RE: BMW M2 Competition: Driven

RE: BMW M2 Competition: Driven

Monday 30th July 2018

2020 BMW M2 Competition | PH Review

The M2 has been specifically remade to surpass the Porsche 718 Cayman. Well, guess what...



Since the launch of the Porsche Cayman 12 years ago this moment has been unthinkable. A sports car from a manufacturer which isn't Porsche, offering a car for similar money, that makes us think: perhaps, just perhaps, this is the better car. Yarp. Really.

The M2 Competition, then. It's BMW's current-smallest M car, turned more hardcore than the regular M2, as befits the 'competition' tag the manufacturer applies to cars one-rung higher than regular M cars. But such, BMW thinks, is the appeal of this car, that it simply replaces the current M2, rather than both versions being available - though maybe there's cost factor here, too.

Because the changes run pretty deep. Too deep, perhaps, to keep two different M2s available. Most notably the M2's single, twin-scroll turbo straight-six has been replaced with a detuned M3/M4 engine, which has two single-scroll turbos, each boosting three cylinders. Power is up by a healthy 40hp and 62lb ft to 410hp and 405lb ft, which is the start of things. The M3/M4 wishbone-shaped engine-bay strut brace makes its way over, too, as does this engine's additional cooling needs - which explains the bigger vents out front.


This all pushes the weight up by a not inconsiderable 55kg to 1625kg inc driver, fuel and that. (When we road tested an M2 in 2016 it was 1575kg on MIRA's scales, while a 718 Cayman S was 1430kg, and we'd be naïve to think these things don't matter.) So to counter that - and because it feels like BMW has just been inclined to throw quite a lot of effort at this small coupe - the brakes are bigger and the suspension has been revised.

There's not so much in the spring and damper rates or anti-roll bars, but the steering has been recalibrated, as has the stability control, while at the rear there's some rose jointing too. The idea is simple - make it more precise at the front, make the back follow better, and make it easier to drive at the limit. Make it more sports car, less hot rod. Make it so that the engine isn't the main reason you'd pick one over a 718.

You kinda get the vibe that, with the adoption of that wheezy four-cylinder engine, Porsche revealed a bit of vulnerable flesh between its panels, and BMW has gone at it.


It already had the 718's engine nailed, to be honest, and this only extends the gap. There's a new exhaust (obvs) with opening flaps, plus an incoming petrol particulate filter, and an inline six is so smooth, so zingy, and here, so urgent, only a bit boosty. It's also so biddable that I'd choose a manual over a twin-clutch box, not just because it's a manual and is therefore more engaging but, because, if you can't be bothered to shift that much, it's enjoyable to just let the engine lug things out anyway, such is the spread of torque.

The handling stops short of being transformed, but it's double-digit per cent better than it was, everywhere. (Except, perhaps, in ride quality, which is still a bit insistent on bad roads.) But it steers better, with less communication and slickness than a 718, I suspect, but with really good accuracy and response, which is way better just off straight than it was, and a good enough approximation of feel. Such is the precision, and such is the response in the chassis, that although a Porsche is ultimately more agile (with its weight by the centre rather than the ends, it'll turn more quickly), the BMW is not far away as a sports car.

On the road it's incisive, fast, engaging. Less fluid and oily than a Cayman, I'm sure. But closer than it has ever been, because it's keyed-in, alert, balanced. Closer to a Porsche than an M has been since ... cripes. The 1M Coupe? Earlier? Not entirely sure. A question for another day, but know that it's great fun.


And on track it's great. In higher speed turns there's a bit of steady-state understeer, as there should be. You can quell it using the traditional front-engined, rear drive methods: lift the throttle or trail the brakes, whereupon the M2 Competition reveals its adjustability, and the tight body control on its passive dampers. It's like a miniature Aston V12 Vantage S, in that the cornering line is largely your choice. Safe and secure, wild and hilarious, or anything in between.

The stability control has two stages of off. MDM is half off, and is really good, allowing up to around a quarter turn of 'oppo' on a circuit. All off is all off, after which the M2 is a hoot.

So. We like it. A lot. Is it better, overall, than a 718 Cayman? This being PH I'm spared the indignity of putting a star rating to it and there'll be a chance, I hope, to get them together on the right road and circuit at the same time. But if I were signing off on my monthly payments, right here, right now: for the first time since the Cayman's introduction, I wouldn't make them to Porsche.


SPECIFICATION | 2020 BMW M2 COMPETITION
Engine:
2936cc 6cyl, twin-turbo petrol
Transmission: Six-speed manual
Power: 410hp at 5250-7000rpm
Torque: 405lb ft at 2350-5200rpm
0-62mph 4.4sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1625kg
MPG: 30.7mpg
CO2: 227g/km
Price: £49,805









Author
Discussion

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

263 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
As a Porsche man I am intrigued by this new car. I trawled the specs and created a sheet to compare it to the 718 Cayman S PDK.

Long story short: this is as close to the Cayman that BMW have ever gotten, the only criticism I can make is that the M Performance brakes should have been standard however, even with extra caliper boost, the surface area of the discs does not increase, which I find strange.

Thumbs up from me.

Wow, well done BMW for delivering a car, on paper at least, beats the 718 Cayman S. The writing is on the wall for the Porsche in the head-to-head tests and its all down to that bloomin engine change, are you reading this Porsche ?


Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

263 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Sion111R said:
Wills2 said:
Yes but without a proper M engine...



Ha ha....fair comment. But help me out here, I own an “old M2” and this thread seems to suggest I should be distraught having bought a chavtastic, ugly, non sportcar on which i’m about to lose my life savings as values crash. Oh hang on, it’s not got a proper engine either...
Damn wish i’d waited now for the proper model - but then again, there will be a real Superleggera along in 6 months time....Let’s repeat this entire thread again then! In the meantime I will continue to enjoy my fantastic old m2. driving
Ooh, that sounded really bitter! Not my intention.
hah well, i doubt BMW planned this car from the start, they saw an opportunity with the 718 4-pot debacle and have taken it. With spectacular results.

If they do make a road car follow up to this to take on the Cayman GT4 it’s a mouth watering prospect.

This new M car has an air of kitchen sink engineering about it, in order to try and beat a known rival using a less optimal starting design.

The last time i recall this happenining was when Nissan took on the 997 turbo with the GTR and then Porsche responded by throwing loads of toys at the 997 Gen2.


Edited by Carl_Manchester on Monday 30th July 19:35

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

263 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
130R said:
jl4069 said:
Carl_Manchester said:
hah well, i doubt BMW planned this car from the start, they saw an opportunity with the 718 4-pot debacle and have taken it. With spectacular results.

If they do make a road car follow up to this to take on the Cayman GT4 it’s a mouth watering prospect.

This new M car has an air of kitchen sink engineering about it, in order to try and beat a known rival using a less optimal starting design.

The last time i recall this happenining was when Nissan took on the 997 turbo with the GTR and then Porsche responded by throwing loads of toys at the 997 Gen2.


Edited by Carl_Manchester on Monday 30th July 19:35
This is some rather refreshing and honest reality. Why cant auto journalists write with this honesty?
By "honest reality" I assume you mean absolute nonsense from someone that seems to think you can compare cars based on specs alone.

An M2 doesn't drive anything like a Cayman. That doesn't mean one is better than the other but anyone that thinks they are similar is clueless.
Similar excuses were trotted out by 997 Turbo owners when the GTR landed.

And no doubt said excuses will no doubt be trotted out by Porsche OPC sales-people all over the world with a tick box list of where the Cayman beats this new M car. It will be a short list.