: 2020 Jaguar F-Type R | Driven

RE: 2020 Jaguar F-Type R | Driven

Tuesday 11th February 2020

2020 Jaguar F-Type R | PH Review

The most important facelift yet for the Jaguar F-Type - does it still compete in 2020?



Hands up those who recall the Jaguar C-X16 concept? Quite a looker, even by the exalted standards of Jaguar concept cars. Pleasingly, it very closely previewed an F-Type road car as well; shorn of its concept car fripperies - the hybrid and the fancy glass hatch - the C-X16 was 99 per cent the F-Type Coupe of 2014, much to everyone’s satisfaction. 

Want to know something remarkable? The C-X16 coupe was shown in September 2011. There were development F-Types on 62 plates, and the first drives were June 2013. Manchester United were Premier League champions in May 2013 - that’s how old the F-Type is, and how long the design has been around for.

To some, then, this facelift - dropping the V6, grafting on a new front end, sprucing the interior - might look too piecemeal, when something more drastic is arguably required. But there’s another way to think of the F-Type; alongside the fact it still looks pretty damn good despite advancing years, consider where sports cars have gone since 2013.

When it first went on sale, there was an R8 available with a 4.2 V8, the AMG C63 used a 6.2, a 911 revved to 8,000rpm and an M3 even higher. None of those cars exist any longer, yet here’s an updated F-Type that has introduced a new, 450hp V8 variant for £70,000, as well as a 575hp R - effectively the old SVR in a more modest suit - at less than £100,000. The appeal of that 5.0-litre has always been considerable, a point now made more prominent with a lower sticker price and fewer memorable engines around.


In addition, Jaguar finally appears to have realised the F-Type’s true calling; no longer are there events on track, as there were for the SVR and the all-wheel drive variants. This 2020 car was launched on a Portuguese ‘road trip’, taking in hundreds of kilometres of the best tarmac to be found between Porto and Lisbon. It’s the journey for a super GT car, which we all know the F-Type has always been, rather than the dedicated sports car that’s sometimes been its implied billing - so it should work well.

The hunch is underlined by the ‘R’ flagship; while inheriting the 575hp derivative of the SVR's engine, as well as a raft of spring, damper and roll-bar tweaks, it’s less aggressive to look at and to drive. A cheaper one, too: that SVR was £110,000 in 2016, while this new R starts at £97,000.

All that said, the F-Type road trip doesn’t begin auspiciously. This has never been a small car, nor one blessed with good visibility, and obviously that hasn’t changed with a facelift. In unfamiliar urban environments they become genuine demerits, too much is obscured for confidence and the feeling of a snug, cocooning cockpit is outweighed by an inability to see out of it. Moreover, while the new 12.3-inch digital dash is a vast improvement on the dials that went before, it does make the driver more aware of the nav’s sluggishness now it can be seen right in front of them. Still, hopefully with CarPlay now standard there’s going to be less need to rely on the awkward OEM system.

Once out of the city though, the F-Type really shines. Much as it always has, in all honesty; a good driving experience doesn’t date.  On the motorway it’s plush, refined and soothing, executing the Jag GT thing with aplomb. It doesn’t float and murmur along like a big saloon, instead boasting consummate refinement with just enough of the road coming through to remind you of its sportier billing. Perhaps the 305-section rear tyres make a tad too much noise, though there’d be precious little complaint about driving the F-Type a huge distance.


It’s even better on slightly smaller roads. On fast, flowing, deserted tarmac, the F-Type R is in its element. Leave Dynamic mode alone; while appreciably tightening up the body control, it’s to the detriment of ride quality, as well as the steering’s slick, lucid weighting. Much better to leave it in Normal, turn on the sports exhaust and enjoy one of the great GT experiences.

Jags are always notable for their ability to flow while retaining admirable composure, and that hasn’t been meddled with here. The R starts to feel every one of its claimed 1,850kg when challenged with smaller roads and bigger stops, though given time and space it exhibits a lovely balance between accommodating ride and handling dynamism.

The response and weighting of the steering in standard mode means the F-Type can be poured into a bend, the all-wheel drive system notable for not meddling with that; almost as soon as the weight has settled the throttle can be chased, rear-drive balance gradually embellished by the additional traction of the front wheels hauling you out. While rear-drive was always the heroic choice for an F-Type, having the flagship R as an all-wheel prospect is really no great loss - it’s a very clever system.

And if the Intelligent Driveline Dynamics, LED displays and suave new look bring the F-Type up to date somewhat, the V8 remains as crammed with traditional appeal as a night out with old pals: memorable, boisterous, a little too loud and not always to the approval of onlookers. While the kerbweight ensures that 575hp doesn’t feel as rapid here as it might in something like a 911, the F-Type still piles on speed imperiously, torque plentiful and power immense. The noise, even with a particulate filter now fitted, remains raucous, endearing and wholly brilliant. If turbos, downsizing and reduced cylinder count turn you off, the supercharged V8 - while we have it, at least - makes a compelling case for itself. Accompanied by an eight-speed auto updated with experience from the XE Project 8 (think snappier downshifts, more aggressive upshifts), the F-Type R powertrain is as emotive and rewarding as it’s ever been. Which is to say very.


That’s the key to this F-Type facelift: unable to overhaul the entire concept just yet, Jag has played to the car’s considerable strengths. And in the current climate of ever more serious, virtuous, joyless motor vehicles, it’s fortunate that the F’s attributes shine even brighter now than in 2013. It's a big old charmer, brimming with noise, drama and driver reward. There have always been objectively better sports cars, but few have been able to compete - trite though it may sound - on subjective appeal and desirability. A feel-good machine in a sombre time, especially painted bright yellow, that can’t fail to raise a smile. And when did a new car last do that?

Of course there's an argument to have about the new look. To these eyes it’s a really successful facelift, the LED lights giving the front end a lower, meaner, sleeker appearance, and a renewed presence on the road. The detractors says it’s a more generic face than before, and jars with the unaltered rear end. Certainly, the Sorrento Yellow is even more eye-catching in the metal (as it might well be for £4,500), and it should be noted that the rear is more successful without the R’s additional aero bits. 

In fact, the 450hp car that sits beneath this one may well be the pick of the new F-Type range, boasting as it does the same V8 appeal with a more enticing £70k entry price - as well as the option of rear-wheel drive. Until that model is tested, though, the F-Type R remains a likeable, enticing, engaging sports GT; the claims about “luxurious materials, exacting craftsmanship and beautiful detailing” seem a little far-fetched - because it still feels broadly the same inside - but there is just enough about this F-Type to make it recommendable over the outgoing version.

The F-Type’s range of talents is as compelling now as ever, then, even allowing for the flaws that have been there since the beginning. Put it this way: for the £110,000 that this Jaguar costs, a nicely optioned 992 Carrera S is also available. And despite the Porsche’s advantages across the board, it would be easy to understand a buyer plumping for the Jag. It’s far from perfect - but the F-Type remains an immensely nice car to drive, look at and be seen in. And who wouldn’t like one of those?


SPECIFICATION: JAGUAR F-TYPE R COUPE
Engine:
5,000cc, supercharged V8
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 575@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 516@3,500-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.7secs
Top speed: 186mph
Weight: 1,818kg (EU, with driver)
MPG: 26.4 (WLTP)
CO2: 252g/km
Price: £97,280 (as standard; price as tested £110,590, comprised of Sorrento Yellow gloss paint for £4,500, 20-inch Style 1066 wheels for £520, Black brake calipers for £320, Exterior Black Pack for £265, Climate Pack for £670, Blind Spot Assist Pack for £450, Fixed panoramic roof for £1,310, Privacy gloss for £375, Ebony Suedecloth Performance seats, 12-way heated for £1,865, Ebony suedecloth headlining for £1,000, Suedecloth sun visors with vanity mirrors for £50, Carbon Fibre centre console for £475, Meridian Surround Sound System for £990 and Secure tracker for £520.)














Author
Discussion

HeMightBeBanned

Original Poster:

617 posts

178 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
That new front end is ghastly.

flukey5

404 posts

60 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
New front end looks less elegant and more generic than ever. I think those lights could look at home on about 12 different german saloons.

Losing the V6 and with it the manual box is a real shame. I desperately tried to stretch to afford one while they still existed but sadly even man maths couldn't solve the problem :'(

I will continue to look through the classifieds for a manual P380 in ultra blue/red while convincing myself "I wouldn't have liked it anyway because it is heavy"

gutted.

drpep

1,758 posts

168 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Still a handsome car to these eyes. Hope they do well with it. Some serious performance on offer there. Shame it’s auto but that’s all people buy now so hey ho.

A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
If ever there was a lost opportunity for a face-lift this is it!
Those Audi headlights don't belong on a Jaguar, yet just another sad, depressing 'face'.
Re the BT yellow paint at a £4.5k option that's a ridiculous price. It wouldn't cost anymore per litre than a standard colour and costs nothing to tip it into the auto sprayer bar some gun cleaner to wash it out with. Charge a little to do so like most makers do for other colours but not £4.5 big ones..

redroadster

1,737 posts

232 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Seems like updates never look as good as original ,I'm v interested in a used one more room inside than a boxster and cheaper than a 997 with equally as good looking but with better noises .

T1berious

2,255 posts

155 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
I always liked the idea of the F-type coupe, gorgeous looking car. It's also one of those "heart over head" cars, you pretty much just have to have it in your life purchases because the minute you hit the "hold on, let's look at the competition" button things get a bit shaken.

Its placement above the Cayman / Boxster and slap into 911 territory makes the case difficult. The new 718 GTS 4.0 still looks like the natural competitor for the cheaper f-type and as soon as your at the R money that's 911 S money as mentioned in the article.

This strikes me as a mid life refresh 3 years too late. And if it has to be a V8 in your life the AMG GT also is in the same ball park.

Think I'd stretch to the hairy chested Merc but I'm sure the f-type will sell if its heavily discounted or there's huge dealer contributions.

Schermerhorn

4,342 posts

189 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Looks like a nice facelift, especially at the front.

The rear end though, that diffuser should be all black.
Painting it the same colour as the rest of the body makes it look very ungainly and lardy at the rear.

stuckmojo

2,971 posts

188 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
They ruined the looks

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all



Can we have more lairy at the front end? A bit too chartered accountant as it is.

But just look at the colour of this thing! There's nothing "Pardon me, excuse me, terribly sorry" about it. See you in Dubai or Miami!




DoubleD

22,154 posts

108 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Well they have spoilt what was a good looking car. Also I cant get over how much these things weigh!

camel_landy

4,886 posts

183 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
HeMightBeBanned said:
That new front end is ghastly.
My first thought was "Mustang"... silly

M

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
The front isn't as offensive as some make out. Especially in person. A lot of the ire directed towards it is band wagon jumping IMO.

I'd paint or wrap the rear diffuser in black. And I wouldn't want a Jaguar in bright yellow, despite having had a TVR and a Lamborghini in that colour.

If I were to spend £100k on an F-Type (which I wouldn't) it would be on the recent Lister version based on the old model.

The V8 convertibles at £30K are tempting for a great sounding summer cruiser though.

cerb4.5lee

30,480 posts

180 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
HeMightBeBanned said:
That new front end is ghastly.
Completely agree and they have ruined what used to be a really good looking car for me.

It has lost its identity now that it looks just like the boring XE saloon.

Dr Interceptor

7,772 posts

196 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
These have actually ended up being really good value... Have just specc'd a non R 450hp V8 convertible at £82k, which includes Velocity Blue paint at £4500, so you can easily have a brand new one in the £70's.

A 911 Convertible starts at £92k, and will be £100k with some spec, so £20-30k more!

I know the F-Type is an old car now, but its a massive price difference over its rivals.

TNH

559 posts

147 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
I have a 2018 car. Love the way it looks and its a great daily. I'm just sick of it breaking down constantly and being in the dealers once a month with a new issue. It really takes the shine off of it and that's why I'll be trading it in for a Porsche as soon as I can afford to.

wab172uk

2,005 posts

227 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Would someone select RWD over AWD because they'll slide it round round-a-bouts, or to just make out to people they do?

Surely AWD is the better option in the UK, where it rains more than it's sunny?

Augustus Windsock

3,360 posts

155 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Had a sit in one a couple of years or so ago
The poor lady owner had suffered a puncture and wasn’t going anywhere so I gallantly have a hand
What surprised me was the paucity of stowage space (and for me the awkward opening), and the usual Jaguar ‘inverse TARDIS’ effect, the car being smaller on the inside than it seems from the outside
And I agree, £4K+ for yellow paint? Bonkers. Personally I’d get it wrapped if you really wanted that colour...

SFO

5,169 posts

183 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
front end looks like an Audi in drag

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

265 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
Weight: 1,818kg

that's the issue with F types.

cayman-black

12,641 posts

216 months

Monday 10th February 2020
quotequote all
IMO its a good looking car dare i say its better looking than the Aston Vantage.